Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clintons' main tactical error may be....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Didereaux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 02:21 PM
Original message
Clintons' main tactical error may be....
he biggest negative on Clinton all along has been the assumption of title before the fact. The public is angry, angry with Dem Congress for not stopping the war and prosecuting criminals in office, they are angry at the administration for lying to them about the war, for lying about many other things, for high oil, for billions wasted at home and abroad that seemingly went directly from US treasury into criminal corps pockets, angry at themselves for being duped in the first place and on and on and on. You do not get elected or supported by making yourself appear aloof and above such petty feelings. You get yourself elected by being angry(or at least appearing to be so) at the same things, and adamantly stating your intentions to do something about these things.

The Clintons, and their advisers uncharacteristically opted for the statesman approach...it may be too late to recover. Then again the American electorate has the memory and attention span of a hog, and if Clinton goes full bore on the attack, not against the other candidates, but against those the people are mad at, the people may just conclude that she would have more clout and would be more apt to 'kill' the bad guys than would the other candidates. It is an easy leap to conclude that she might hold heavy duty grudges and so be far more apt to pursue vengeance...and so long as it did not interfere with attacking the major domestic issues and foreign problems, there is no logical reason the DoJcannot be kept gainfully employed investigating and prosecuting repug criminals.

that strategy could also work just as well for Edwards...get off the narrow anti-bigbidness soapbax and onto a larger stage that would allow all the other 'anger items' to be hammered at. The voters don't really give a crap about 'feel good' Oprah-esque newage yuppy clap-trap...not when laid side by side with Bush & Co. They will go back to ohmani kas, and kumbaya AFTER the bloodletting and burnings are over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
marylanddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. i think you already posted this...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Didereaux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. yeah, something screwed up, oh well I think I will blame it on DU software heheh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigbrother05 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. I watched Hillary last night
one of her stump speeches, she was angry and talking about Bush, this is what i want to hear.
Not dissing our own.
Hillary go after Bush and all his crooks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueManDude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. They should have ignored Obama and used Bill only at the end
theyu panicked when Obama raised all the $$$ early on and started drawing "contrasts" when they should have stayed above the fray, played nice with BO and ran against Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. The other mistake they made was assuming that people would
see the Clintons as having the only answers to the nation's problems and, therefore, indispensible. I don't think it occurred to them that not everyone would see them as the answer nor that people really desire to return to the nineties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC