Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

33 Congress Members for Impeachment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
davidswanson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 06:28 AM
Original message
33 Congress Members for Impeachment
By David Swanson

I ran into Congressman Donald Payne Tuesday evening and asked him if he would sign on to cosponsor H Res 333, articles of impeachment against Vice President Dick Cheney. He said yes immediately and brought his legislative director in on the conversation. They both said yes, as a matter of course, as if all they'd been waiting for was someone to ask them. Now, I know that's not quite the case, and that citizens of New Jersey have been lobbying Payne and other New Jersey Congress Members intensely. Still, it makes me wonder how many Congress Members might back impeachment if people just got to them, face-to-face, and asked.

Well, here's your chance to find out. Congress is taking the next month off. Congress Members will be in their districts. They'll be near your house. They have offices near your house. Now is the time to ask them to cosponsor H Res 333 or introduce their own articles of impeachment against Cheney. If they agree to cosponsor H Res 333, you should contact Congressman Dennis Kucinich's office and let him know. If they do not agree, you should make a bunch of big posters that say "Honk to Impeach" and stand on the street corner in front of your Congress Member's office. Or you should sit in their office, read the Constitution out loud, and refuse to leave. August is your time to make your message clear. 54% of Americans want Cheney impeached, and 40% do not. See how many of that 54% you can bring with you to your representative's office.

If we add Congressman Payne's name to the official list of cosponsors of H Res 333, including the original sponsor, Kucinich, we get a total of 16 principled men and women standing for the impeachment of Dick Cheney. They are: Jan Schakowsky, Maxine Waters, Hank Johnson, Keith Ellison, Lynn Woolsey, Barbara Lee, Albert Wynn, William Lacy Clay, Dennis Kucinich, Yvette Clarke, Jim McDermott, Jim Moran, Bob Filner, Sam Farr, Robert Brady, and Donald Payne.

Meanwhile, two Congress Members have recently said that they support the impeachment of Cheney and Bush, but have not yet signed onto any bills: Jesse Jackson Jr., and Maurice Hinchey. While they should be asked immediately to put their signatures where their mouths are, we can go ahead and include them in our count of Congress Members for impeachment, bringing the total to 18.

On Tuesday, Congressman Jay Inslee introduced or announced he would soon introduce a bill to impeach Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. Inslee says he has 15 cosponsors, including himself. Neither Inslee nor anyone else I can find provides a full list of those 15 names, but 11 of them are: Jay Inslee, Xavier Becerra, Michael Arcuri, Ben Chandler, Dennis Moore, Bruce Braley, Tom Udall, Earl Blumenauer, Peter DeFazio, Hank Johnson, Steve Cohen. Of those 11, only one, Hank Johnson, is already on our list of impeachment supporters. Assuming that he is the only one of the 15 already on our list, we can add 14 to 18 and reach a total of 32 Congress Members now backing the impeachment of either Cheney or Gonzales or both.

Bringing the grand total to 33 is none other than the Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, who said on Tuesday that if she were not the Speaker she would probably be backing impeachment. Word to the wise: other congress members should do as she would do, not as she advises.

It is likely that most or all of the supporters of H Res 333 will sign onto Inslee's bill, assuming – again – that somebody asks them. And supporters of Inslee's bill can now be added to the list of priority Members to lobby to sign onto H Res 333. Of special note is freshman Congressman Steve Cohen because he serves on the House Judiciary Committee. With the addition of his name, there are now four members of the Judiciary Committee on our list of 33, two for impeaching Cheney, one for impeaching Gonzales, and one for impeaching both of them.

Congressman Payne is an interesting addition as well. Payne holds the same seat in Congress that was once held by Peter Rodino, the Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee who led the passage of articles of impeachment against President Richard Nixon.

In addition to Inslee's cosponsors, it's possible to create a list of priority Members to be lobbied on impeaching Cheney. By combining the lists of those who seem most likely to sign on (primarily those who cosponsored H Res 635 in the last Congress) with those on the Judiciary Committee who seem most likely to sign on, we arrive at this list:

John Hall, Maurice Hinchey, Jesse Jackson Jr., Diane Watson, Sheila Jackson Lee, John Lewis, Steve Cohen, Neil Abercrombie, Tammy Baldwin, Lois Capps, Michael Capuano, Danny Davis, Chaka Fattah, Michael Honda, Carolyn Maloney, Betty McCullom, Gwen Moore, James Oberstar, John Olver, Steven Rothman, Martin Sabo, Hilda Solis, Pete Stark, John Tierney, Nydia Velazquez, David Wu, Bill Delahunt, Bobby Scott, Artur Davis, Mel Watt, Luis Gutierrez, Zoe Lofgren, Robert Wexler, Linda Sanchez, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, Jerrold Nadler, John Conyers.

These are not people who have suggested or even hinted that they are willing to step up and support the Constitution. But they are the most likely and most important to do so.

Any Congress Members afraid that the media will pillory them for calling Cheney a liar should watch this video from Tuesday in which Cheney lies to CNN and, much more remarkably, CNN suggests that Cheney lied: http://afterdowningstreet.org/cheney2

Any Congress Member still unwilling to get behind impeaching Cheney, should at the very least sign on for the impeachment of an Attorney General who openly lies to Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. "if she were not the Speaker she would ... backing impeachment"
... how about BECAUSE YOU ARE THE SPEAKER you SHOULD back impeachment, Ms. Pelosi???


:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. A classic line if ever there was one
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lazer47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. That is 33 intelligent people,, and about 400 Dumasses
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. Thanks David.
Looks like we still have to make another hard push. In their face and making requests it seems is what we have to do continually until that push becomes reality. Thanks for this and what you do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
6. I'm glad to see an expanded focus.
Still, it makes me wonder how many Congress Members might back impeachment if people just got to them, face-to-face, and asked.

Thank you. :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
7. out of iraq causus
why aren't all the member of the out of iraq caucus singed on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidswanson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. maxine has not
asked them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. aaaarrrrggghhhh
maxine who walked around saying impeach, impeach, impeach before the election? yeah, that maxine. arrrggghhhhh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
8. Why hasn't a delegation of top Congressional GOP leaders,
seeing that Bush is completely undermining the GOP not to mention the Constitution and the country, done what Goldwater did with Nixon, by paying a visit to Bush with a large dose of reality and a big "boot?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. Because they're too stupid to save their own asses?
I guess :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. The Old Republican Guard is red-flagging us about the Bushies
Edited on Wed Aug-01-07 03:39 PM by lebkuchen
saying "'something's in the works' to trigger a police state." Paul Roberts, a former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury under Reagan, thinks that the reason the dems won't go for impeachment, which he believes is completely justified, is because the dems consider Bush the GOP's worst enemy in the next election, and would rather sit it out for a big win. Roberts says that the Bushies know the GOP will lose all so are preparing for a dictatorship govt. to maintain control. .

If the Old Republicans sense/know that a police state is being prepared for, that Cheney will stop at nothing, why don't senior Republican congressmen know this, so that they can excise the Bushies ahead of time? In not taking action, it means to me that senior GOPpers are in on the plan of dismantling the U.S.

If the GOP not only doesn't care to save itself, is it true that it doesn't want to save the Constitution either?


http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Oldline_Republican_warns_somethings_in_works_0719.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rjones2818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
9. Contact your congress person!
Here's a link to do so:

http://www.visi.com/juan/congress/

It's a good way to keep pressure on them.
You can also try contacting the House Judiciary Committee:

http://judiciary.house.gov/contact.aspx

Go Dennis and Co-Sponsors!
http://dennis4president.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
10. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
11. I hope this thread gets at least 33 recs.... times 2 or 3.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
13. Thank you David!!
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
14. Wow! That's doubled since the last time I heard a count! Thanks! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. It's doubled because number combines HR 333 wich Gonzalez impeachment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
20. I was on the Hill yesterday pushing HRES 333
I was told by Jessica Elledge Executive Assistant/ Scheduler for Rep. Chris Murphy of CT that he is seriously considering backing HRes 333. I lobbied as many Democrats as I could and left a hand written note to my Rep. Rosa Delauro. It's getting real attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fed-up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
21. k/r nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
22. Just wrote to Nita Lowey in NY 18th. www.congress.gov.
Do it because it feels so good.

Ahhhhhhh.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
23. I thought Conyers was going to start impeachment when three members supported it
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. I think it was "three more" not "three" and I question the source of that staement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. His staffers couldn't even explain what he meant and iirc,
it's on tape. He did say it but no one has been able to explain what kind of math he was doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. His staffers couldn't explain what the meant?
Could it be that Father Time is catching up with Mr. Conyers? He will be 80 in less than two years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. I hope not!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
24. Call Your Congress Person
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
26. Just wrote to my Congressman ( Hinchey)
Dear Congressman Hinchey,

I have often written to you to express my deep gratitude for all you do for the people in our district and our country in these troubled times. This time I have to ask if you haven't accidentally forgotten to do something. Before you come home for the break ( and if you have left already when you get back), please remember to sign HR 333, the one calling for impeachment. That, incidentally, is why I put the topic as crime, although I was also thinking of terrorism.

I know it is just an oversight, in the same way that I keep forgetting to put up my IMPEACHMENT sign on my front lawn. How about this: you remember to sign on as a co-sponsor to Impeachment and I'll get my sign up by Monday. Actually, I'm sort of embarrassed. Everyone else in my neck of the woods already has their signs up.

Well, thanks again for all you do.

Tom G

Actually, I was pretty surprised he didn't sign already. He has been a vocal critic of this war from jump, and is one of the more progressive members of Congress. Think I'll do a follow-up call in an hour or so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejbr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
30. Nancy is being an idiot
...other than the Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, who said on Tuesday that if she were not the Speaker she would probably be backing impeachment.


Why can't she be both vocal about the NEED for impeachment, but reluctant to pursue it because other members of Congress are not on board???? What is so difficult about that? Oh, that's right, she has a bunch of legislation that the obstructionist republicans are going to block or president is going to veto. So, even though all of her wish list legislation will go no where, we should not "waste time" with an attempt to restore our constitution. Good call Nancy.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC