Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

How an (I) Becomes a (D) in the Senate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Bob Geiger Donating Member (505 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 12:42 PM
Original message
How an (I) Becomes a (D) in the Senate
Edited on Thu Oct-12-06 01:47 PM by Bob Geiger

When people began jumping on Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) in August for his "failure" to strip Joe Lieberman of his Democratic committee assignments in the wake of Joe's disloyalty to the party in Connecticut, I explained that this was not something that Reid had the power to do unilaterally because of the way Senate committees work.

Committees are put together at the start of each Congressional session, based on many meetings and an 'organizing resolution,' which is voted on in the Senate and that codifies the makeup of each committee for the two years to follow. Reid would have had to propose an amendment to that organizing resolution and get a majority vote on the Senate floor to strip Lieberman of his committees, based on Joe's new status as a turncoat Democrat.

Many readers have written to me asking why I keep including Senator-to-be Bernie Sanders, running as an Independent in Vermont, in my tally of Democratic seats when making my predictions for the balance of power we will ultimately see in the next Senate.

Here's why: Committees are formed based on the roster of Senators pledged to caucus with either Democrats or Republicans, with the committee's party distribution often based on the overall balance of power in the Senate. In other words, while there is no mandated way of distributing committee assignments, a Senate with 60 Democratic Senators and 40 Republicans -- hey, it's a nice thought -- would likely set a committee of ten seats at six Democrats and four Republicans.

At the start of every Senate session, each Senator commits to caucus with one of the two major parties. Of course, members of each party join their own caucus, with Independents like Sanders left to commit one way or the other if they want to enjoy the political advantage of group membership.

Just as he has done in the House of Representatives, Sanders has already made it clear that he will caucus with the Democrats in the Senate so, for organizing reasons, he is considered a part of what we hope will be a Democratic majority, though he will still retain his status as an Independent.

Sanders will end up being one of the most liberal of all Senators and it's well known that he will vote with the Democrats most of the time -- and far more often than the likes of Ben Nelson (D-NE), Mark Pryor (D-AR) and Ken Salazar (D-CO).

And this dynamic has been going on in the Senate since 2001, when Vermont Senator Jim Jeffords decided that the Republican party was no longer consistent with his values and bolted from them in favor of being an Independent. This moved the Senate from a 50-50 split to 50-49-1, which sent Senate Republicans into a tailspin, made still worse when Jeffords declared that he would caucus with Democrats, making it effectively a 51-49 Democratic majority.

So that's the story. Bernie Sanders has always been his own man politically and he will be a powerful and vocal addition to the Democratic caucus when he replaces Jeffords in January. It's just tough in Congress, organizationally speaking, to be a lone wolf.

You can read more from Bob at

Update: I appreciate the 100 or so of you who have written asking me, as one person put it, if my "little predictions take into account the corruption that will occur on Diebold voting machines." Yes, of course, I have thought of that and to all of you asking, yours is hardly an original thought on the subject. But that's all just a little difficult to include in a prediction, considering that the "corruption factor," while obviously present, cannot be clearly defined.

But if it will stop this question from coming, I will give you my prediction of the Senate's composition after the elections this year, 2008 and 2010 based on the emerging presence of GOP/Diebold voting machines: 100-0, Republican controlled. There. Feel better now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. We have a D becoming an I supported by R's in the Senate....
but retaining the positions he had as a D. I never wonder about Bernie's honesty and integrity, I trust him completely.

But I surely do wonder about this CT D who is beoming an I and being supported by, endorsed by, and donated to by R's.

And if you say there is nothing the party leadership can do...then I think we are screwed.

On the other hand, thank God for Bernie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
calico1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I totally agree. There is a huge difference
between the two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ellenfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. kick to read later. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Jul 26th 2017, 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC