Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Boehner says Rove should not testify.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 03:30 PM
Original message
Boehner says Rove should not testify.
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/15/boehner-rove/

Boehner says Rove should not testify.

The conservative establishment is circling the wagons around Karl Rove. From a press conference today with House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH):

QUESTION: Should the White House allow Karl Rove (inaudible) to testify?

BOEHNER: No, I think you’re violating a precedent there that should not be violated. U.S. attorneys serve at the pleasure of the president. The question here is what did happen and why were these seven asked to step down? Now, let’s get the facts and then we can make a judgment.

QUESTION: Does it prove (inaudible)

BOEHNER: They may, but I believe that under the separation of powers, there are limits to the extent to which Congress can subpoena or demand testimony from those who were closest to the president.

Earlier, Senate Judiciary Committee conservatives delayed a vote to subpoena Rove and Miers until next week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Boy, I don't think Repubs believed that very much in the '90's when they were
claiming executive privilege didn't extend to aides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. All depends on
who's ox is being gored. But, of course we Thank the esteemed Congressman for his opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. "separation of powers"
Why didn't his tongue turn to razor blades of fire in his throat when he said those words?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. US attorneys serve at the pleasure of the president. Rove ain't a USA.
Edited on Thu Mar-15-07 03:45 PM by Atman
We want to know why the "pleasure of the president" was being dictated by Karl Rove based upon POLITICS.

Put him on the fucking stand, let him sweat it out.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Serving THE pleasure of the President isn't part of the gig.
Yes, indeed. Let the treasonous, rat bastard dig himself in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brazos121200 Donating Member (626 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh come on, let's violate that precedent just this once,
OK John? You repubs were all for violating it during Clinton's term, weren't you, so come on, let's hear Karl do some fancy talking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. I...I....I'm a fucking idiot...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youngdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. Hey, good for him... I wondered what happened to him after Growing Pains
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. he has no say in the matter
and I am not talking about boner's complete non sequitor quoted above. The committee chair and the majority on the committee can subpoena anyone they want and then the courts can decide if Rove has some sort of immunity. Boner doesn't factor into it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
9. Boehner, why don't you just go into your office, close and lock the door,
Edited on Thu Mar-15-07 03:49 PM by AndyA
light up about 3 or 4 of your smokes so you can smoke them simultaneously, and then masturbate while you read the latest report on troop deaths in Iraq?

We know that's what you do best.

Otherwise, shut the fuck up because you and your party are a disgrace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. The post above this one is more accurate but this one is more fun
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbie Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yeah, Rove shouldn't testify....
Because he would have to freakin lie! :eyes: That Democrats continue to put the administration in this position is just annoying, isn't it Boner? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
13. Boehners Pleasure
"U.S. attorneys serve at the pleasure of the president. "



GAWD...........I am so sick and tired of their talking points

One lemming says a phrase, and the next thing you know, they are all repeating it over and over
again.......................

Pleasure THIS Boehner................:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
14. How are you going to get the facts if no one testifies?
Is this another example of the famous Republican gut instinct that enables them to judge the guilty and the innocent by just looking at them? Clinton was guilty because he was as cagey as the trial attorneys the Repressive Right sent after him. Libby was innocent because all the Republicans know he would just never, ever lie. Terri Schiavo was practically a fully-functioning adult, based on several seconds of heavily edited videotapes. Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction because you saw them use that phrase on Babylon 5.

Don't trust your gut instinct, Mr. Boehner; it's not exactly your party's strong suit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
15. Boner should not use his brain. It has been fried by all the sun tanning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC