Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Strategic Implications of AFRICOM

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 06:07 PM
Original message
Strategic Implications of AFRICOM

Strategic Implications of AFRICOM



By James J.F. Forest



On February 6, 2007, President Bush announced the creation of a new unified military command center for Africa, and instructed his new Defense Secretary Robert Gates to get the new command up and running by the end of September 2008. United States Africa Command, to be known as AFRICOM, will work initially from existing facilities in Stuttgart, Germany, but eventually will be headquartered on the African continent. According to Secretary Gates, “This command will enable us to have a more effective and integrated approach than the current arrangement . . . an outdated arrangement left over from the Cold War,” and he noted that AFRICOM would “oversee security, co-operation, building partnership capability, defense support to non-military missions, and, if directed, military operations.”



Clearly, no single nation on the African continent poses a significant military threat to the United States or our allies. Thus, establishing a new unified military command may seem to be an unimportant policy or bureaucratic move to many observers, but in truth the creation of AFRICOM is quite important and makes excellent sense on several levels. Indeed, experts both within and outside the government, including General James Jones, the recently retired Commander of U.S. European Command, have been advocating the creation of an Africa Command since the mid-1990s. Combatant commanders—four-star generals with supporting staffs of up to 1,000 personnel—wield considerable influence in Washington, DC policymaking and strategic agenda development. Overall, the establishment of AFRICOM heralds a new recognition of the African continents’ growing strategic significance to the United States.

http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/global.php?id=751127

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, but we DO have an "Africa Policy." We shelled Somalia a few weeks ago, and
few noticed and even fewer cared.

And how many died? And for what? Nobody knows.

And it doesn't matter, does it, because they were just Africans who got in the way of some shells from one of our warships.

Kill some brown people and go on to the next thing, THAT's our Africa Policy.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC