Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who is behind the Edwards "I'm sorry" negative ad?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Herman Munster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-14-07 10:24 PM
Original message
Who is behind the Edwards "I'm sorry" negative ad?
Edited on Fri Dec-14-07 10:24 PM by Herman Munster
It looks professionally done. The message at the end makes it sound like they want Edwards supporters to support Obama.

The user only joined 9 hours ago and this is the only video they ever posted.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7pOZML6P0Vg&eurl=http://mydd.com/story/2007/12/14/182521/12
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
surfermaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-14-07 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Who wins if it is believed..does that ans. your question
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-14-07 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. Everyone but Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-14-07 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. I thought it could be Kucinich supporters, too
Or Obama supporters. Or somebody wanting it to look that way. I saw it on MyDD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Czolgosz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-14-07 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. No, it's douchebags like those who repost it. Not Dennis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-14-07 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #13
29. It makes the most sense
The final line is Dennis. I'm not saying he made it and is distributing it, but supporters of his could easily be. There is resentment that Edwards drained off some of Dennis's usual support. Dennis is angry. Nobody's gone negative against Edwards except Dennis. Nobody's called Edwards on his record like Dennis has, except one time Dodd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-14-07 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #13
33. LOL.... CZ, best response yet !!!


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ (( ))

Now a question for Herman Munster:

You said... "The message at the end makes it sound like they want Edwards supporters to support Obama"

Which to me suggests that you (not us mind you, but YOU) think that Obama's team must be behind the clip.

So..... How did you come to that conclusion anyway?

Please explain to the class your reasoning, because I gotta tell you... I don't see where the video points to any campaign in particular.

Thank you for enlightening us.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Herman Munster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-14-07 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. it's common sense
who has the most to gain by siphoning off edwards support in the iowa caucus. It's certainly not kucinich. He will not be viable in 99% of the precincts and his supporters will end up having to caucus with someone else or go home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-14-07 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. Ah.. yeah..

.. sure thing.. whatever you say Munsty...



.............................. (( ))
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-14-07 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. That video pretty much sums up JE
He should have used the "I'm sorry" song on that video as his official campaign theme song :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-14-07 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. Its a good ad, but what at the end makes you tie it to Obama?
If anything it looked like a Hillary plug. She's the one obcessed with
"expirence"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Herman Munster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-14-07 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. well
the message at the end of the ad doesn't make sense if it was from a Hillary supporter. Since she like Edwards voted for the iraq war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-14-07 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. Maybe. Unless Clinton wants to bleed some of Edwards' support into a non-threatening
Edited on Fri Dec-14-07 10:41 PM by Occam Bandage
candidate like Kucinich. Or maybe it's some Republicans just stirring the pot for kicks. The problem with trying to find a culprit for a hit piece is that literally everyone has means, motive, and opportunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-14-07 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. The end is what made me think of Kucinich
About getting it right the first time. Clinton couldn't say that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-14-07 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. Kuciniches debate line was "We need a president who gets it right the first time"
And what the hell is "expirence"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-14-07 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Look at Lirwin being the spelling police!
Super Cool Lirwin!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-14-07 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #17
32. I don't know what "expirence" is. Who are the Kuciniches?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogmarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-14-07 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. Some desperate asshole or
group of desperate assholes who are afraid of the fact that Edwards could win in Iowa...and beyond.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-14-07 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. "Desperate. You keep using that word."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogmarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-14-07 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. It's apt. So what's your problem? Are you desperate
because you can't think of anything else to post?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-14-07 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. It seems I can add "desperate" to my list of
"words commonly seen on Democratic Underground that have apparently lost all traces of their original meaning."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogmarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-14-07 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. Maybe to you "desperate" lacks meaning.
I used to think DU Biden supporters were pretty cool people. Now, not so much.

Biden remains my #2 choice despite supporters like you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-14-07 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. When you claim that the supporters of other candidates are "desperate"
Edited on Fri Dec-14-07 10:58 PM by Occam Bandage
because of your third-place candidate (running a distant third, mind you, everywhere but IA, and with absolutely no funding to compete through Super Tuesday), well...you have stripped the word of absolutely any meaning it might have had. "Desperation" is the state of being in a situation so grim that there is no hope remaining of success. Someone "desperate" is someone acting futilely, knowing they have no hope of success, yet still trying. Edwards having "a shot" at winning one state does not lead to "desperation" in anyone.

Tell me now, who is "desperate" on account of Edwards' stranglehold on the bronze?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogmarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-14-07 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. If Edwards does win Iowa
he'll gain support, including, but not limited to, financial support. That could be very bad for the other candidates.

Whoever posted the anti-Edwards video probably realizes this. That's why they did it.

Now get the hell off my back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #31
43. You know who are desparate?
Housewives that's who. See,I managed to insert sexism into yet another DU thread. It's traditional this time of year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surfermaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-14-07 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
24. YOU GOT IT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-14-07 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. Is it possible that some people don't want Edwards as their nominee
and are not assholes.....or do y'all get to decide what's what?

Will it be Bushtype insults for all of us who don't want to kiss Edwards lovely behind?

can we at least wait till after the primaries before we decide to support him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-14-07 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. When such ads as this run constantly during Feb through Aug, when Edwards'
Edited on Fri Dec-14-07 10:34 PM by FrenchieCat
campaign has no money to refute this type of stuff.....we will know who put them out, and it won't make a bit of difference who it was, because the ad speaks for itself...and the only one appearing in the ad is John Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Czolgosz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-14-07 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Waaa!
:cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry:

John Edwards doesn't have as much money as my favorite candidate! Waaaa!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-14-07 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. That's what you will be doing while watching those ads air on the TV
from February till August 28th.

Hope you've got a box of tissue or two or three.

Personally, I find it sad as well....cause I'm fucking tired of losing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-14-07 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. Professionally done? You could do that in iMovie.
Edited on Fri Dec-14-07 10:38 PM by Occam Bandage
Of course, that's often a deliberate choice to give a more informal feeling. Maybe this is a viral-marketing job by the Obama campaign. Maybe it's some freelance work by an Kucinich or a Ron Paul supporter trying to bleed off some of Edwards' netroots support. That seems more likely to me, at the moment--especially since, as others have pointed out, "get it right the first time" is a DK line.

The fact that it has not been posted on any websites yet, to my knowledge, is surprising. The direction of the ad is sophisticated--it attacks Edwards on a strength of his (his honesty) by exposing the weakness underlying it. Whoever did it knows what they're doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-14-07 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. Many here at DU have been discussing Edwards "I'm sorry" on everything
since the beginning of this primary election.

It wouldn't take a brain surgeon to come out with the idea for this video. :eyes:




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laureloak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-14-07 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. Oh, it was one of the converted Clarkies then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-14-07 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. Or one of those "He didn't look at me and give me a smile at the last meeting.......
and so I'll fix him" crazy Edwards female supporter! :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laureloak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-14-07 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #28
36. That makes no sense. Try getting some therapy to get over '04.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-15-07 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #36
41. Urh......Edwards is running now......
Your Clarkie crack wasn't anymore funny than my Edwards mad stalker example was. Guess you own the corner market on first strikes and judging what makes sense, hey?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laureloak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. It's just that you stalk Edwards because of '04. Time to let it go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-14-07 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
11. Kucinich
The line about 'get it right the first time' is his

Although I would not be surprised if it was pugs just trying to keep us divided

People are coalescing around Edwards and Biden as the glitter and novelty wears off the two glamor candidates

The pugs KNOW that is their biggest threat. If we could stop fooling around with them, and DK, and Richardson, and Dodd (I like lots of things about all of them) and just run Biden/Edwards this thing would be over. We could move the inauguration up a year.

The not-so-stealth campaign to keep us at each others throats probably uses our own people as fronts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laureloak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-14-07 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
22. Let those among us who have never made a wrong decision


cast the first stone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-14-07 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Let those of us who have never made a right decision
avoid running for President.

This goes double if you spend half the time at the debates complaining about the frontrunner being a conservative sellout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-14-07 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. That would be "wrong decisionS" with an "S" at the end of Decision.
Let those among us who are not running for President but will be voting for one

cast a vote for a candidate who has made minimal wrong decisions involving the lives of thousands and the well being of others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-14-07 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
37. Well at least it focuses on the ISSUES n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zalinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-14-07 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
39. Who cares?
I know I don't. Many here on this board have made videos of the repub candidates. Big deal. I imagine that during the general election, there will be so many videos, both good and bad that it will become ridiculous. He did say he was sorry, so what. We now have an idiot in the White House who thinks he has been right in every decision he has ever made. And you know what? For some people all those decisions have been right.

Give me a man who can say he is sorry, and will try to avoid making the same mistake, over someone who thinks they always make the right decision, any time.

zalinda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liskddksil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-15-07 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
40. by the way
I dont think John is sorry, that he fought hard for the sunset clause in the patriot act. I dont think he's sorry that he almost got the patients bill of rights passed which the corporate lobbyists were able to defeat. I dont think he's sorry that he voted against Bush's 87 billion Iraq appropriation because there was no provision for body armor. All candidates make mistakes, but Edwards has had some great moments too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC