Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Katrina vanden Heuvel: The Media's Ideological View of Pelosi's Trip

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-09-07 08:44 AM
Original message
Katrina vanden Heuvel: The Media's Ideological View of Pelosi's Trip
from The Nation:


BLOG | Posted 04/08/2007 @ 9:22pm
The Media's Ideological View of Pelosi's Trip


As Glenn Greenwald rightly points out in a recent post from his Unclaimed Territory blog, media coverage of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's recent trip to Syria can fairly be labeled "hysteria-driven."

Taking its cues from those who should be totally discredited, and set out to pasture for misleading us into this disastrous war, major media outlets like Meet the Press, (April 8) CNN and The Washington Post ("Pratfall in Damascus," April 5) have lambasted Pelosi for her "irresponsible" trip and for her "incompetence"--instead of suggesting that maybe we have a sane political leader who, at long last, understands that we need to maintain dialogue even with those we see as our enemies or "foes."

It's to be expected that the rightwing Noise Machine would snap into action--its chieftains Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh baying, scraping and bowing to give a platform to the discredited Vice-President--who had the staggering chutzpah to chide Pelosi for her "bad behavior" in making the trip. (Don't ignore the sexism in that remark--or in much of the media coverage.) Those who would listen to a man who condoned torture accusing Speaker Pelosi of bad behavior are disgraceful mouthpieces for the Bush Administration's vilification campaigns.

But what's perhaps more discouraging and dangerous is to witness what we mistakenly call the mainstream media working overtime to discredit Pelosi--depicting her as a failure, something of a joke, and out of touch with the proverbial "mainstream" which this media wrongly claims to speak for.

Where were the clear reports that Pelosi was simply following up on the Iraq Study Group report's recommendations that the US open a diplomatic initiative towards Syria? The Bushies have refused to heed the report. Instead the Administration continues, destructively, with its foreign policy of name-calling, bellligerence and scorn for diplomacy. The Speaker--along with her bipartisan group--is to be commended for exploring alternatives to this Administration's disastrous approach to US policy in the Middle East.

What's staggering, as Greenwald in this post--The Nation week to week, and other sane media watchdogs keep telling us--is just how out of touch and trivial our mainstream media is when it comes to reporting on the substantive scandals and abuses of our time.

http://www.thenation.com/blogs/edcut?bid=7&pid=183655


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-09-07 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. Lil Boots shit-canned the ISG report so fast
Bush tossed the ISG report into the trash so fast it nearly burst into flames from the atmospheric friction. But when it first came out, all these "responsible" "mainstream" media outlets were falling all over each other, hailing the opportunity for Bush to extricate himself from his mess using the Iraq Study Group as an exit. As soon as they descried the writing on the wall, that Bush wasn't going to follow any of the report's recommendations, it became "Report? What report?" Hey, we're surging, baby!

So Nancy Pelosi actually tries one or two recommendations, does it in a way that doesn't undermine Little Boots' public position, and gets results, and the "responsible" "mainstream" media goes the way of an Alzheimer's patient, ranting and raving about "bad behavior." This is just nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsLeopard Donating Member (717 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-09-07 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. Proud to be the first to K&R
Katrina rocks! If only her message were heard by the masses rather than the few. Though I do have to admit, more of the masses seem to be catching on.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-09-07 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. Recommended
for Katrina.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-09-07 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. K&R. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-09-07 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. I guarantee Cheney's visit to Saudi Arabia was far more sinister.
Not that Ms. Pelosi's trip had anything but the most gracious intentions.

We're fighting a beast. The monster of money. Nancy Pelosi is but a tiny figure in comparison to the invisible mighty power of what we are up against.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-09-07 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. I prefer mass corporate media versus mainstream media,
unless you think of the mainstream as the river in Ohio which caught fire a few years back.


Katrina Vanden Heuvel rocks and should be on the Sunday morning pundit shows more often.

Thanks for the thread marmar

Kicked and recommended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC