Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Capital Turns Cold for Bush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 07:56 AM
Original message
Capital Turns Cold for Bush
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0307/3155.html

Capital Turns Cold for Bush

By: Jonathan Martin and Mike Allen
March 15, 2007 08:39 AM EST


The subject line of the e-mail says, "A widening scandal," like a tabloid tease. It's from Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (personally, according to the "From" line), urging supporters to endorse an online petition calling for Attorney General Alberto Gonzales to resign.

At the same time that plea hit inboxes Wednesday morning, Republicans and Democrats alike were feasting on 144 pages of internal administration e-mail, as juicy as the contents of a divorce file. Sent to Capitol Hill and immediately posted on the Web by Democrats, the memos show that the reshuffling of the U.S. attorney roster was carried out in a baldly political fashion, complete with talk of "woodshedding" the recalcitrant and "following through once the pressure comes."

It's a fiasco that could not have happened four months ago. The furor over the replacement of eight federal prosecutors reveals how radically the Republican wipeout in November, coupled with a looming presidential election, have transformed Washington politics.

Three new dynamics have given the scandal its punch and foreshadow a brutal political season: Democratic presidential candidates eager to confront the administration; congressional Democrats whose requests are now demands; and GOP presidential hopefuls reluctant to associate with -- much less defend -- a wounded president.

Republicans are fretting, and Democrats are fantasizing, about what the debacle foretells for the next year and half.

"We've only had subpoena power for the last six weeks and every tree that we've barked up so far has had a cat in it," said a senior Democrat who spoke on condition of anonymity because he is not authorized to speak publicly. "Imagine where we'll be after six months."

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
terip64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. kick and recommend!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. Politico.com obviously has no editors...
It is "Capitol," idiots, not Capital... I thought politico was the brainchild of wapo hotshots....:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. I think they're right; Capitol refers to the building. From dictionary.com:
That caught my eye, too.

—Usage note The noun capital refers to a city or town that is the seat of government; to a capital letter as opposed to a lowercase letter; and to wealth or resources. The noun Capitol refers primarily to the building in Washington, D.C., in which Congress sits or to similar buildings used by state legislatures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. No.. they are saying the (Place) Capitol has turned cold
Edited on Thu Mar-15-07 09:43 AM by hlthe2b
He may have no capital (referring to money, cache', clout), but the Capitol (Washington, DC =place) has turned cold
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Except they use "Capitol" in the article, indicating to me they
know the difference. Whatever...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. no.. just means they didn't edit...
Edited on Fri Mar-16-07 08:08 AM by hlthe2b
Their usage was clearly wrong-- as it appears in a formally posted article. These are big wig former WAPO "journalists" who are supposedly creating the "end-all" in political blogs-- not merely posting informal comments on another's blog, or in a live forum. As such, I DO expect them to be able to proof their own material at the level of a high school student. :shrug:


I don't quite understand why you draw a conclusion they may know the difference, since at one point in the article they use the correct form in a quite different context. Whether they know the difference or not is sort of immaterial, don't you think?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Ain't English wonderful?!
and imagine, we could be taling about ISSUES instead of being school marms...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. So, you don't find it a bit galling that these hotshot WAPO
stenographers, er, eh, "journalists" can't even write an article using correct grammar, nor hire an editor to do so? This wasn't an informal posting...

And, yes, I talk about substative issues all day long, as I"m sure do YOU. However, I'd also like to think that our educational system and our systems of written media are not going the way of GW BUsh*

So, take your snide comments elsewhere, TankLV. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. True, but maybe his (capital) donors have turned cold also.
Isn't he still pandering for $$$$ for his presidential liberry?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. He has no capital (i.e., cache, clout, $$), but the Capitol (DC)
Edited on Thu Mar-15-07 09:55 AM by hlthe2b
has turned cold. And, yes, I certainly do hope he has lost all his "capital" i.e., donors as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMarple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. Political capital?
As in he's used it all up. :shrug:

An editor may have placed the title, but a direct reference isn't in the article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Except for "political capital" .... runs cold?
doesn't make sense even assuming the loosest "slang" usage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. Every tree has had a cat in it
I don't quite know what to make about the characterization that Democrats are "fantasizing" about bringing a little accountability back to the government. And why in the world is all of this coming out only when Democrats finally took back the majority in Congress? Where have Jonathan Martin and Mike Allen been for the last five years that all of this corruption slipped under their journalistic noses? Or is it now popular and kewl for the kidz to actually, you know, report on what's going on around them?

Thanks for your stawart defense of the country, O snoozing sentries of the body politic in the Fourth Estate; the grown-ups will take it from here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. The rest of the article is pretty snarky; you can tell what viewpoint
politico.com writes from, especially Mike Allen. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
4. "Every tree has had a cat in it."
:rofl:

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demnan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. It's not enough
they should be investigating for impeaching these bastards, as far as I'm concerned, they've fallen down on the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
10. Why would employees at the White House have email different then dept email?
Email

Are they trying to make it more difficult for law enforcement or Congress to obtain them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. This gets into the discussion about using non government email service
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
17. Yes i "Imagine" what will happen after six months!
IMAGINE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC