Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ron Paul going off with Timbo on Press the Meat

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 10:06 AM
Original message
Ron Paul going off with Timbo on Press the Meat
He's lambasting US interventionist foreign policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TalkingDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. with my libertarian leanings, Ron Paul strikes many sound notes with me
Russert was being his usual vindictively, smarmy self, bringing up R.Paul's planks from his run 20 years ago.

I think I would be much more concerned if a candidates positions had not evolved in 20 years than the shifts seen in R.Paul's. Ossification feels safe, but it's a very dangerous way to try to deal with an evolving culture and country.

If I were going to ever vote R., it would be for a candidate like Paul.



My Favorite Master Artist: Karen Parker GhostWoman Studios
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ron Paul who just said
that the civil war wasn't worth fighting? That eventually, the government could've just BOUGHT the slaves and freed 'em? Nice solution. What if slaveowners didn't want to sell? And where would a Ron Paul government GET the money to buy them?

He's a crank, a nutcase, a lunatic, and a racist scumbag, and it makes my head spin to see anybody here support him in any way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yet once again myth instead of fact, the slave issue wasn't an issue
in the civil war until England decided to side with the south, Lincoln then put the slave issue on the war to block England from getting involved in the war. But then what can you expect from pukes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Umm...slavery had everything to do with the Civil War
and it's revisionist to say it didn't. Every major issue involved slavery in some way, shape, or form.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. That's such nonsense.
Did your pants burst into flames while you typed that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. The only non-sensical thing is revisionism...
Here are some causes of the Civil War...sparks that created the flame.

1. Growing Abolitionist Movement
2. Economic/Social Factors BASED on a slave economy in the South. Also the expanding Northwest territory
3. Election of Abraham Lincoln - viewed by southerners as a threat to slavery.
4. Missouri Compromise
5. Kansas-Nebraska Act

I can go on and on...but the above listed items ALL had something to do with slavery. So, to say slavery had very little...worse yet NOTHING to do with the Civil War IS revisionism!!

MSN Encarta really has a good and lengthy entry about the Civil War which you should read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. I think you meant to reply to somebody else
I'm agreeing with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. Oops....lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. He said that?
you're joking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TalkingDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Go selectively edit content and troll somebody else, I'm busy. n/t



My Favorite Master Artist: Karen Parker GhostWoman Studios
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. yeah
you're busy shilling for a racist right-wing nutbag on a Democratic site.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. Did you watch the interview this morning?
If you did, I don't see how you can say that he didn't sound more to the left than what our candidates sound like.

He's a crank, a nutcase, a lunatic, and a racist scumbag, and it makes my head spin to see anybody here support him in any way


Do me favor. Don't assume that comments about him here are a show of support for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Yes of course I saw it
which is why I am discussing specific things he said on the show.

It just boggles my mind that so-called liberals could defend in any way a John Birch-type radical libertarian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. I'd rather hear what Paul had to say today than listen to other Repukes pushing religion & warfare
Anyway, sorry about that, I didn't think you had seen the show. My bad on that :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozone_man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. What sounds left is really just libertarian thinking.
He's not an authoritarian, except when it comes to religious issues like abortion. So, he's an imperfect Libertarian.

The reason Ron Paul sounds so much like Kucinich is that they are both libertarian. Kucinich is a left wing libertarian, while Paul is a right wing Libertarian (big L).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Thanks it just goes to show how much I still have to learn about some of the intracacies of politics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Well I have few LIbertarian leanings but Paul didn't sound as crazy as I thought he would.
I admired his courage speaking out. Maybe he's crazy but he made quite a few points about our funding constant war that aren't crazy...but the truth. Keep the money at home for the terrible needs we have here. Instead we have Sovereign Wealth Funds bailing out the Crooks who inflated the Mortgage Bubble and now we have the Saudi's and the Chinese buying up our country. America is for SALE...because of our WARS and the Military/Media Industrial Complex.

Ron Paul is saying much of what many Progressives on this site feel. I'm amazed that Conservatives are so enthralled with him. In my Conservative Fundie area there are Ron Paul signs everywhere... These are the same people who are the Uber Patriots who were all for taking out Saddam and supporting Israel and US bombing Iran because it would bring us closer to Armageddon.. What's going on with that? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I was shocked to find myself agreeing with him on many points..
especially his strong anti-interventionist theme. He did not sound like a Republican to me. How screwey is that??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. Same here. It's amazing how people are getting flamed here for agreeing with what Paul said today
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. Flamed.. on DU?? Mais Non !! :-))
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. Listening to Paul today on MTP, I think he sounds more to the left than any of our candidates do
I know according to some here that he's got a shady background with some racial comments he made in the past, and that is of concern, but listening to this guy speak today to Russert, I can now understand the current Ron Paul "craze" that's going on, especially with young people. The trouble with Paul's chances are that he is definitely in the wrong party. Listening to him talk about the evilness of the corporateness and how aspects of it are bordering on fascism, among many other things he touched upon, you gotta give the guy some credit.

I almost hate to say it, but I think he'd be a hit on DU if he were a Democrat, especially with how he touches on subjects like Bush and the borderline fascism this country is approaching.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Ron Paul
appeals mostly to alienated young white men who have grown up in the post-Reagan "gummint bad" era.

Ron Paul has more than a shady background. He has a 100% rating from the John Birch Society. He was endorsed by David Duke - former Grand Wizard of the KKK. He just received a contribution from a white supremacist (Don Black of StormFront. org) - and he refuses to give it back. His old newsletter that he tries to deny being part of was filled with racist commentary.

Ron Paul wants Roe v. Wade to be overturned. He believes abortion should be decided by the states. I don't happen to think that a woman should be forced to be an incubator because she lives in some pig ignorant state that teaches creationism in the schools.

Ron Paul does not believe in the separation of church and state. He's a right wing religious nutcase - and a right wing Republican.

I'm amazed at how this nasty little man can fool so many people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. There's nothing to the left about Paul
he wants a government so small as to be practically invisible. He wants corporations to have free reign and to pay minimal or no taxes. He believes states should be able to outlaw abortion. He doesn't believe the government should provide any social services.

He's a right-wing lunatic, who happens to be against the war, so that makes him a hero to some people who have no idea what he really stands for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. There certainly WAS much to the Left about Paul today. I don't think you saw the interview
I think you either plainly hate Paul or you're basing your vitriol upon some of Paul's past skeletons that's I've heard about on DU, but the guy clearly sounded like someone from the left today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. I don't see how anybody can say that
he pretty much wants to eliminate government.

Opposing foreign intervention doesn't make him a left-winger by any stretch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. It was pretty amusing to watch n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
22. Russert is ALWAYS trying to trip up politicians on his show I don't know why......
these guys go on fat so show. Next week Obama is going on not a smart move in my opinion.right before the Iowa caucus bad move Russert will be trying to go after Obama with guns blazing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 05:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC