Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Obama break the law?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 07:02 AM
Original message
Did Obama break the law?
How Barack Obama Broke the Law
Do you really need to put your hand on your heart during the national anthem?
By Torie Bosch

Some conservative bloggers are furious about a photo showing Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama without his hand on his heart during the playing of "The Star-Spangled Banner." Obama has countered that the photo was taken during the national anthem, not the Pledge of Allegiance—so he didn't have to. Is that true?

No. According to U.S. law, a civilian like Obama is supposed to stand up when the anthem is played, take off his hat, face the flag, and put his right hand over his heart. Members of the military can keep their hats on and salute instead of placing their hands on their hearts.

The rules of conduct regarding the anthem, the pledge, and the American flag weren't always a matter of law. At first, they were just tradition. "The Star-Spangled Banner" lyrics were originally written during the War of 1812. Later in the 19th century, the Army and Navy both began to use it during ceremonies, but it only became the congressionally recognized national anthem in 1931. Meanwhile, the Pledge of Allegiance was first used in public schools in 1892 to celebrate Columbus Day and only made it into the law books in the 1940s.
http://www.slate.com/id/2177887/?GT1=10636


TITLE 36 > Subtitle I > Part A > CHAPTER 3 > § 301
§ 301. National anthem
(a) Designation.— The composition consisting of the words and music known as the Star-Spangled Banner is the national anthem.
(b) Conduct During Playing.— During a rendition of the national anthem—
(1) when the flag is displayed—
(A) all present except those in uniform should stand at attention facing the flag with the right hand over the heart;
(B) men not in uniform should remove their headdress with their right hand and hold the headdress at the left shoulder, the hand being over the heart; and
(C) individuals in uniform should give the military salute at the first note of the anthem and maintain that position until the last note; and
(2) when the flag is not displayed, all present should face toward the music and act in the same manner they would if the flag were displayed.

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode36/usc_sec_36_00000301----000-.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bigscott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. because this is the biggest problem facing the nation these days?
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
14. WTF? Is this a rewrite of the smear emails against Obama? (nice Edwards logo in your post)
Edited on Fri Nov-16-07 08:31 AM by MethuenProgressive
We don't need this shit posted here on DU.

edit: noticed who was spreading this smear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. On the front page of MSN
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #14
31. Notice, I posted the code which says SHOULD
To me that is not a law saying that I MUST but rather a recommendation. And I was posting it hear to support his right to do as he chooses.
I will stick for any or all the candidates when they are being smeared as this obviously was intended by the corporate media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. There is also...
A picture floating around that has Bush with his hand over his stomach during the National Anthem. If the freeps think this is grounds for impeachment I'll be willing to sacrifice Obama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
3. SHOULD face, should remove, should stand--sounds like a recommendation to me.
I don't see any SHALL or MUST, nor any punishment for not following this procedure either.

Heck, they don't require it in schools; kids can sit it out if they want--if there's no penalty, it falls more in the area of a suggestion....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BushOut06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Exactly - it's not LAW, it's merely stating what they would like people to do
I don't recall anyone ever being charged for not standing or placing their hand over their heart for the anthem.

Much ado about nothing. Let the freepers work themselves into a frenzy over it, it's so far beneath our level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
26. The Supreme Court has overruled this "law" too. The First Amendment triumphs.
This does fall in the 'suggested' category. Per the very cite that started this brouhaha:

Though the procedure for listening to the national anthem is spelled out in the U.S. Code, you can't be punished for breaking the rules. That would likely be considered a violation of the First Amendment. For instance, the Supreme Court ruled that Jehovah's Witnesses had the right to skip the pledge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alofarabia Donating Member (65 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
4. That's crazy...
The law, if that's what it is, that you cite says what people "should" do, not what they must do. It's a stated preferance for action, not a requirement. And if it's free speeech to burn a flag, certainly no one could be arrested for failing to put a hand over their heart. I'm not an Obama fan, but this post is a red herring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 07:19 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. This is how they muddy the waters
They take the candidate on the left and find any little crack in their perfection and exploit it. If necessary they will make up shit.
I am no fan of Obama either but I must stick up for him here. You are correct, there is nothing in the Code that says you must cover your heart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
6. I he broke that law, I've broken it more often.
Want to cuff me now or later?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. And I plan to continue breaking that law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
7. I was mistaken then
I thought you had to extend your right arm straight out and say something like Sig Heil
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
8. Sporting Events: Law Broken At Every Game by Attendees

Next time you go to a sporting event, watch the crowd during the National Anthem. People don't take off their cap, and don't put their hands over their heart. More people do it now than before 9/11 but alot of people don't do it.

Are we going to take pictures now at sporting events and arrest people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Missed your post, yeah exactly
People just stand at games.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. Watch the athletes at a sporting event
Many if not most of them just stand there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeStateDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #8
24. The pictures are already being taken everywhere you go. Big Brother is watching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
10. I had no idea this was a law
A lot of Americans break it all the fucking time, then. Anyone who has been to a sports game of any kind knows most people just stand.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
12. OK, I say we throw Obama in jail, and *then* we go after Bush for
illegally invading a sovereign country.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hijinx87 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
15. the argument was never that it was illegal

the argument was that it was a breach of protocol that
some would find unseemly in a presidential candidate.

no harm and no foul on this one, although this does sort
of slam dunk his explanation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
17. NO ONE was facing the flag during the anthem.
ALL OF THEM SHOULD GO TO JAIL!!!!!!!

Can we get back to the real issues?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hijinx87 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. sure.

you wanna talk about tip-gate or plant-gate? :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
20. Isn't there laws about the flag not being used as decoration?
Which the one in the suspect photo obviously was AND why wasn't anyone else facing the flag? Seems ALL were at fault, Senator Tom Harkin for displaying the flag as a decoration, and every candidate who didn't address the flag.

What BS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. Flag etiquette says you should display ONE flag, not use them as 'bunting'
If you want a patriotic theme, you USE bunting--you know, that red, white and blue "runner" cloth that is used to drape stages and make backdrops...or used to be, before BushCo decided that if one flag, properly displayed and lit, was good, then FIFTY IN A BIG FUCKING ROW must be BETTTER!

Patriotism--or in the case of people complaining about this shit, FAUX patriotism: It is the last refuge of scoundrels.

FWIW, I am undecided, haven't picked a candidate yet, but bullshit is bullshit--and this kind of charge is bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. AMEN!!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MalloyLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
21. You're doing Edwards a disservice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. How?
By pointing out the right wing media attacks on the left?
I don't care which candidate they try to smear, if they are wrong, I will stand up for them and the truth.
I still support Edwards but I would like to see Obama as his running mate, but I will even defend Hillary if the attacks are not valid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
22. .. Slanderous photo
Edited on Fri Nov-16-07 10:01 AM by Truth Hurts A Lot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bright Eyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
28. Is this the best you can do?
To smear Obama?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Who said I was smearing him?"
Actually I was posting this is support of the man. Although he is not my candidate of choice, I will stick for what is right regardless.
And besides, I think he would make a great No 2 behind Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bright Eyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. Apologizes.
I must have mis-read. Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Basileus Basileon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
30. "should" is a recommendation and a statement of preference. It is not mandatory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC