Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush's military service lacks record of attendance: Bill Press

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 10:33 AM
Original message
Bush's military service lacks record of attendance: Bill Press
http://www.nashvillecitypaper.com/index.cfm?section=40&screen=news&news_id=30602


Commentary by Bill Press
February 10, 2004

The White House bristles at allegations that Bush shirked his National Guard duties, which Republican Chair Marc Racicot calls a "new low" in politics. But there's one way to put the issue to rest. Let President Bush name one guardsman he met during the seven months he served in Alabama. If he can, the issue's dead. If he can't, it's a good sign he's lying.

In 2000, a group of former Alabama guardsmen offered a $3,500 reward to anyone who could remember serving with Lt. George Bush. Nobody came forward.

Is it, as Racicot charges, dirty pool for Cleland to raise this issue? Not at all. Cleland is a decorated Vietnam hero who left both legs and one arm behind on the battlefield. He lost his Senate seat when President Bush went to Georgia and accused him of being unpatriotic because, while he sponsored his own homeland security bill, he dared oppose Bush's version of the same legislation.

Fair is fair. If it was OK for Bush to question triple-amputee Max Cleland's patriotism, it's OK for Max Cleland to question George Bush's military service.

Bill Press is a political analyst for MSNBC and author of Spin This!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lovedems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's Karma so you better watch out chimp, The Dick, and KKKarl.
This is just the tip of the iceberg. Deficits aren't your "due", karma is and you guys are in big trouble!

Go Karma! Work you magic!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. Time to up the ante, Guardsmen
To protect America from treachery, I respectfully suggest that you offer your reward again. Many patriotic Americans would be willing to support you with monetary donations so you could raise the ante.

We would like to know the truth about our selected "commander in chief"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. Absolutely!
I bet Shrub couldn't look Cleland in the eye and tell him he was unpatriotic. Hope Max has a prominant post in the Democratic White House come Jan. 2005.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tim4319 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
4. Let Larry Flint offer the reward.
He has shown in the past that money is no object when it comes to offering rewards. I am sure he could come up with a lot of cash. And, if there is one National Guardsmen, just one, they would come forward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
5. John Kerry offered this about the president's enlistment in the Guard
"People made their choices":

Some went to Canada;
Some went to Jail;
Some went to the National Guard.


In an article introduced by WiseMen, Bush was quoted as saying that:

"I was not prepared to shoot my eardrum out with a shotgun in order to get a deferment. Nor was I willing to go to Canada. So I chose to better myself by learning how to fly airplanes."
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4114162

But the fact is that Bush had a minimal risk of going to Vietnam. He must have known that when he chose the Guard. Everyone else did. It was tough to get in. He must have known that also.

In the Vietnam War:

9.087.000 military personnel served on active duty during the Vietnam era (Aug. 5, 1964-May 7, 1975).

8.744.000 Gls were on active duty during the war (Aug. 5, 1964-March 28, 1973).

National Guard: 6,140 served; 101 died

Reservists killed: 5,977.


In the present conflict

More than 174,000 reservists and National Guardsman are currently on active duty and 34 of them have been killed.


Vietnam Stats from VFW: http://www.ojc.org/NL/march/warriors.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adriennel Donating Member (776 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
6. the old addage
that "thou protesteth too much", Bushie, holds true here. If there is no validity to the claims that Bushie went AWOL, then why does he (and his handlers) get so darn upset whenever the issue comes up??

Bush questioning Cleland's patriotism is unforgivable!!

Bushie joined the Reserves so he could avoid Vietnam and yet still "serve" his country. Now he is sending our Reserves to war in Iraq. I hope this irony is not lost on anyone come the election. It's disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC