Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Edwards Campaign Statement on Senator Clinton's Damage Control Efforts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
JohnLocke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 04:04 PM
Original message
Edwards Campaign Statement on Senator Clinton's Damage Control Efforts
Edwards Campaign Statement on Senator Clinton's Damage Control Efforts
John Edwards for President
Thursday, November 1, 2007

----
Chapel Hill, North Carolina – Today, Edwards for President communications director Chris Kofinis released the following statement on Senator Clinton's post-debate damage control efforts:

"All the distractions in the world won't undo the fact that on Tuesday night millions of Americans saw John Edwards speak honestly and directly, while Senator Clinton once again took multiple positions on multiple issues. We understand that the Clinton campaign isn't happy about that, but instead of smoke and mirrors, how about some truth-telling? Forty-eight hours after the debate, we have lots of excuses, but we still don't have a yes or no answer to a yes or no question.

"That's not the 'politics of piling on,' it's the politics of parsing.

"After seven years of George Bush, the American people deserve better — they deserve the truth."

http://johnedwards.com/news/press-releases/20071101-damage-control/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. John Edwards speaking honesty and directly? When did that happen?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. it's better than whining
and hearing the southern accent of his get deeper and deeper the more desperate he becomes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benny05 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I wish DU'ers would quit picking on Southern Accents
It comes across as condescending, as though only northern or midwestern accents are the only acceptable ones. John Edwards always says we shouldn't look down on anyone because of the family we were born into or the color our skin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. you're right
we should just stick to taking opportunities handed to us on silver platters by moderators with an agenda to gang up on someone and then go out and take more money from some trial lawyers or a hedge fund, right?

(sorry, nothing personal, but I'm a little pissed about my Senator Schumer approving Mukasey and inappropriately directing my anger. Doesn't make it right, but at least I'm aware of it and tacitly apologizing, for what it's worth)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Better to take money from trial lawyers who fight big buisiness rather than from big buisiness. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. but not so good
when you highlight your opponent's taking of funds while (hypocritically perhaps?) taking similar funds yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. benny, when you 'put on' the accent, it deserves contempt.
Edwards puts on and takes off his accent depending on the situation.
It's as phony as an Obama y'all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. I've never heard him "take off" his accent
When did that happen? He always sounds very Carolinan to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. Just to spread the bias around, I can't stand
Texan accents. But if it's someone whose politics I like, I can forgive it (Molly Ivins, for instance).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Whining? I hardly call this whining.
The truth IS what it is.

If you don't like it, you're probably supporting the right candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Here's an interesting take on Edwards' comments
and video:

"When you compare Edwards' own statement to Clinton's, things get even more complicated. Edwards on Iraq at the Dartmouth debate, when he also said he couldn't commit to 2013, as well as beyond:"

Edwards in MSNBC paid time: "It is time to end this war."

Edwards on "Meet the Press": "Unless we're going to close the embassy in Baghdad, and have the only American embassy in the world that we provide no protection for, there have to some troops in Baghdad for protecting the embassy. ... We do need to maintain quick reaction forces just outside Iraq. ... .. That quick reaction force would be focused on the possibility of Al Qaeda operations."

Edwards at Dartmouth debate: "I think the problem is -- and it's what you just heard discussed -- is we will maintain an embassy in Baghdad. That embassy has to be protected. We will probably have humanitarian workers in Iraq. Those humanitarian workers have to be protected." - John Edwards

Sound familiar?

Is that Edwards' "double-talk" or the "politics of parsing," or did I miss something?


http://www.taylormarsh.com/


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. He has never said he'd keep combat troops in Iraq
And as for keeping forces outside Iraq as a quick reaction force, if necessary, his idea is that it's a bad idea to keep combat forces to fight Al Qaeda inside Iraq, because, well, it means we're still occupying Iraq. I don't see any contradiction in Edwards saying it is time to end the war and the statements you quote. I DO see a contradiction when Obama and HRC say they will end the war but say they will keep combat troops in to fight Al Qaeda. HRC and Obama have also said they will keep troops in Iraq to continue to train Iraqi forces. Edwards has never said he would do this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-03-07 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #4
22. Taylor Marsh is right on, as usual. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Once John Edwards opportunistically flip-flops, he's committed dammit! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. oh man
:rofl: SNAP!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. Clinton gave an answer over Johnny's head - and it's the high point of his campaign!!
She gave a nuanced, complicated and thoughtful answer to a difficult question - and Edwards nearly shit himself jumping up and down in Ecstasy trying to get the camera's attention. And that's his "debate highlight." How sad for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inspired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Nuanced? Complicated? Thoughtful? Is this the spin?
What a joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Nuanced + complicated + thoughtful - difficult = Waffle
Simple math :D

Oh, and I am Woman Hear Me Roar....at Hillary pulling the gender card.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-03-07 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #15
23. The opposite of nuance
is wingnut "its either black or white" droolerism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. What the hell is he talking about?
What multiple positions on multiple issues? I'm supporting JE, but this is BS.

Oh, well...that's campaigning for ya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. You could try these
"Senator Clinton says that she believes she can be the candidate for change, but she defends a broken system that's corrupt in Washington, D.C.

She says she will end the war, but she continues to say she'll keep combat troops in Iraq and continue combat missions in Iraq.
To me, that's not ending the war, that's a continuation of the war.

She says she'll stand up to George Bush on Iran. She just said it again. And, in fact, she voted to give George Bush the first step in moving militarily on Iran -- and he's taken it. Bush and Cheney have taken it. They have now declared the Iranian Revolutionary Guard a terrorist organization and a proliferator of weapons of mass destruction.
I think we have to stand up to this president.

And then, finally, she said in our last debate that she was against any changes on Social Security -- benefits, retirement aid, or raising the cap on the Social Security tax -- but apparently, it's been reported that she said privately something different than that." ---John Edwards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. I would have expected you to give me quotes from Hillary
Quoting from Edwards doesn't mean a thing when I'm questioning his statements to begin with.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-03-07 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #14
24. How about public financing?
Is that defending a corrupt system?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC