Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McLaughlin Group starting on my PBS - 10PM eastern

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 09:02 PM
Original message
McLaughlin Group starting on my PBS - 10PM eastern
Lawrence O'Donnell, Tony Blankley, Pat Buchanan and Eleanor Clift. Should be another barn burner like last week!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Its all about Foley...Woodwards book barely came up...too bad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'm keeping the faith
His book will be tops on the best seller list for a long time. I don't think the issue of Iraq is going anywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joemurphy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Buchanan and Blankley are very pessimistic about the
Republicans' chances in the elections. Good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Mclaughlin told Blankley that he jumped ship
And Buchanan followed up by saying Blankley was the first to do so. That was funny.

Nice that Eleanor Clift did manage to make a long comment about Iraq and Woodward's book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joemurphy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Clift's indefatigable. She's always slugging away in there
against regulars Blankley and Buchanan. McLaughlin, himself, has become much more anti-Bush than he was originally.

I still don't like the format. It's usually Blankley (ultra-conservative); Buchanan (blue-collar, nativist, isolationist, conservative) and Clift (liberal) with, ordinarily, a guest thrown in of varied political colors -- it might be O'Donnell (liberal); Clarence Page (moderate) or someone from the Financial Times (a conservative) or even a foreigner (usually a Brit). The only sure "liberal" voice is Clift and she sometimes has to be strident to get in a word. I've found the McLaughlin group to be a good bellweather of things to come. (I also lament the passing of "The Capital Gang" for the same reasons).

NPR's got good stuff on its programming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. You know I probably think about gay's maybe 1x a week
The repub's must indulge themselves at least once an hour.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. trust me...SOME people are paying attention...see link
Edited on Fri Oct-06-06 09:24 PM by w8liftinglady
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Yeah, the silver spoon from the media has slipped some...so sad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laststeamtrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. Thanks for heads up. O'Donnell's piece @ HuffPo was interesting...
insider stuff.

It's a couple hours away here. For some reason I really like Mc & Co. It's a broader spectrum than most shows in that it includes paleo-cons AND neo-cons in the mix.

Here's the O'Donnell piece from HuffPo:

"Closted Gay Republicans and a Party in Free-fall
By Lawrence O'Donnell

The LA Times has outed Kirk Fordham today. He will not be the last closeted gay Republican outed by this scandal.

Today's NY Times has a chart that outlines the "key communications" in the House of Representatives about Mark Foley's inappropriate contact with pages. More than one of the names in the chart, which includes Kirk Fordham, are rumored to be closeted gay Republicans who have been working at the highest levels of the Republican leadership.

They have been looking at their names in print for the last couple of days and no doubt fearing for their futures in a Party that is in political free-fall.

Are ambitious closeted gay Republican officials, the most reliable people Speaker Hastert could have delegated the Foley problem to last year? Obviously not. Heat on a closeted gay Republican in the House is heat on all closeted gay Republicans in the House. The most innocent Foley emails were enough to worry the parents of the recipient. They were enough to worry the closeted gay Republicans too. But the closeted gay Republicans were perfectly positioned in the House to make the problem disappear.

Now two Republican staffers are locked in a credibility contest: it's Kirk Fordham v. Scott Palmer, Hastert's chief of staff. Palmer flatly denies that Fordham warned him about Foley. Hastert's political life depends entirely on Scott Palmer's credibility. I can't find anyone in Washington who knows Palmer who thinks his credibility can survive this test.

It's no accident that the first call for Hastert's resignation came from Tony Blankley, Newt Gingrich's former press secretary. Tony knows that the scandal cannot die as long as Hastert and his staff are still in the building.

The Republican base--the Evangelical get-out-the-vote troops--are going to be devastated when they discover how many closeted gay Republicans were involved in policing Mark Foley in the House of Representatives. Republican House members know this. That's why momentum is building for a very quick House cleaning and a new Speaker by next week."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fuzzyball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. I love watching that show....wish it was 1 hour instead of the 1/2 hour.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-07-06 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Me too. So much more human than the other hype type's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 04:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC