Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chuck Hagel: A Man for All Seasons

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 05:50 PM
Original message
Chuck Hagel: A Man for All Seasons
http://blogs.southflorida.com/citylink_dansweeney/2007/04/chuck_hagel_a_man_for_all_seas.html


Despite the title of this blog entry, a veiled reference to the senator from Nebraska's flip-flop on the war, I welcomed him to the anti-war side of the debate. I was glad to see a such a strongly conservative voice see the error of his ways and realize that this war in Iraq represents the worst imperialist arrogance, which is hardly a traditional conservative value.

But one thing I will not tolerate from these anti-war-come-latelys is illustrated by one of Hagel's quotes in his recent interview in Esquire magazine:
"Congress abdicated its oversight responsibility," he says. "The press abdicated its responsibility, and the American people abdicated their responsibilities. Terror was on the minds of everyone, and nobody questioned anything, quite frankly."

Screw that noise, senator. The president and his abettors in Congress (meaning you), along with a healthy portion of the American populace, dragged me kicking, screaming, punching, biting, and thrashing into this war. So don't dare try to lay even a shred of the blame for this crap at my feet. I recall watching Colin Powell's horseshit speech before the U.N., in which he tried to pass off cartoons and grainy photos as proof positive that the Iraqis had chemical and biological weapons. I remember thinking, once the speech ended, "Well, that oughtta sink this stupidity." And yet, when Wolf Blitzer came on, he was falling all over himself to commend the open-and-shut case Powell had just laid out. It was as though we had seen two separate speeches.

No doubt, Senator Hagel, you saw the Blitzer version.

Later in the interview, Hagel goes on to say:

"There were two reasons I (voted for the Iraq War Resolution). I believed what the administration said, that war would be a last resort, and the second thing is, at a critical time like this, the president needs a strong hand, and to some extent, you've got to trust him, until he lies or screws up or something."

Well, if that's the case senator, then you were both foolish and naive. I agree that you should have some level of trust in your leaders until they "lie or screw up or something." But by the time of the resolution, Bush had already done that many times over. And did you honestly believe that a vote for the Iraq War Resolution would not be used by Bush to go to war? Don't patronize me. For someone as blunt as yourself, it's even less becoming that it is the typical silver-tongued snakes of Washington.

Senator Hagel's uttering of the word "impeachment" is the part of the Esquire article that was spread far and wide after it hit the stands. But, while I welcome Hagel's joining those of us who have always employed reason and critical thinking to our opinions of the Iraq War, I will not let him drag me, and everyone else who saw through the lies and manipulations of the Bush administration's casus belli, through the mud in a vainglorious attempt at revisionist history.

We have always been here, senator. From the moment the first drum beats of war began. Welcome. Pull up a chair. But don't believe for a second that you were the first one to the party.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
indie_voter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Darn tootin'! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. The kicker--he didn't "flip-flop" on the war. He knew it was a
bad idea from the git-go and said as much when he cast his vote. It's one thing to be duped, but he knew it was wrong and voted for it anyway--how does he square that with his conscience? As one of his constituents, I find it a little disturbing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Granted. I was just referring to his stance on the war...
not whatever may have gone through his conscience in the run up to his vote. But you're right, it is pretty disconcerting — and the point you raise is also brought up by Hagel's own brother in the Esquire interview. Definitely worth a read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. Chuck pissed me off with that one.I wrote this letter to both him and Esquire.
Dear Mr Hagel,

Today I read your interview in Esquire and was disgusted by your comment,"...and the American people abdicated their responsibilities. Terror was on the minds of everyone, and nobody questioned anything, quite frankly."

No,Mr Senator,the American people didn't abdicate our responsibility.Millions tried to stop this fiasco that we saw coming in Iraq.We marched,we wrote letters,we called you and your colleagues.What we got in return were labels of,"terrorist supporters","unpatriotic" and "traitors".

With all due respect Mr. Senator,the one who abdicated their responsibility was YOU,sir.You and all the others who didn't have the guts to speak.You and all the others who passed the Patriot Act without even reading it.You and all the others who took six years and thousands of lives to wake up.

Your comments are sad,and a poor way to cover your inability to show any courage when it mattered.

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC