Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

123 Silent Congress Members

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
davidswanson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 11:05 AM
Original message
123 Silent Congress Members
Edited on Thu Oct-18-07 11:10 AM by davidswanson
Over two years ago, the following 123 Democratic Congress Members did something extraordinary.

Abercrombie; Allen; Baird; Baldwin; Becerra; Berkley; Bishop; Blumenauer; Brown, Corrine; Brown, Sherrod; Butterfield; Capps; Capuano; Carson; Christensen; Clay; Cleaver; Clyburn; Conyers; Cooper; Cummings; Davis, Danny; Davis, Susan; DeFazio; DeGette; Delahunt; DeLauro; Dingell; Doggett; Doyle; Eshoo; Farr; Fattah; Filner; Ford; Frank; Green; Grijalva; Gutierrez; Hastings; Hinchey; Holt; Honda; Hooley; Inslee; Jackson; Jackson-Lee; Jefferson; Johnson, Eddie Bernice; Kaptur; Kennedy; Kildee; Kilpatrick; Kucinich; Larsen, Rick; Larson, John; Lee, Barbara; Levin; Lewis; Lofgren; Maloney; Markey; Matsui; McCarthy; McDermott; McGovern; McKinney; McNulty; Meehan; Meek; Meeks; Michaud; Millender-McDonald; Miller, Brad; Miller, George; Moore, Gwen; Moran; Nadler; Napolitano; Neal; Oberstar; Olver; Owens; Pallone; Pascrell; Pastor; Payne; Pelosi; Price, David; Rangel; Rothman; Rush; Sanchez, Linda; Sanders; Schakowsky; Scott, Bobby; Serrano; Sherman; Skelton; Slaughter; Smith, Adam; Solis; Stark; Strickland; Tauscher; Thompson, Bennie; Tierney; Towns; Tubbs Jones; Udall, Mark; Udall, Tom; Van Hollen; Velazquez; Wasserman Schultz; Waters; Watson; Watt; Waxman; Weiner; Wexler; Woolsey; Wu; Wynn.

They delivered a letter, also signed by over half a million other Americans, to the White House. The letter asked the following questions about the Downing Street Minutes:

1) Do you or anyone in your administration dispute the accuracy of the leaked document?
2) Were arrangements being made, including the recruitment of allies, before you sought congressional authorization to go to war?
3) Was there an effort to create an ultimatum about weapons inspectors in order to help with the justification for the war, as the minutes indicate?
4) At what point in time did you and Prime Minster Blair first agree it was necessary to invade Iraq?
5) Was there a coordinated effort with the US intelligence community and/or British officials to “fix” intelligence and facts around the policy, as the leaked document states?

One of the 123 signers of that letter has for the past 10 months been the Speaker of the House of Representatives. She and the other 122 have, for 10 months, gone completely silent on the matter.

Following up on the letter, 84 Congress Members did something else. They signed onto a privileged Resolution of Inquiry sponsored by Congresswoman Barbara Lee "requesting the President and directing the Secretary of State to transmit to the House of Representatives not later than 14 days after the date of the adoption of this resolution all information in the possession of the President and the Secretary of State relating to communication with officials of the United Kingdom between January 1, 2002, and October 16, 2002, relating to the policy of the United States with respect to Iraq."

After a huge effort by citizens to drive the issue forward, the resolution came within a vote or two of passing the House International Relations Committee but failed. An identical fate met a second resolution sponsored by Congressman Dennis Kucinich and taken to the House International Relations Committee by Lee. This one had 110 signatures "requesting the President of the United States and directing the Secretary of State to provide to the House of Representatives certain documents in their possession relating to the White House Iraq Group."

Neither Lee nor Kucinich has reintroduced these resolutions. In their defense, they and a total of 22 congress members have signed onto a bill that cuts to the chase and proposes the impeachment of Dick Cheney. But where are the roughly 100 members of Congress who claimed to want to know the truth when Republicans controlled the House and its committees? What is the House Intelligence Committee doing other than wasting time on destructive bills that are signed into law and decent ones that are vetoed? What is the House International Relations Committee doing? Where is John Conyers? And where in the world is Nancy Pelosi?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. the silence is deafening
and more scary than any shouting could ever be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. any republican bill whihc comes within 2 vtes of passing will stay there and be forced down people's
throats until it passes. (yes, i know, one or two votes in committee is different than one or 2 votes in congress.)
Only dems walk away when a bill doesn't get through.

But the answer is probably the "new democrats" and their deals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. Pelosi is out to lunch, that's where she is.
I don't know about Conyers. He's a mystery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. k&r (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T.Ruth2power Donating Member (371 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. Silence also speaks
and in this case it speaks of complicity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Usrename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. Their silence is evidence of complicity.
It may not be possible to bring criminal charges against them for their passive participation, but they sure as hell are guilty when the Nuremberg principles are applied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just-plain-Kathy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. Why wouldn't it be possible to bring criminal charges against them for their passive participation?
How do we as citizens get the ball rolling to bring them all up on criminal charges?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
puebloknot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. Kick and Recommend! Thanks for your efforts, as always. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelSansCause Donating Member (304 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. wow
this is quite enlightening. obviously, somewhere, in some smoke-filled room the decision was made that the democrats would look bad or some such thing. i mean, when did things like the TRUTH about bushco's horrible lies become important? argh incredibly disillusioned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. Hi RebelSansCause
Welcome to DU! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psyop Samurai Donating Member (873 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
9. bzzzzt... MEMORY HOLE ERROR...
repeat,

MEMORY HOLE ERROR...
____________________


please return to your regularly scheduled programming...

we regret any inconvenience...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. yeah... sadly.
the fact that the OP brings up is troubling and makes one wonder, doesn't it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psyop Samurai Donating Member (873 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. "Invasion of the Body Snatchers" comes to mind...
I'm just glad that Mr. Swanson (and a bunch of other great folks) are able to articulate these things better than I could, even though I know them in my bones, and know I'm not crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
12. kicking, sadly. . . . . .n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Synnical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
14. Simple but strong post
Thanks. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
16. God only knows...
Edited on Fri Oct-19-07 09:39 AM by redqueen
:shrug:

horse trading, complicity, threats/coercion, etc.

I'd love to find out... but I doubt we will. At least not anytime soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
17. So many are able to disregard this
when ranting against Democrats who don't want to play ball with the Democratic establishment this election cycle.

Kind of like the way so many Democratic congresspeople have done.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr. Ected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
18. Our Disappointment Is No Concern To Them
They know we will always vote Democratic before pulling the lever for a Republican.

Accountability and principles seem to be a thing of the past for most of our Congresspersons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC