Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Romney retreats on gun control (Boston Globe)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 06:23 AM
Original message
Romney retreats on gun control (Boston Globe)
Romney retreats on gun control
Ex-governor woos Republican votes

By Scott Helman, Globe Staff | January 14, 2007

ORLANDO , Fla. -- Former governor Mitt Romney, who once described himself
as a supporter of strong gun laws, is distancing himself from that rhetoric
now as he attempts to court the gun owners who make up a significant force
in Republican primary politics.

In his 1994 US Senate run, Romney backed two gun-control measures strongly
opposed by the National Rifle Association and other gun-rights groups: the
Brady Bill, which imposed a five-day waiting period on gun sales, and a ban
on certain assault weapons.

"That's not going to make me the hero of the NRA," Romney told the Boston
Herald in 1994.

-snip-

He now touts his work as governor to ease restrictions on gun owners. He proudly
describes himself as a member of the NRA -- though his campaign won't say when
he joined. And Friday, at his campaign's request, top officials of the NRA and the
National Shooting Sports Foundation led him around one of the country's biggest
gun shows.

-snip-

Full article: http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2007/01/14/romney_retreats_on_gun_control
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. Dem candidates should aggressively campaign supporting our party platform that says
"We will protect Americans' Second Amendment right to own firearms, and we will keep guns out of the hands of criminals and terrorists by fighting gun crime, reauthorizing the assault weapons ban, and closing the gun show loophole, as President Bush proposed and failed to do."

See http://www.democrats.org/pdfs/2004platform.pdf

Romney realizes he needs votes of law-abiding citizens who wish to exercise their natural, inherent and inalienable right to keep and bear arms for self defense.

Gore would have been president if he had pledged to protect Americans' Second Amendment right to own firearms.

Both Gore and Clinton said Gore's image as a gun-grabber cost him the election and almost certainly cost him his home state of Tennessee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. Flip
Flop
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
-..__... Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. Too late, Mitt...
your goose is already cooked... well done.


Firearm Reform Bill Signed

Romney Takes Opportunity to Betray Gun Owners

On July 1, 2004 , Governor Mitt Romney signed into law one of the greatest of reforms to Massachusetts gun laws in recent history. In what should have been a day of celebration for GOAL and its members, the Romney administration took a major shot at lawful gun owners and showed their true colors.

GOAL Director of Legislative Affairs Jim Wallace was invited to attend a ceremonial bill signing at 10:30 AM Thursday in the state house press room. Several of the reform bill�s supporters and the entire state house press corps were at the gathering.

In a move that shocked many in the room, Lieutenant Governor Kerry Healey began the ceremony by hailing this bill as ��an important victory against crime.� The Lieutenant Governor went on to say, �The most important job of state government is ensuring public safety. Governor Romney and I are determined to do whatever it takes to stop the flood of dangerous weapons into our cities and towns and to make Massachusetts safer for law-abiding citizens.�

After the Lieutenant Governor�s shocking and insulting comments, she then gave John Rosenthal, of Stop Handgun Violence, an opportunity to address the press corps. Of course, Mr. Rosenthal took the opportunity to put his spin on the bill as �gun safety legislation.� During his remarks he stated. �We�re not taking guns away from anyone except assault weapons and cheaply made Saturday Night Specials.� Romney officials also gave Mr. Rosenthal an entire paragraph in their official press release, while GOAL was not even mentioned.

After the �stage� had been set, Senator Stephen Brewer and Representative George Peterson were allowed to say a few words. These longtime friends of gun owners spoke on the importance of the reforms the bill made. �This change will go a long way toward fixing the flaws created by the 1998 law,� said Representative George Peterson.

Governor Romney then took the podium to make a few remarks before signing the bill. Although the Governor did make mention of being a �sportsman� and the reforms in the bill that would help other sportsmen, he spun the bill as a ban.

�Deadly assault weapons have no place in Massachusetts ,� Romney said. �These guns are not made for recreation or self-defense. They are instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people.�

When asked by a reporter if he supported the renewal of the federal �assault weapons� ban and if he had spoken to the senators about it, Governor Romney replied that it was not really his job to lobby on federal legislation, but that he shared Senator Kerry�s and Senator Kennedy�s position on the issue!

At no time during the ceremony was the GOAL representative asked to speak and set the record straight on what the bill actually did, nor was GOAL even mentioned in the Governor�s press release. GOAL and its members can only take this display as a complete insult to the lawful gun owners and the hard work that went into making reforms happen.

As our members know, S.2367 did not ban a single gun because the Massachusetts �assault weapons� law, unfortunately, does not expire with the federal law. The bill signed by the Governor actually protects Massachusetts gun owners with a permanent reference to federal definitions that provide them with a list of exempt firearms that numbers nearly 700.



http://web.archive.org/web/20040718190839/www.goal.org/Alerts/reformbillsigned.html">Link to press release



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. Romney is clueless...
...as I mentioned in the other thread, his gullibility on the "assault weapon" bait-and-switch (e.g., outlawing civilian rifles with handgrips that stick out, defensive shotguns, full-sized handguns, etc.) trumps any mealy-mouthed support for "hunters" and "sportsmen," since only 1 in 5 gun owners is a hunter anyway.

And his waffling on the "Brady Bill" as mentioned in the article--I'm assuming the reporter meant the mandatory point-of-sale background check, as the original Brady waiting period/optional check has been superseded by NICS for years, and Romney's waffling on that irrelevancy is silly; even the NRA supports background checks, for crying out loud.

Romney is obviously weathervaning, but it's equally obvious that he doesn't even begin to understand the issue.





--------
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=118&topic_id=97165">Dems and the Gun Issue - Now What? (written in '04, largely vindicated in '06, IMO)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. Mitt McFlippy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rep the dems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. I believe it was Ted Kennedy who characterized him as "multiple choice."
Mitt is proving him right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. Multiple choice Mitt
are there any issues he HASN'T flip-flopped on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Daylin Byak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. By golly Will Mittens have done it again
First it was Abortion they Gay Rights and now he has flip flopped on Guns.

What will Will Mittens flip on next, separation of church and state, tax cuts, national security? what what will he say next?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC