Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton Amendment Requires DHS to Give Bonuses to Contractors when Contract Stipulations Are Met

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 10:40 AM
Original message
Clinton Amendment Requires DHS to Give Bonuses to Contractors when Contract Stipulations Are Met

Note that I only posted this story. I didn't in any way write it.

http://www.loho10002.com/wordpress/?p=797

While Senator Hillary Clinton is supporting (albeit 5 years too late) US withdrawal from Iraq, she appears to be pushing the enhancement of the less overt US involvement there, the contractors. In her most recent press release, our senator is advocating paying them bonuses for a job well done. If you’ve been worried about a clandestine, private US army staying behind as contractors, you may have Hillary to thank for it. Read how she debates DHS not whether or not we should be paying private companies for jobs our own military can do better and cheaper (not to speak of local contractors) - she’s much more concerned with paying these combination death-squad / pirate gangs a good day’s pay for a good day’s job. Like Bill, Hillary is shaping up to be a great Liberal Republican.



Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton today announced that her amendment barring the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from giving award fees or bonuses to contactors for work they haven’t done was included in the Senate Homeland Security Appropriations bill, which passed the Senate late last night. Senator Clinton’s amendment requires DHS to give award fees, or bonuses, to contractors only if the contractor meets specific outlined stipulations in the contract. This bill will now move to be conferenced with the House and then to the President for signature.

snip Senator Clinton’s amendment requires DHS to give award fees or bonuses to contractors only if the contractor meets the stipulations related to cost, schedule, and performance outlined in the contract. If a contractor receives a poor performance evaluation, exceeds costs specified in the contract, or does not meet the deadlines specified in the contract, then the contractor will not receive an award fee or bonus from DHS.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Of course it's better to give bonuses when the contractor has fucked up big time
:sarcasm:

Isn't she saying the bonuses should NOT be given as a matter of fact but only if the job is done correct and on time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. silly-------they get bonues now even if work is shoddy. What is your beef?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fed-up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. the no bid contracts are bonuses in themselves-Hilary wants to throw away more taxpayer $$$$$ wtf nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. duh....... it seems no one on her staff
Edited on Sun Jul-29-07 11:02 AM by madrchsod
understands construction contracts..bonus and other incentives are awarded if the job comes under the contract amount or is done before the contracted completion date.

another example that she or her staff knowing nothing about how things are done in the real world of dirty jobs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
5. What's wrong with that....knowing the contractors the bushies hired
THEY WILL NEVER GET ANY,.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC