Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Afghans: U.S. troops shot at civilians

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 11:59 AM
Original message
Afghans: U.S. troops shot at civilians
gowdssssssss--i feel so bad for these troops--they find themselves in the midst of a civil war just like in Iraq!



http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070304/ap_on_re_as/afghan_violence

Afghans: U.S. troops shot at civilians

By RAHIM FAIEZ, Associated Press Writer 32 minutes ago

JALALABAD, Afghanistan - U.S. Marines fleeing a militant ambush Sunday opened fire on civilian cars and pedestrians on a busy highway in eastern
Afghanistan, wounded Afghans said. Up to 16 people were killed and 34 wounded in the violence, officials said.
ADVERTISEMENT

A suicide attacker detonated an explosives-filled minivan as the American convoy approached, then militant gunmen fired on the troops inside the vehicles, who returned fire, the U.S. military said.

As the Americans sped away, they treated every car and person along the highway as a potential attacker, said Mohammad Khan Katawazi, the district chief of Shinwar. But Maj. William Mitchell, a U.S. military spokesman, said those killed and injured may have been shot by the militants.

More than a half dozen Afghans recuperating from bullet wounds told The Associated Press that the U.S. forces fired indiscriminately along at least a six-mile stretch of one of eastern Afghanistan's busiest highways — a route often filled not only with cars and trucks but Afghans on foot and bicycles.

"They were firing everywhere, and they even opened fire on 14 to 15 vehicles passing on the highway," said Tur Gul, 38, who was standing on the roadside by a gas station and was shot twice in his right hand. "They opened fire on everybody, the ones inside the vehicles and the ones on foot."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bullshit. There is no defense for this behavior...
<snip>

"They were firing everywhere, and they even opened fire on 14 to 15 vehicles passing on the highway," said Tur Gul, 38, who was standing on the roadside by a gas station and was shot twice in his right hand. "They opened fire on everybody, the ones inside the vehicles and the ones on foot."

<snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. The rules of engagement are to open fire in every direction after an IED explosion
We have seen US troops do this time and time again in Iraq as well in Afghanistan. Clearly, this is not an aberration, or a loss of command and control. These are not troops going wild. What it is, these are troops following orders, and their orders are to open fire in every direction after an IED explosion.

Remember that the torture of prisoners was also done under orders from the highest levels of the Bush regime, but only the lower ranks were punished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Were the 'militant gunmen' in uniforms or clearly
distinguishable from civilians?

If not, you can't expect the US soldiers' behavior to change.

It makes clear why the Geneva Conventions say what they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC