Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Many soldiers say troop surge a bad idea

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 09:48 PM
Original message
Many soldiers say troop surge a bad idea

Many soldiers say troop surge a bad idea

By WILL WEISSERT, Associated Press Writer Thu Dec 28, 12:32 PM ET

BAGHDAD, Iraq - Many of the American soldiers trying to quell sectarian killings in Baghdad don't appear to be looking for reinforcements. They say the temporary surge in troop levels some people are calling for is a bad idea.

President Bush is considering increasing the number of troops in Iraq and embedding more U.S. advisers in Iraqi units. White House advisers have indicated Bush will announce his new plan for the war before his State of the Union address Jan. 23.

In dozens of interviews with soldiers of the Army's 5th Battalion, 20th Infantry Regiment as they patrolled the streets of eastern Baghdad, many said the Iraqi capital is embroiled in civil warfare between majority Shiite Muslims and Sunni Arabs that no number of American troops can stop.

Others insisted current troop levels are sufficient and said any increase in U.S. presence should focus on training Iraqi forces, not combat.

But their more troubling worry was that dispatching a new wave of soldiers would result in more U.S. casualties, and some questioned whether an increasingly muddled American mission in Baghdad is worth putting more lives on the line.

Spc. Don Roberts, who was stationed in Baghdad in 2004, said the situation had gotten worse because of increasing violence between Shiites and Sunnis.

more...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ray of light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Even talking to them in person you know that. That's why I don't
understand why most dems in office are waiting things out. I hope they don't go with Bush's flow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. horse sense ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. First, horses actually DO have more sense than some of our
elected leaders and second, Bush is scared of horses; therefore, this cartoon, while funny, isn't accurate. Bush would sooner milk a horse as ride one. :7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bushies batting average is almost zero...why the hell should our nation Trust him once more???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neuvocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. They should have done it when they had the chance:
go in with higher troop levels. But now its just a huge meat grinder. A larger presence now won't help. They need a comprehensive political plan-like the kinds that were executed in post WW II Germany and Japan where religious and cultural differences were considered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-29-06 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
6. They are of course correct.
"It can't be won militarily. There are not enough forces to try to go in there and post a platoon at every street corner in Baghdad, and if you could, it wouldn't solve the problem anyway." -Wes Clark

http://securingamerica.com/node/2030
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-29-06 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. I heard on WJ (C-Span)this morning that only one major paper picked up this story-
The Philadelphia Inquire.
Hummmmm, I wonder why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC