Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Flashback: January 4, 2004

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 05:18 PM
Original message
Flashback: January 4, 2004
"He is a good guy, but I truly believe he is a Republican," Howard Dean said of retired Army general and former NATO supreme commander Wesley Cark, January 2004

"I don't want a continuation of Bush-Cheney. I don't want Bush-Cheney lite". Barack Obama, referring to Hillary Clinton, July 2007

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't want Bush-Cheney lite either. Do you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. nope, but I don't want Nader-lite, either
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Are you saying the tactics are the same?
Edited on Thu Jul-26-07 05:26 PM by FrenchieCat
Cause I would see it differently.

In January of 2004, Clark had very little history with voters for them to judge him on.....and so, it was easy for what Howard Dean was stating to be thought to be true.......and although Clark was never a Republican, Clark himself had admitted to voting for Republicans Reagan and Nixon in past presidential elections. Add that to the fact that Clark was not a registered Democrat until shortly after throwing his hat into the ring, gave Dean's statement some basis for technical credence at the time.


Clinton has a strong record with Voters, and so whatever Obama says about the senator can be judged on by individual voters much more easily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. yep
Not discounting anything you've said, the tactic plays on the emotions of a very small part of the party who've set up standards and benchmarks for what constitutes a "real Democrat."

You realize, don't you, that Obama would not be allowed to make that insinuation on DU?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. Well in both cases those are fighting words
and voters can themselves decide how in bounds or out of bounds fighting words are in the context of a heated campaign. I know for certain that Howard Dean would not say anything like that now. When fighting words are spoken they usually either follow or preceed a fight, so I expect we will see/hear more hard wrestling between the Obama and Clinton camps.

While agreeing that any comparison to Bush-Cheney is fighting words, I think Obasma's clear inference here was that Clinton's approach to diplomacy with adversaries was Bush-Cheney light, not that Hillary Clinton herself is Bush-Cheney light.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC