Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dems reaching out to evangelical voters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 06:45 AM
Original message
Dems reaching out to evangelical voters
The Miracle Workers
For 25 years, evangelicals have voted Republican. But the Democrats are courting, and their efforts may have a prayer.


By Eve Conant
Newsweek

Oct. 1, 2007 issue - Richard land had never met one-on-one with a chairman of the Democratic National Committee. The Tennessee evangelist, an influential force in the Southern Baptist Convention, generally views such people as adversaries, if not enemies. So consider his surprise when, at a non-partisan leadership conference over the New Year's holiday, Howard Dean leaned in and said he'd love to get together for a private chat. Land agreed to meet for coffee at a downtown Washington hotel. He was wary: "I brought a witness," he jokes now. Dean was there to chip away at Land's loyalty to the GOP, and strangely, Land found himself warming to the liberal Democrat. Among other things, he admired Dean's frugality. "He hauled his own suitcase around, and the Capitol Hill Suites isn't exactly fancy," Land tells NEWSWEEK. "I was impressed." More important, the two men had something to talk about, and did so cordially. "Dean told me how the Democrats were pro-life in that they wanted a country in which abortion was rare. I said, 'I agree, but we disagree how to get there.' Still, it was certainly a change in tone."

For the Democrats, it's a change in tactics as well—an audacious, if not quixotic, effort to win over a constituency that has been solidly Republican for a quarter century. Dean and other Democratic strategists hope to take advantage of deepening discontent with the GOP among some evangelicals. As a movement, conservative Christians have yet to get fired up about any of the leading Republican presidential candidates. There was a brief wave of enthusiasm for Fred Thompson, but that may be ebbing. One of the nation's most influential evangelicals, James Dobson, wrote a scathing e-mail about Thompson, obtained by the Associated Press last week, in which he objected to the candidate's opposition to a constitutional marriage amendment and said Thompson had "no passion, no zeal." Meanwhile, Mitt Romney suffers among some evangelicals because of bias against his Mormon faith. Front runner Rudy Giuliani leaves conservative Christians particularly cold. "If the Republicans are foolish enough to nominate the pro-choice Giuliani, that will give the Democratic Party license to hunt for evangelical votes," says Land, who has been contacted by both the Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton campaigns. "I don't know how successful they'll be, but at least they'll have that license."

No one expects miracles, of course. Conservative Christians started shifting to the Republicans as the "party of values" in 1979, when Jerry Falwell founded the Moral Majority. They were the most important bloc of voters in George W. Bush's victories in 2000 and 2004. But the movement is not as cohesive as it once was. Many younger evangelicals are worried about issues beyond the traditional struggles over abortion, school prayer and gay marriage. They're becoming vocal about the environment, AIDS, poverty and genocide—a newer set of "values" that Democrats are more comfortable addressing.

he Democrats see an opening—not to conquer the movement but to harness some of its energy for themselves. "In the past, we've come off as dismissive to evangelicals," Dean tells NEWSWEEK. "But our party has become much more comfortable talking about faith and values." Dean has met with four or five influential evangelicals in addition to Land, sometimes visiting their offices to talk. "Are we going to abandon Roe v. Wade? No. But a lot can be done to prevent teen pregnancy and abortions. There is a lot we do agree on." The DNC under Dean has stepped up its Faith in Action initiative, an outreach program created in the wake of the Democrats' 2004 defeat. Run by a Pentecostal minister, it has trained about 150 people.

Such efforts, along with general disillusionment with Bush, may have already paid off. According to a Pew Research Center survey in February, support for Democratic candidates among white evangelicals under 30 jumped from 16 to 26 percent between the 2004 and 2006 elections. Some evangelical leaders now say they're tired of being viewed as an appendage of the GOP, or any other party. "We want to be viewed as we are—people of faith—not a political bloc," says Leith Anderson, president of the National Association of Evangelicals.

more...

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20920353/site/newsweek/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
orpupilofnature57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. Stop pandering!!!! Start remembering the TRUTH ,Believe me....
If their true Christians ,They'll recognize the Truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
divineorder Donating Member (513 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. It'a Not Pandering to Reach Out
And see if there are voters on the other side who are at least receptive to some other issues. At stake are older voters-the old Reagan Democrats, who while waning in number, still turn out and vote. They may not agree on social liberalism, but they may agree on things such as health care and the importance of unions and the environment. Also the Republican Party's outreach (of sorts) to Black Churchgoers are also because of not being able to speak to evangelicals as well.

People forget that many evangelicals are not necessarily Southern either. Rural parts of blue states can be quite evangelical too, and helping the Dems be able to talk to them is important for statewide victories.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. I wish they'd try reaching out to their base. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orpupilofnature57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. My wife an atheiest say's the same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
5. ewwwwww
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RFKJrNews Donating Member (760 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Fake Faith or the Real Thing? It's easy to tell the difference.
Edited on Sun Sep-23-07 08:09 AM by RFKin2008
With so many politicians pandering to the interests of the religious right, too often promising anything they think will get the Christian vote (while ignoring the most basic of Christian values), it’s so refreshing to hear what Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has to say. When he speaks of faith, one not only feels that he is talking from the heart, but that the convictions he holds are truly his own.

He recently gave a remarkable speech about "keeping the faith" at the shrine of St. Francis in San Francisco. I like his thoughts on the role of faith in a progressive society. You can read his remarks here:

http://rfkin2008.wordpress.com/2007/09/17/rfk-jr-keeps-the-faith/

(Sighs) That's the sort of talk I like to hear from a candidate. Wish to God he'd run for President!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
7. Democratic support for women's rights forces 'em away every time.
"I just can't vote for someone who supports abortion."

I can't tell you how many times I've heard variations of that from so-called religious people.

When I try to tell them that Repuke policies cause MUCH more death (Not to mention more abortions), their eyes glaze over with the satisfaction that I'm going to Hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. But the deaths of millions is A-OK. I take satisfaction in the knowledge
that they are twisted, not me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Then point out that republicans
use anti choice rhetoric to get votes.Reps are much more interested in getting people to vote against their own economic interests by using wedge issues that sit on the back burner once they get to Washington.Point out that their personal beliefs may prevent them from being pro choice,but the laws in our country are based on an individuals right to privacy and freedom.Ask them what the republicans have really done to advance their anti choice agenda as opposed to advancing economic policies that have caused real life destruction to the middle and working class in this country. Point out the ruse,over and over again until people realize they are being played for fools.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sampsonblk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
8. Howard Dean kicks ass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
11. The party of concentrated wealth vs the party of helping people. What took so long?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC