Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

On Fox, Hannity, North, and Hasselbeck claimed Pelosi may go to Iran, despite her denial

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 07:36 PM
Original message
On Fox, Hannity, North, and Hasselbeck claimed Pelosi may go to Iran, despite her denial
This is pathetic...

http://mediamatters.org/items/200704130015?src=other

On Fox, Hannity, North, and Hasselbeck claimed Pelosi may go to Iran, despite her denial

On the April 12 edition of Fox News' Hannity & Colmes, co-host Sean Hannity, Fox News military analyst Oliver North, and ABC's The View co-host Elisabeth Hasselbeck all repeated the false claim that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) would consider a diplomatic trip to Iran, even though the Associated Press had reported her spokesman's statement the previous day that Pelosi has "no intention of going to Iran." The claims continued despite co-host Alan Colmes' noting that Pelosi "never said she was going to Iran." Later, Colmes noted, "er spokesperson says she has no intention of going to Iran."

During an April 10 press conference, shortly after returning from a trip to Syria, Pelosi and House Foreign Affairs Committee chairman Tom Lantos (D-CA) were asked by reporters if they were interested in extending their diplomacy to Iran. Lantos replied, "Speaking just for myself, I would be ready to get on a plane tomorrow morning." He added: "Speaking for myself, I'm ready to go -- and knowing the speaker, I think that she might be." Although Pelosi did not respond to the question or to Lantos' statement, the San Francisco Chronicle published an article headlined, "Pelosi, Lantos may be interested in diplomatic trip to Iran." Conservative Internet gossip Matt Drudge linked to the article on his website, the Drudge Report, with the headline "Pelosi may go to Iran ..."

However, throughout Hannity & Colmes, Hannity, North, and Hasselbeck repeated the claim that Pelosi may be interested in traveling to Iran without noting the statement by Pelosi's spokesman. In the first segment, Hasselbeck said, "You know, people now are saying, should Nancy Pelosi be -- you know, should she have gone over to Syria? Should she have been in Iran? Will she go to Iran?" Colmes responded by saying, "She never said she was going to Iran," to which Hasselbeck replied, "No, she didn't say she was going to Iran, but the potential is there. We all know that." Later, Hannity told viewers that "the embattled San Francisco speaker hints at an impending visit to the rogue nation of Iran," and North said that Pelosi is "now willing to at least consider going to Iran."

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. See, men do know best. Women never know what they're going to do.
Men have to tell them.

(Snark!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Trash (Faux) network has to keep its lunatic base worked up. You think Fox is any better than
the National Inquiry? Has alot of nut jobs watching it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gato Moteado Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. i'm glad to see fox has credible and knowledgeable experts like....
elisabeth hasslebeck and ollie north to talk to their credible, knowledgeable hosts like sean hannity.

fox is a joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is what they did to the Clintons for 12 years
And some of it stuck--as evidenced by the dislike of her on this board. As long as the neo-cons are in charge of the propaganda, we will have to constantly fight these lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. How did some idiot from survivor become a pundit?
I'm really curious how that transformation took place. I understand that North got his credentials by dealing drugs and arms and violating laws on a regular basis, and if anyone would know about underhanded deals with Iranians, certainly he would. And Hannity has been pundocritized for ages, but Hasselbeck? I don't get it.

Oh yes I forgot what's his name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. here`s how she rose to the level of pundit-hood
"Previously Ms. Hasselbeck exhibited her flair for fashion as host of the Style Network's "The Look for Less," where she helped viewers find designer styles at bargain prices."

being a good dad i`m proud to say that i watched this program with my daughter and ms hasselbeck was on camera for about 5 minutes out of a half hour.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I guess..
anyone's who's popular and regurgitates the RW talking points of the day can be a pundit on FAUX. But she's not smart enough to hold her own with the lies/propaganda when challenged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC