Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

whodunit

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Froward69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 10:18 AM
Original message
Poll question: whodunit
as of this posting no group has taken responsibility for Bhutto's Death.
Lots of finger pointing, me thinks its about shifting blame.
So who do you think sent the assassin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. Musharraf, he had the most to gain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Not Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree, it was politically motivated, not terra.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nyc 4 Biden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. i think terrorists . . .
think of affecting politics to further their cause as well. I voted for al qaeda.

Just found this...

http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/asiapcf/12/28/bhutto.dhs.alqaeda/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. I think that's to deflect the blame away from Musharraf...
Of course they will try to blame Al Qaeda. I honestly don't think we will ever know for sure, because they will obscure any credible investigation. They want people to think it was someone other than Musharraf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. He had the most to lose, read this:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. al-queda elements in mushy's gov.t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
4. I'd say Mushariff (sp?) as she posed the greatest threat to him
India? Well, I thought they liked her better than Pervez. Perhaps I am wrong.

but OJ maybe had something to gain...sorry for the black humor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pgh_dem Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
5. The accepted spelling is Musharraf
And 'sent the assassin' is misleading.

Sometimes all you have to do is keep propping the door open if you want someone to walk in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Froward69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. agreed
I should have finished my coffee first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
8. Bush got what he paid Musharraf the 5.3 billion dollars for.
Edited on Fri Dec-28-07 10:29 AM by MethuenProgressive
Forgive me for making political remarks while on the day her burial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rAVES Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
9. Rudy 9ui11iani
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
11. 1-4
with varying levels of involvement - they all contributed to creating the situation that allowed this to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
12. msnbc just announced that Team Bush has irrefutable proof
from telcon evidence that Al Qaida was involved.

OK, let's assume they have cell phones, not land lines. We STILL know where they are.

These days, these type of news releases remind me of 1984, not of honest government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
14. I think AQ or other Islamic muslim radicals...but with Musharaff's help...
in the sense that he didn't provide enough security, knowing what the outcome would be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
15. Popeye
He always held a grudge against Bluto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
16. Apparently al Qaeda and the Taliban are working closely together in
some province of Pakistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
17. Col. Mustard, in the study, with a candlestick
wait, what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
18. I believe robertpaulsen has a nice analysis on this thread as to a possibility.
Edited on Fri Dec-28-07 03:45 PM by Uncle Joe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC