Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Keith Olbermann directly attacks Edwards

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LBJDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 07:16 PM
Original message
Keith Olbermann directly attacks Edwards
Olbermann rudely injected himself into Edwards' response to Biden's attack by saying, "Aren't you from a right to work state?"

Is it Olbermann's job to cross-examine candidates and ask his own questions? Why is he trashing the most economically progressive candidate of the big three?

Why? Because General Electric's paying his ass.

Yeah, he's good when it comes to criticizing the war (that doesn't cost Wall Street much); but he doesn't give a flying f--k about the working man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mantis Donating Member (535 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow
I'm shocked!! Didn't ya know....only the forces known as Clobama have a right to be President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Not Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. Fair question, though
I think KO was a little pissed at him for ignoring the time limits on two previous questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LBJDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Edwards was a senator, not a governor
He had no power over North Carolina's labor laws. Not a fair question, more like an ambush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
21. It could be something standardized, but Edwards didn't
do anything about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
22. Why? You gave the obvious answer and I would guess Edwards was able to say so as well.
Ï do not agree with the law in my state". What is difficult in that? Do you expect that every single question to candidates have to be easy and nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Could be...
Seems Keith's finding it a bit nerve wrecking to moderate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mantis Donating Member (535 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. oh come on
Has ANYONE followed the time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
36. For the part I watched
Most ran over the time a little. Edwards ran over the limit by quite a bit and didn't even seem to care.

There's a difference in taking a few extra seconds to finish a sentence, and going off on a whole 'nother paragraph of a stump speech.

(disclaimer: I don't have a first choice who's in the race, and I could end up supporting Edwards. But he did go way over the time on at least one question, and ignored Olbermann telling him his time was up.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sailor65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. I agree
And once when Keith tried to stop him, Edwards jumped and said "Let me finish this."
It didn't do much for Edwards' stock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jimdish25 Donating Member (128 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
32. Legit Question
He handled it just fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
34. EXACTLY.
I didn't watch much of the debate myself - between Edwards ignoring the time limits and all of them (except Richardson, in the bit I watched) refusing to answer the question asked of them so that they could answer a question that wasn't asked of them....I freakin' gave up.

I think the idea of asking a question to only one candidate and everyone getting different questions is a lousy format, but I would have been more impressed by the candidates if each would have given good answers to the questions that were asked of them. I think it was disrespectful to the questioner when the candidate blew off the question asked in order to make a totally unrelated point that the candidate felt was more important to the candidate.

Back to Olbermann / Edwards... Edwards totally disrespected the time limit (in the case I saw) and I don't see anything wrong with what Olbermann asked, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think he's doing an admirable job.
You can tell he's a bit uncomfortable with the boisterous, vocal crowd. Imagine if Chris Matthews or Tim Russert or (gasp) Brit Hume were moderating this thing!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mutineer Donating Member (659 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
31. Other moderators have told the crowds and the candidates
to behave. Keith should have done the same.

And how the heck is it Edwards fault that NC, a Republican-controlled state, a right-to-work state? Most southern states are anti-union right? A U.S. Senator can't change state law. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. I thought that was odd too...
Hope you're not right about the reason ~ but it makes sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MessiahRp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. It was a fair question
Keith isn't moderating to pander to one candidate or another (like Edwards just did to the Unions), he's there to be a moderator who asks the tough questions.

Apparently KO isn't cool to you unless he is like FOX is with Republicans and fellates the Democratic Candidates.

Rp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mutineer Donating Member (659 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
35. And the baseball/steroid question was a tough question?
Please. Edwards has zero control over what the state legislature or the climate towards unions is like within the state of N.C. as a U.S. Senator. And I sure as heck didn't see him following up on any of this other questions to other candidates the way he did with Edwards. WHY?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inspired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think Edwards handled it well though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. Actually that was to HELP Edwards
Biden had just made the point that he (Biden) had a good record in spite of being from a right to work state. Edwards had not thought to say that he had been in the same situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LBJDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Hmm. Maybe you're right
To me, it sounded like, "How can you be pro-union when you're tied to a right-to-work system?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mantis Donating Member (535 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. hmm
yeah good point. By the way, I find Dennis to be pretty cool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. The senator from MBNA is the most economically progressive?
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LBJDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Relative to Clobama?
By far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
draft_mario_cuomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #13
29. Ask Wall Street. How much many are they giving to Biden? How much to Clobama?
Clobama beat every Republican on Wall Street. Obama raised almost as much as Clinton, Giuliani, and Romney combined on Wall Street.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. I agree

Rec
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MalloyLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
27. It worked to Edwards advantage. If anyone was a prick, it was Biden!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #27
37. Not sure about that...
his answer was somewhat strident, I agree. On the other hand, he was contrasting his long and consistent record with Edwards' shorter, possibly campaign-motivated, and possibly less consistent (I do not know for sure, so I may be worng here).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harper_is_Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
14. Poor John. Why can't KO be nice to him?
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
15. I'm and edwards supporter, and I really didn't feel it was attack..it
was a question that all the talking heads will be asking..so it gave him a chance to answer..at least that is the way I see it, and I could be wrong..on one of his programs I thought he liked edwards..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. It was a softball. Keith threw Edwards a lifeline. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
18. You would think that KO would know Edwards was a Senator, not a Governor
KO was unfairly attacking Edwards. That was obvious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
20. Uhhh... no.... he asked the question because it was correct.
Geesch. If Edwards can't take care of himself, he shouldn't be running.

Edwards IS from a right to be fired, I mean, right to work state. And so am I - next door. I hate it, but, as is the case with all of Edwards grandstanding, he gives lip service to good ideals, but did NOTHING about them when he was a senator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. OT - but just had to comment that those are extremely cute kids
Great photo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mutineer Donating Member (659 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #20
38. what do you want him to do about them?
I grew up in a right-to-work state (although a member of a union household and currently a union (weak though) member myself). The ideas of anti-labor laws are so entrenched in the culture of these right-to-work states that there is very sadly not a hell of a lot that a senator can do to change them. State governments are so desperate to lure industries/businesses to their states that they don't want unions in them so they are better able to attract them. That's the political reality of it.

And p.s. Olbermann was a horrible moderator. He had zero crowd control, at times he had zero candidate control. the question to Obama about Bonds was not only stupid, it was patrionizing. Hey, let's ask the only black man in the field a question about another black man--don't they all know each other? Love his show, but this debate sucked ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
23. Wasn't an attack. It was a softball. And Edwards hit it out of the park. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
26. "he's good when it comes to criticizing the war (that doesn't cost Wall Street much); "
You checked Halliburton's stock price lately? Wall Street is making big money off this war.

I took the question the way one of the above poster's did. Biden mentioned he was from a right to work state but still prolabor, I think KO was giving Edwards the same chance. I sure didn't see it as an attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
28. Edwards can handle the tough questions -- and people need to hear his answers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LBJDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
30. I just noticed a certain Biden plant on this forum
Trash Edwards for being from a right-to-work state. It's pretty clear that Olbermann was doing the bidding of the establishment. Fuck him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. Ahh a microcosm of a bigger problem
This is all we've been doing lately. Ohh I hated that one thing. Fuck him/her. They suck. Boooo! Etc.

It's time to grow up people. Not everyone is going to believe everything you think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC