Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Barbara Boxer on why she voted AGAINST the Iraqi Funding Bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
chknltl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 05:48 PM
Original message
Barbara Boxer on why she voted AGAINST the Iraqi Funding Bill
(I cut the ENTIRE form letter and pasted it here. I am a newbie with computers so if I am breaching internet or DU protocols by doing this...well go ahead and holler at me for it. Barbara Boxer's words are what is important here...she is a hero to me...she is still standing and fighting for WE THE PEOPLE and I support her for doing this.)


From: "Barbara Boxer" <[email protected]>
Subject: Why I voted "No"
Date: Fri, May 25, 2007 1:58 pm
To: Ryan D******

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Dear Ryan,

Yesterday, I voted "No" on the Iraq war funding bill. I want to
share with you the remarks I made on the Senate floor.

**************************
In March and in April I voted for emergency spending legislation
that would have fully funded our troops in Iraq, but also
changed their mission to a sound one. That mission would have
taken our troops out of the middle of a civil war, and put them
into a support role, training Iraqi soldiers and police,
fighting al Qaeda, and protecting our troops.

The President will not agree to that.

As a matter of fact, the President won't agree to any change in
strategy in Iraq, and that is more than a shame for the American
people; it is a tragedy.

It doesn't seem to matter how many Americans die in Iraq, how
many funerals we have here at home, or what the American people
think. The President won't budge.

This new bill on Iraq keeps the status quo. With a few frills
around the outside, a few reports, a few words about benchmarks.
While our troops die.

I understand why this particular legislation is before us today.
It's because this President wants to continue his one man show
in Iraq. The President doesn't respect this Congress or the
American people when it comes to Iraq. He wants to brush us all
off like some annoying spot on his jacket.

We have lost 3,427 American soldiers in Iraq. Of those, 731
(21%) have been from California or based in California. There
are 25,549 American soldiers wounded.

And today, after several days of worrying and praying, we
received the tragic news of the death of Private Joseph J.
Anzack JR., 20 years old, of Torrance, California, who was
abducted during a deadly ambush south of Baghdad almost two
weeks ago.

One member of his platoon, Spc. Daniel Seitz, summed it up this
way to the Associated Press: "It just angers me that it's just
another friend I've got to lose and deal with, because I've
already lost 13 friends since I've been here, and I don't know
if I can take any more of this."

And he shouldn't have to. But with this bill, he will.

The first half of this year has already been deadlier than any
six-month period since the war began more than four years ago.

In this month alone, 83 U.S. Service members have already been
killed in Iraq.

Let me be clear, there are many things in this bill that I
strongly support--many provisions that I actually fought for,
for our troops, for our veterans, for our farmers, and for the
victims of Hurricane Katrina--but I must take a stand against
this Iraq war, and therefore I will vote no on this emergency
spending bill.
**************************

Together, we will end this war. We may not have won yesterday's
vote, and I'm very disappointed that we didn't, but with your
help, that day is coming soon.

In Friendship,

Barbara Boxer
U.S. Senator

Visit BarbaraBoxer.com: http://ga6.org/ct/NdNmAgp17uU6/home

******************************************************
Paid for by Friends of Barbara Boxer.
Contributions to Friends of Barbara Boxer are
not tax-deductible for federal income tax purposes.
FEC #C00279315
******************************************************

--------------------------------------------------

Invite your friends and family to join Friends of Barbara Boxer
today!

http://ga6.org/join-forward.html?domain=boxer2010&r=z7NmAgp1WHMz

If you received this message from a friend, you can sign up for
Friends of Barbara Boxer at:

http://ga6.org/boxer2010/join.html?r=z7NmAgp1WHMzE

--------------------------------------------------


******************************
This email is Powered by Convio, Inc.

http://www.convio.com

******************************

Download this as a file

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Way to say it Senator!!
"I understand why this particular legislation is before us today.
It's because this President wants to continue his one man show
in Iraq. The President doesn't respect this Congress or the
American people when it comes to Iraq. He wants to brush us all
off like some annoying spot on his jacket."

:thumbsup: :thumbsup:

I think I will forward this to my representative who voted for the funding & will be running for senate in '08.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chknltl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-27-07 04:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. kicked
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hersheygirl Donating Member (353 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-27-07 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. She is one Great Lady.
I am writing to my senators and will include her comments. She has more "balls" so to speak, than they do. Perhaps what we have to do is just keep shaming them.:spank: :spank: :spank: :spank: :spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chknltl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-27-07 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yep she has balls and possibly more:
: INTEGRETY
Recently those Dems that I have come to love and respect have been mysteriously doing a 180 on their votes. Patty Murry, (D Wa.) for example. She has recently begun voting with the repugs on issues which favor Big Business yet I see no mention of these votes in her weekly newsletters I get from her. Recently she led the charge down in Olympia to squelch any legislation to impeach bush or cheney. Then she voted to support the Pharmaceutical industry over the folks who would purchase their prescription drugs at a much cheaper rate from companies outside our own borders.... I have not looked but I suspect she has her name on this same Bill Barbara Boxer refused to sign. I can easily imagine that $$ has changed her viewpoint and votes here but I have no proof of this of course. I am deeply saddened by her change of attitude here...she has fought so hard for us vets in my state and the farmers and our ports and etc. Now this.... She is but one of many Dems I am now concerned about. Should she run unopposed I'll hold my nose and vote for her again BUT should someone run against her I will actively support this person and point out Senator Murry's voting record to all I can reach!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-27-07 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. Way to go, Barbara!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 02:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC