Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary Sinking in South Carolina: Dems Question Clinton's Electability

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Carrieyazel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 08:56 PM
Original message
Hillary Sinking in South Carolina: Dems Question Clinton's Electability
Edited on Fri Nov-30-07 09:35 PM by Carrieyazel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. I know things!

We know why you are in such a frenzy!




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cgrindley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Alternate Headline: EDWARDS STILL TRAILS CLINTON IN SC
wow. it's amazing that he can actually be losing to her in his own backyard, eh?


Plus... if SC doubts the electability of the person who is STILL leading the polls there, then I guess they're either damn dumb or they equally negative expectations of the candidates who are losing to Clinton.

PS thanks for the awesome biased headline... that was very Fox News of you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. The story doesn't even mention him. For all we know, he's on a trajectory to pass Hil and Barak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cgrindley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-01-07 06:47 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. It doesn't NOT NOT mention him... and trajectories don't mean squat (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-01-07 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Is that supposed to be a parody of a meaningless post, or is it just meaningless?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cgrindley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-01-07 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. I'm just sick of the Edwards people constant Hillary bashing
and would like to warn them that every single Edwards post headline could say something about haircuts or grotesque mansions if they don't knock it off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-01-07 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. OK, but I wasn't bashing Hillary. I was pointing out that Edwards isn't mentioned in the article.
Edited on Sat Dec-01-07 10:11 AM by 1932
Is it OK for me to point that out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cgrindley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-01-07 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. And I was pointing out that he wasn't NOT mentioned (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. Our little bundle of sunshine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. what took them so long?
k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. Didn't She Already Win?
I hope that I don't have to forfeit the deposit for the tux for the coronation...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. Clinton is also causing lunatics to take hostages
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carrieyazel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I don't get where you're coming from. Way off topic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I'm just repeating something I heard on the intertubes
Is that wrong?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. No.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Good, I wouldn't want to be caught making a silly accusation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-01-07 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #7
16. No, I believe that we've collectively proven of late that there is, without reservation, no "wrong"
Everything's fair when my candidate's impeded, and any action I've taken was pre-emptive self-defense.

In fact, the concept of "wrong" is wrong, unless, of course, it pertains to something done by YOU...

Must you ruin EVERYTHING?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. I doubt if any of our Democrats take South Carolina.
South Carolinians are whack....minus the Democrats living there. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
11. Women voters are finally beginning to cross over to Obama...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
13. That's because they've been reading DU.
And ALL the media slime her at every chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
15. I'm glad her lead is fading
Not because I am anti-Hillary per se, but I want to see who will come out on top when a real battle ensues. This is the kind of battle we need to ensure that our candidate is ready to deal with the dirty tricks of the sleazy good-for-nothing Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-01-07 02:25 AM
Response to Original message
17. "embroiled in a fight for her political life"
Edited on Sat Dec-01-07 02:27 AM by calteacherguy
That sums it up nicely. But the hull has already ruptured...there is nothing that can be done now for her but follow the inevitable path to her destiny.

She is the Titanic of political figures.

And the band played on...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-01-07 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
19. Hillary has an approval rating of 83% among blacks. Are you saying blacks are stupid and awful?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-01-07 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
22. Finally, SC Democrats wake up and rediscover the serious question of electability!
Edited on Sat Dec-01-07 10:09 AM by ClarkUSA
It's about time, now that Hillary doesn't look so inevitable anymore and her campaign has been anything but flawless.

Oh, and her nosediving early voting states' poll numbers help. :-)

Thanks for the pick-me-up reports from the field, Carrieyazel. It's good to know Resistance Is Not Futile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alamom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-01-07 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
25. Few Peeps Polled, Big MOE's and Many Undecideds, but on the bright side
Edited on Sat Dec-01-07 10:40 AM by Alamom



for Clinton, more than two-thirds of those questioned said Clinton, the front-runner in national polls, is the candidate most likely to win the Democratic nomination. And half of those surveyed say the senator from New York is the toughest among the Democratic White House hopefuls in standing up to Republicans.

Source: OP's article & links

These are two of the polls used to make the "Sinking ASSumption", & some info from *Zogby.
(*Current methods questionable)


Clemson University Palmetto Poll

The survey of 900 registered voters in the state, 450 in each party, found 28 percent of Republicans are undecided and 49 percent of Democrats are undecided. The survey was conducted Nov. 14-27.

CNN/WMUR New Hampshire Presidential Poll

The poll was conducted between Wednesday and Sunday. Pollsters surveyed 389 New Hampshire residents who said they'll vote in the state's 2008 Democratic primary.

The poll has a sampling error of plus or minus 5 percentage points.



editsp







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC