Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Do Republicans Think Hillary Clinton Will Be Nominated?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 03:56 PM
Original message
Poll question: Why Do Republicans Think Hillary Clinton Will Be Nominated?
Virtually every time one of the GOP candidates opens his pasty trap, they take for granted that Sen. Clinton will be the Democratic nominee. In fact, they often try to differentiate themselves by attacking Clinton instead of each other - it's following the Reagan quip about never attacking "thy fellow Republican."

There seems to be two possible explanations for this phenomenon:

1. They are preparing themselves for the inevitable. Polls and endorsements don't lie.

2. They are invoking the Clinton dynasty to whip up the spirits of demoralized conservatives who long for someone to focus their personal frustration on. Not only are they trying to stir up some sort of focal point for the embodiment of all that is evil, but they are making a pretty calculated effort to drive up fundraising.

On our side of the coin, Democrats invoke Dick Cheney or Ann Coulter anytime they want to get some spare change. Remember the good old days of hating Tom Delay? Good times. Putting the "checks" in "checks and balances" and what have you.

Not being a manichean zealot, I'd assume there is a little of both going on. Clinton is the frontrunner, after all.

That too is a simplification, though, since it would be like the classic claim that both Dems and Republicans took money from Enron. There is something to be said for clarifying proportion (wouldn't be nice if the media understood this principle?).

So, without trying to say these are mutually exclusive possibilities, I'm asking which you believe is the stronger rationale for invoking the name of Hillary Clinton, Hillarycare, etc.

Explanations are always welcome, naturally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Can I vote for both?
they don't really have much control over it, but they'll always find a way to capitalize on anything. call them the eternal optimists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. It should be "Wish" and not "Think"
The best thing for the Republicans is to have two Clintons to run against. It's what they want. Otherwise, they are sunk.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. That's Why Newt Gingrich Says She Has A 80% Chance Of Winning
And Dick Morris and Neil Bored were discussing an HRC candidacy as a fait accompli...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. Because their rightwing media is trumpeting her.
She's the pick of the right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. because the media anointed her so a year ago and have been pushing her ever since
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seasat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. Because they're still stuck in the 90s.
They feel their influence slipping away and are trying to turn back the clock to 1990 when they still held some sway. They haven't any real policy to run on other than a retread of the 2004 theme of Al Queeda is hiding under your bed. They can't run on dingleberry's record since his poll numbers and policies are toxic. They can only hope to revival of the Bill Clinton is evil theme by attacking Hillary. They're really setting themselves up for a fall if Hillary slips up and another one of our candidates ends up with the nomination. They'll have already geared up for Hillary attacks and it'll take some time to regroup and coordinate a new attack on a different candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC