Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I contacted my Senator and asked why she voted for Kyle-Lieberman

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 03:30 PM
Original message
I contacted my Senator and asked why she voted for Kyle-Lieberman
Senator Patty Murray - Seattle Office.

The Staffer gave a well rehearsed response (slightly paraphrased with my memory) as follows: Senator Murray voted for it after language was taking out that could give President Bush any chance to justify military action.

Staffer went on...

Senator Murray has consistently been a supporter of diplomatic sanctions against Iran and that is all this amendment was; it states that we have concerns about Iran and we wanted to express the sense of the Senate about them.

I shared with this staffer that Patty Murray is assuming that Shrub knows how to read English; and that the BushCo regime will extrapolate the language to justify ANY DAMN WAR they want. Giving Shrub any further authority to sanction Iran is provocative and just took us one step closer to war.

I added that there is extreme disappointment in DEMS on The Hill that seemingly have sold out their principles which brought them into power in the first place, and in particular using the anti-war rhetoric that got them elected in 2006.

Staffer responded...

Thank you for your comments, I will pass them along to Sen, Murray.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
txaslftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Because she wanted to keep her seat.
This was an AIPAC make or break vote.

You don't vote no on those.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. She is in no danger of losing her seat, except from this.
Usually she votes the way I would, this one surprised me. She is in no danger. Cantwell, our other senator, is in danger and voted no on Lieberman/Kyl, all of which is odd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txaslftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. She's looking ahead. She knows that AIPAC has the ability
to kill her presidential bid if she doesn't play by the rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lligrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. In Other Words, She Voted For A Stupid, Meaningless
piece of trash. We don't need any legislation passed to support Israel. We support them when they are right and don't when they are wrong. Why would we do any differently?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txaslftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. No. We support them right or wrong.
That's our current history, and includes both Democrats and Republicans. There is no divide on this issue in Washington. Both parties agree that Israel can do no wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. I called Bingaman and
said thank you for not supporting Kyl-Lieberman!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
5. I should do that - my Senator IS Kyl
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zandor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
6. So what the resolution actually said didn't matter
just your extrapolations?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. With that reasoning, Congress should not pass ANY legislation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC