Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

REPORT: Karl Rove’s Politicization Of The Federal Government

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 02:17 PM
Original message
REPORT: Karl Rove’s Politicization Of The Federal Government
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/05/rove-politicization-government/


REPORT: Karl Rove’s Politicization Of The Federal Government

In March, the Washington Post revealed that General Services Administration chief Lurita Doan and Karl Rove deputy Scott Jennings held a videoconference earlier this year to devise “ways to help Republican candidates.” ThinkProgress has produced a report that documents the fact that GSA is only one of many federal agencies that the Bush White House has infiltrated for partisan purposes.

READ THE REPORT HERE:
http://thinkprogress.org/rove-empire/

Politicization of the federal government has been illegal for decades. The 1939 Hatch Act specifically prohibits partisan campaign or electoral activities on federal government property, including federal agencies. But in 2005, Ken Mehlman, formerly one of Bush’s top political advisers, outlined the White House’s strategy of utilizing government resources for partisan gain:

One of the things that can happen in Washington when you work in an agency is that you forget who sent you there. And it’s important to remind people that you’re George Bush people. … If there’s one empire I want built, it’s the George Bush empire.

With that imperial partisanship in mind, the Bush White House has engaged in an unprecedented quest to politicize the federal government, giving briefings and PowerPoint presentations everywhere from the Interior Department to NASA on how to secure Republican victories. Said one Interior Department manager, “We were constantly being reminded about how our decisions could affect electoral results” (One Party Country, p. 103). Bush loyalists in federal agencies have also helped generate millions for favored political candidates.

ThinkProgress’ report highlights the pervasiveness of the White House’s politicization efforts since 2001. Check out the report. Let us know if there’s something we missed in the comments section, or contact us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. So Karl is in violation of the Hatch Act here?
I really want Congress to take off the kid gloves and start investigating this guy to find out exactly how many laws he has broken and if they come down to treason. He's got to go to prison down the line IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Karl's very presence at the White House is a violation of the Hatch Act
if you ask me. The Dems should have NEVER allowed that to happen. But there was nary a peep from any of them at the time. A whole hella bunch of problems, not all of them political (Katrina springs immediately to mind), could've been avoided had Mr. Rove been given his Hatch Act walking papers when he first needed them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I guess we'd better start goosing our Democratic elected
representatives to move investigations of Karl Rove to the top of their calendar. Ensnaring him would solve a lot of peripheral problems in the White House. I would like to see Condaleeza Rice called on the carpet too and not nicely. I was listening to a major general on the Ring of Fire radio program today who had recently returned from Iraq. He basically said she wasn't doing her job. There was only so much the military could do and there was a real need for diplomacy to solve the many problems we created in Iraq, but she seemed to have no plan nor care much about trying diplomacy there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ah, Mehlman. Can we indict him, too? Please?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyLib2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. Do we have some DU political scientists who can comment?


I don't have the expertise, but have to think that this corruption will go down in U.S. history, something like Teapot Dome and Nixon's resignation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. More like Boss Tweed
but then, he was a Democrat. It's all about ideology rather than party affiliation. Crooks always gravitate to the party in power because that's where the money is, as one famous bank robber was fond of saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. ’ve got is everything—and I mean everything—being run by the political arm. It’s the reign of the Ma
John DiIulio, former head of White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives:
“There is no precedent in any modern White House for what is going on in this one: a complete lack of a policy apparatus,” says DiIulio. “What you’ve got is everything—and I mean everything—being run by the political arm. It’s the reign of the Mayberry Machiavellis.”

source: Ron Suskind, Esquire , January 2003. “Why Are These Men Laughing?”
http://www.ronsuskind.com/ newsite/ articles/ archives/ 000032.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC