Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

About the FCC - they work for Congress, not the Executive Branch

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 12:14 PM
Original message
About the FCC - they work for Congress, not the Executive Branch
From their web site:

http://www.fcc.gov/aboutus.html

About the FCC

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is an independent United States government agency, directly responsible to Congress. The FCC was established by the Communications Act of 1934 and is charged with regulating interstate and international communications by radio, television, wire, satellite and cable. The FCC's jurisdiction covers the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and U.S. possessions.


Where are any of our reps on this one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Uben Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good! Let's politicize it!
Let's use a page outta Rove's playbook and demand the FCC shut down all RW radio and tv shows!

They wanna play politics? Let's roll, baby!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Just a minute here....
>>The FCC is directed by five Commissioners appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate for 5-year terms, except when filling an unexpired term. The President designates one of the Commissioners to serve as Chairperson. Only three Commissioners may be members of the same political party. None of them can have a financial interest in any Commission-related business.<<

The pres still hires and fires. The congress just supplies the funds. Sorry, but the executive is still the "boss." The Congress is just the payroll dept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. That's how Michael Powell (fat son of Colin, FWIW) managed to get the job
He was a real "non-political" chairman....NOT.

TIRING OF "WARDROBE MALFUNCTIONS". As FCC chairman, Powell received praise from most businesses for his approach. He often took strong positions on issues favorable to Bell telephone companies, such as overturning rules surrounding wholesale competition on the outfits' networks. He also ruled recently that newfangled voice-over-IP offerings were not a conventional phone service -- to the benefit of the cable industry.

It's the pro-business Powell that drove consumer groups batty. They repeatedly criticized him for attempting to allow media conglomerates to grow bigger. But the soon-to-be-ex commissioner failed to relax ownership restrictions, infuriating many in industry. Powell expressed some regret that he was unable to finish new media-ownership rules -- an appeals court has held up his liberalization attempt.

Ultimately, what appeared to wear down Powell might have been the very sort of issue for which he'll be most remembered. Sanford C. Bernstein analyst Tom Wolzien observes that Powell talked of how he hated having to deal with "wardrobe malfunctions," a reference to the exposed breast of Janet Jackson during last year's Super Bowl game.

But many took note when Powell spoke harshly of media's failed decorum during the incident. Under his leadership, the FCC swiftly cracked down on indecent antics on TV and radio by levying a record $550,000 fine on CBS stations that carried the game.

http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/jan2005/nf20050121_1183_db016.htm

And his "non political" replacement????

FCC Chair Schemes to Undermine Net Neutrality

http://www.thenation.com/blogs/thebeat?pid=145574

The Federal Communications Commission is supposed to be made up of five independent members...But FCC chair Kevin Martin, a Bush White House retainer who reportedly entertains notions of running for the governorship of his native North Carolina with a campaign war chest full of telecommunications-industry contributions, is now attacking the basic structures of the FCC in order to deliver for the corporations he hopes will someday be his political benefactors.

Martin has ordered the commission's lawyers to come up with a scheme that would force another Republican commissioner, Robert McDowell, to "unrecuse" himself from a voting on a massive merger between telecommunications giants AT&T and BellSouth.

Prior to joining the commission in June, McDowell represented a telecommunications corporation, CompTel, that has engaged in lobbying with regard to the merger. As such, McDowell has a classic conflict of interest. He acted appropriately when he recused himself....Martin, who still hopes to secure FCC approval of the merger this year, is now trying to get McDowell to act inappropriately -- and, presumably, in a manner that will please Martin's corporate masters.

Martin's move has already drawn rebukes from members of Congress who follow telecommunications issues. "I believe that forcing a Commissioner to participate in a proceeding in which he or she would otherwise be recused is an extraordinary notion for an independent, impartial regulatory agency," said Representative Ed Markey, D-Massachusetts, a key player on the House Energy and Commerce Committee who is seeking the chairmanship of the Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet. "Agency Commissioners must exercise independent, impartial, and unbiased judgment in matters before the Commission."

Pennsylvania Democrat Mike Doyle, another well-regarded member of the Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet, wrote to Martin that, "While I take no position on the merger proceeding itself, I feel very strongly that this request to unrecuse Commissioner McDowell would set the Commission on a treacherous course toward an unacceptable precedent.".........

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Correction: The President hires, but he does not fire
Their terms are for a fixed period of time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC