Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

2004 Pre-Iowa-Caucus polling: Kerry 26%, Edwards 23%, Dean 20%, Gephardt 18%. The order was CORRECT

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Stop Cornyn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 12:20 AM
Original message
2004 Pre-Iowa-Caucus polling: Kerry 26%, Edwards 23%, Dean 20%, Gephardt 18%. The order was CORRECT
despite the fact that there was a shift in the numbers. The actual results were Kerry 38%, Edwards 32%, Dean 18%, Gephardt 11%.

There has been some discussion here recently comparing the NATIONAL polls before the 2004 Iowa caucus and the results in the Iowa caucus. It is true that the NATIONAL polls are entirely useless as a tool to predict the Iowa caucus result.

But it is worth remembering the IOWA polling was a much better (but still imperfect) predictor of the Iowa caucus:

A Des Moines Register poll released the day before the caucuses showed Kerry narrowly in front at 26 percent of likely caucus participants, Edwards right behind at 23 percent, followed by Dean at 20 percent and Gephardt at 18 percent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
antiimperialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, but was that the only poll released the week before the elections?
Perhaps others were more inaccurate. Not that this was very accurate either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stop Cornyn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Zogby's pre-caucus poll had Kerry 25%, Dean 22%, Edwards 21%, Gephardt 18%. No one went from the
bottom tier to finish in the top tier:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlyingSquirrel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. Easy to predict the day before... but look what happened 2 weeks before
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=3854345&mesg_id=3854414

2 weeks before the Iowa caucuses, a KCCI TV poll had Dean at 29%, Gephardt 25%, Kerry 18%, Edwards 8% with a +/- 5% margin of error. Actual results were Kerry 38%, Edwards 32%, Dean 18%, Gephardt 11%.

Best Iowa poll we have to date (Rasmussen, Dec. 12) approx. 3 weeks to go till Iowa, shows Clinton 29%, Obama 26%, Edwards 22%. Statistical 3-way tie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yukari Yakumo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. A point and a question
The '08 poll is pre-DMR.

Is the '04 poll you point out before or after Edwards got the DMR nod?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stop Cornyn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. The 2004 poll mentioned in the OP as well as the Zogby poll in reply #2 were after the endorsement
by the DMR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenvpi Donating Member (235 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 03:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. Nice!
Let's hope this continues. Of course Kerry isn't the best Democrat, but he is the most electible of the choices we have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlyingSquirrel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 03:30 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Scooby Doo "HRuh???"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. It's obviously some kind of satire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. Key words being poll released day before caucus.
And the shift in percentages is tremendous far beyond the MOE.

Its almost a fluke that they got the order right.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC