Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Harry Reid--what a disgraceful, rotten, cowardly tool!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 08:17 PM
Original message
Harry Reid--what a disgraceful, rotten, cowardly tool!
http://tpmelectioncentral.com/2007/11/reid_allowed_vote_on_mukasey_in_exchange_for_military_funding_bill.php#comments

According to sources inside and outside the Democratic leadership, Harry Reid allowed a vote on Mukasey because in exchange the Republican leadership agreed to allow a vote on the big Defense Appropriations Bill, which contains $459 billion in military spending but doesn't fund the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Reid had wanted to get this bill passed before the end of this week, and in fact, the defense bill did come up for a vote late last night and was passed after the Mukasey vote.

One key reason Dem leaders wanted this defense approps bill passed, sources tell me, is that they wanted to be able to argue that they had sent a bill to the President funding the military, if not the war itself. The idea was that doing this would allow them to protect themselves in the days ahead when the battle over Iraq funding heats up and Republicans inevitably charge that Dems are refusing to fund the troops.


And why do they want to pass that defense funding without the Iraq money? So they can pretend to fight the administration once or twice before caving on that.

What a goddamn punching bag.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds like ..
trying to skid by and digging a deeper hole. That's what happens when you don't do what's right but what I've come to call.. "politically fucking expedient".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. yeah, I'm sure the GOP was going to be a major roadblock to a military spending bill....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. talk about negotiating against yourself. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. $ 459 Billion...
it's not like the Pentagon knows how to appropriate money to whatever blows up their skirts without congressional approval. How many Baghdad Bob's do we have now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Surreal, isn't it? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
6. I can negotiate better than these people and I am no negotiator...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'm so confused...
Edited on Fri Nov-09-07 09:00 PM by Mike03
Remember the all-night fillibuster? I was so excited by that, and so inspired by Harry Reid and all the other speakers.

Feinstein?

Schumer?

These people, and people like them, used to be my heroes.

What is the fucking deal here? It's getting harder and harder to even know who to trust.

Am I losing my mind?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Yes, they seemed to exhibit more spine when they were in the minority.
Now they don't want to rock boats, with the shape this country is in?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. It's "Politics as Usual" .....trading votes for what you don't want for what you DO!
That must be what Harry and Nancy are good at...because it isn't anything else... Both are weak and ineffectual speakers. What does that say? WHO RUNS THEM? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluerum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
10. the appropriations shell game - once they get the $$$ they will spend it where they want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC