Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Dems voted their consciences, it would be Kucinich by a landslide

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-25-07 01:14 PM
Original message
If Dems voted their consciences, it would be Kucinich by a landslide
http://www.madison.com/tct/opinion/letters/258647

If Dems voted their consciences, it would be Kucinich by a landslide

A letter to the editor — 11/24/2007 11:33 am

Dear Editor: "Oh the candidate's a dodger,

Yes, a well-known dodger ..."

I recall these lines, penned by the sainted Lee Hays of the Weavers, when I watch the erroneously styled presidential "debates." On these ill-conceived reality shows dodging, in the sense of hedging, weaseling and equivocating, is as running and colliding are the essence of football. Three participants neither hedge nor dodge, and so they are largely ignored.

Ron Paul, Mike Gravel and Dennis Kucinich are principled opponents of wars of aggression, which is to say the Iraq war and the one against Iran that so many of the debaters say is "not off the table." Mike Gravel is in exile on the trumped-up charge of impecuniousness.

Ron Paul is tapping an enormous pool of voter discontent with perpetual war, but after bringing the troops home he would remove from government the power to do anything not specified in the Constitution. No more public works; no more public schools. No more Social Security.

Dennis Kucinich stands as the one candidate whose bred-in-the-bone beliefs about war and peace, the rights of working people, environmental integrity, and the sanctity of the Bill of Rights embody the convictions of what may be fairly called mainstream Democrats -- political heirs of the New Deal, the Fair Deal, and the best of the Great Society of Lyndon B. Johnson.

Eugene Debs said that it is "better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it." If every voter who cherishes the convictions set out above were to vote for the candidate who embraces them wholeheartedly -- the candidate he or she wants -- it would be Dennis by a landslide.

Alan Bickley, Madison
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-25-07 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Really? Live and learn. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-25-07 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. We no longer vote our conscience
Some fool coined the term "electable" so we vote that. :crazy::banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-25-07 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. If Kucinich voted his conscience, he'd still be pro-life. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. If so called "pro-life" voters had a conscience
They would be opposed to the Chimp/PNAC/DLC war agenda.

One cannot call themselves pro-life if they only care about the life inside a uterus, and not about those who have died because of the criminally insane foreign and domestic policies of the current corporatist occupiers in Washington DC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. What does that have to do with Kucinich switching his stance when it was convenient...
for him to do so?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-25-07 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. My conscience dictates that I vote for Obama.
see my sig line
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-25-07 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. Huh? I vote my conscience and it won't be Kucinich. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuckBurp Donating Member (172 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-25-07 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. I agree. I would vote for him in a heartbeat.
But, alas, I live in Texas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tejanocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-25-07 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. I love Dennis. I feel worse about our country that he's out of "their" mainstream. Whose platform do
you think is closest to Kucinich's?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onelittleindian Donating Member (70 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
24. cindy sheehan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-25-07 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
8. I believe that's true.
What Democrat's conscience prefers war to peace?

For-profit-health insurance to public health care as a right?

What Democrat's conscience values corporate profits and outsourcing over labor rights at home?

What Democrat's conscience values triangulation over PROTECTING AND DEFENDING THE CONSTITUTION OF THE US?

What Democrat's conscience prefers noble-sounding sound bites to actually walking the walk of a Democrat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stuartrida Donating Member (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-25-07 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. No thanks. He would be a mediocre President
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-25-07 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. *
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
11. I don't particularly care for Kucinich as a person, but I would like a candidate...
That takes his positions on SOME issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riqster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. I have to say, personality has become overly important to many voters
...not you specifically, but across the country. The "have a beer with" criteria et.al.

Some of the best administrators with whom I have worked have been Grade-A assholes. As long as it gets the job done, I don't care. I'm all about the results.

Affability is overrated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. It's not affability it's ability
"Personally" is perhaps not the word I should have used. I don't think Dennis has what it takes to get the job done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riqster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. Fair enough
I agree with you on the criteria, but have come to a different conclusion. May the best Dem win!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onelittleindian Donating Member (70 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. I agree
Kucinich could not run Cleveland!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bklyncowgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
13. There's a difference between agreeing with a candidate on the issues
and believing that he or she could actually do the job.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
14. I really like Dennis--but my conscience is OK with any Democratic candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
17. And then Kucinich would lose the general election by a landslide. n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
19. well, the author of that letter has zero
credibility in my eyes. Praising ron paul as principled is just bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
20. It's really sad that Kucinich's positions have been marginalized
It's been a pattern with Kucinich that he is usually vilified or marginalized -- but later is proven to have been absolutely correct. And usually his "whacky" positionms later turn out to become mainstream opinion.

Or perhaps his positions are always mainstream, but people get deluded and diverted -- as in the case of the Iraq War.

He was right on "free trade" in the 90's. Now the country is parroting him.

He was right on Iraq. Ditto.

He was right on the Patriot Act and the assault on freedom.

I suspect his position on health care is what most Americans would buy (including many health care workers except for right wingers and members of the corporate insuring and health care elite).

He'd probably be proven right on impeachment if there were enough time left in Bush's term.

It's sad that too many Democratic have abandoned such clearcut liberal and progressive positions which are truly mainstream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
21. Uh no...
Kucinich is singularly unqualified to be President...

And the fact he would consider putting a racist like Ron Paul on the ticket only confirms how completely out of touch he is...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
22. Perhaps... Prior to his alignment with Ron Paul (the dark side)
I'm disappointed yet relieved that he did this. Makes my decision so much easier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
26. Another way to say that:
If Dems ONLY CONSIDERED policy positions, and ignored other criteria like organizational ability, experience, consensus-building ability, etc., DK might win in a landslide.

Fortunately, most of us do consider things other than campaign policy statements.

I could just as legitimately say "If Dems voted their conscience, they would vote for the woman (or the Black guy)."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Yet another way to say it:
"You can't possibly disagree with me for respectable reasons."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC