Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

24 Organizations Ask Pelosi and Reid to Leave Iraq Its Oil

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
davidswanson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 10:10 PM
Original message
24 Organizations Ask Pelosi and Reid to Leave Iraq Its Oil

May 18, 2007
The Honorable Nancy Pelosi
The Honorable Harry Reid
United States Congress

Dear Speaker Pelosi and Senator Reid,

We recognize and applaud your escalating efforts to bring peace to Iraq and to bring our troops home. However, we are concerned about the proposed Iraqi hydrocarbon law and the benchmark in the Iraq supplemental urging the Iraqi government to pass this law as soon as possible.

Americans are counting on your efforts in Congress to end the war and bring the troops home in a way that rebuilds the credibility of our nation and reaffirms America's position as a force for freedom and democracy in the world. However, if Democrats are perceived to be advocating withdrawal only after access to Iraqi oil has been assured this will do little to reassure critics.

The proposed Iraqi Oil Law will open up Iraq to international oil companies for the first time in decades, and potentially rob the Iraqis of billions of dollars. We are therefore joining Hasan Jum'a Awad, Head of the Iraqi Federation of Oil Unions urging you "not to link withdrawal with the oil law".1

As you know, Iraq has at least 115 billion barrels of known oil reserves - 10 per cent of the world total. Oil accounts for more than 70 per cent of Iraq's GDP and 95 per cent of government revenue.

There is a strong opinion among Iraqis and many Americans that control of oil resources was a major motivation for the Bush administration in going to war. Passage of an oil law that could benefit international oil companies and arguably disadvantage the Iraqi people is therefore not in the long term interests of peace and stability in Iraq.

According to a recent statement by the combined leadership of Iraqi Unions:

"Iraqi public opinion strongly opposes the handing of authority and control over the oil to foreign companies, that aim to make big profits at the expense of the people. They aim to rob Iraq's national wealth by virtue of unfair, long term oil contracts that undermine the sovereignty of the State and the dignity of the Iraqi people."2

The oil law is a critical and delicate piece of Iraq's future. It deserves time to be fully debated, and for consensus to develop. As current oil industry consultant and former Reagan Administration appointee J. Robinson West said recently on NPRs Diane Rehm show:

"I think, frankly, it's a mistake that this be one of the benchmarks for the performance of the government. This is like saying for the United States - well why dont you solve states rights or slavery in six-week period?"3

In sum, our concerns about this law as currently drafted are as follows:

--The details on revenue sharing, which are a central and key component, have yet to be agreed.

--The law could effectively take the majority of Iraq's oil out of the exclusive hands of the Iraqi government and open it to international oil companies for a generation or more.4

--The law sets no minimum standard for the extent to which foreign companies would not have to invest their earnings in the Iraqi economy, partner with Iraqi companies, hire Iraqi workers or share new technologies.

--International oil companies could be offered some of the most corporate-friendly contracts in the world, including what are called production sharing agreements5. These agreements have been rejected by all the top oil producing countries in the Middle East because they grant long-term contracts (20 to 30 years in the case of Iraq's draft law) and greater control, ownership and profits to the companies than other models. In fact, they are used for only approximately 12 percent of the world's oil.6

Iraqis may very well choose to use the expertise and experience of international oil companies. They are most likely to do so in a manner that best serves their own needs if they are first freed from the tremendous external pressure being exercised by the Bush administration, the oil corporations and the presence of 150,000 members of the American military.

Please drop the Iraqi Oil Law Benchmark, and oppose the Bush administration's ongoing efforts to pressure the Al-Maliki government to pass the law in the near future.

20/20 Vision
Center for Corporate Policy
Global Exchange
Global Response
International Forum on Globalization
Iraq Veterans Against the War
Oil Change International
Organic Consumers Organization
Peace Action
Polaris Institute
Progressive Democrats of America
Public Citizen
Rainforest Action Network
True Majority
U.S. Labor Against the War
United for Peace and Justice
Voters for Peace

1 See the full text of Hasan Juma Awads Letter to Congress at:

2 Statement issued by the Iraqi Labor Union Leadership at a Seminar held from 10 to 14 December 2006, in Amman, Jordan available at:

3 Transcript of Diane Rehm show, April 26th, 2007, available at:

4 The Iraq National Oil Company would have exclusive control of just 27 of Iraq's 78 known oil fields, leaving two-thirds of the known and probable reserves open to foreign control under production sharing agreements.

5 Although in the latest draft of the law they have been renamed "Exploration and Production Contracts".

6 Muttitt, Greg, Crude Designs, November 2005, Iraq's neighbors Iran, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia maintain nationalized oil systems but all hire international oil companies as contractors to provide specific services as needed, for a limited duration, and without giving the foreign company any direct interest in the oil produced.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pingzing58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-17-07 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is why Bush keeps re-defining what success means in Iraq!
When the American Public (and we abide in a
"representative government," no House of Lords, no
House of Commons, no Generalissimo Commander in Chief with his
military junta as military dictator (I'm THE DECIDER)), the
Senate and the Congress, ask him to explain the reason for
remaining in Iraq all he can say is that we have a mission and
that mission keeps chaining (weapons of mass destruction,
Saddam as brutal dictator and must be eliminated, fight
Al-Qaeda there and not here, when they stand up then we will
stand down, when there is less violence, Iran and Syria have
sent operatives into the country and we must fight them to
give this emerging democracy and chance) then, I wonder if
there is another reason; a reason that so many in Europe
pointed out to us; oil.  Bush family oil and control by
Cheney's Halliburton; good for their pockets and good for the
country (sarcasm).  It's fact, you go to war and any general
can tell you; the loss of life by the troops means nothing
other than to achieve our end (moral or immoral) we estimate
the loss of 10,000 troops.  Fine, that's acceptable.  Let's do
it and we'll stay until we control the oil production of Iraq
thus maintaining control over OPEC - we'll pull our troops out
eventually, but we need to leave a military presence there
permanently.  That seems to be Bush's plan and Hillary's as
compromise (I don't agree with her).  Just wondering.  
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-18-07 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. K&R, thanks for keeping this story in the news. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-18-07 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. Great to see this posted. No one can say that they weren't aware.
How this is resolved is the key to Iraq's future. If it wasn't about the oil, this should be easily agreed to, right?

I hope this gets mainstream amplification...I'd love to see KO report on this....the whole Net should amplify this letter by posting it over the next week or so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dystopian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-18-07 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
4. k&r.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-18-07 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. Why don't more people talk about this?
It's the great big elephant in the room. Kudos to all those organizations for putting the pressure on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-18-07 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. Thank you for your work, David. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-18-07 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. DS is JUST. SO. REAL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
freedomfries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-18-07 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. thanks so much for posting this David!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cosmicdot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-18-07 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. posting to kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Jul 26th 2017, 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC