Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Time to Revisit the Downing Street Memos

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Pryderi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 02:26 AM
Original message
Time to Revisit the Downing Street Memos
Edited on Tue Oct-03-06 02:27 AM by Pryderi
With everything that's come out lately from Rumsfeld threatening to fire people for talking about the aftermath of the Iraq War, to Abramoff's memo regarding the coming Iraq war in March 2002, I think it's time to tie these things together.

The Downing St. Memos were written in July 2002.
<snip>
There was a perceptible shift in attitude. Military action was now seen as inevitable. Bush wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy. The NSC had no patience with the UN route, and no enthusiasm for publishing material on the Iraqi regime's record. There was little discussion in Washington of the aftermath after military action.

http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=node/1

Abramoff KNEW of the invasion MONTHS before the the British did in MARCH of 2002!

CREW sent the emails of Foley to the FBI in July 2006, and I do think the Foley story broke because of the coming together of Woodward's book and Abramoff's memo.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=364&topic_id=2273491&mesg_id=2273491

Abramoff Knew US Would Invade Iraq in March, 2002
by jorndorff
Sat Sep 30, 2006

Newly-disclosed e-mails from the Minority Chair of the House Government Reform Committee Henry Waxman http://www.democrats.reform.house.gov/abramoff/index.as... provide new areas of insight into Jack Abramoff's closeness to the Bush administration. Most shocking of all (at least of those I've been able to read so far) is that Abramoff off-handedly mentions "the upcoming war in Iraq." The date--March, 2002.

The following is available in doc dump two, page 26:



CREW URGES DOJ I.G. TO PROBE WHY FBI FAILED TO INVESTIGATE FOLEY EMAILS SENT BY CREW THIS SUMMER

October 2, 2006 | Washington, DC Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington wrote to the Department of Justice Inspector Generals office today to ask for an investigation into why the Federal Bureau of Investigation failed to begin investigating Rep. Mark Foleys emails to a former House page as soon as the Bureau learned about the emails in July 2006. // read more

http://www.citizensforethics.org/press/newsrelease.php?view=163
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Vexatious Ape Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 02:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's kind of pathetic if you think about
how the mainstream media buried or ignored the Downing Street Memo, but are having a field day with Foley and all his buggery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 05:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. K and r
Edited on Tue Oct-03-06 05:27 AM by SpiralHawk
on account of the corporate media is failing the USA again, and remaining on Bended Knee to serve the corrupt republicon cronies....

Thanks you, Pry, for doing what the corporate kissbutts are failing to do...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Oct 27th 2021, 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC