Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush's record of failure before, during and 5 years after the 9/11attacks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 05:10 PM
Original message
Bush's record of failure before, during and 5 years after the 9/11attacks


5-Minute Video of George W. Bush on the Morning of 9/11

The man responsible for http://www.taylormarsh.com/image.php?id=421&size=large">their deaths is still on the loose.



Passenger Manifest of ' Bin Laden Family Airlift' Out of US One Week After 9/11 Attack (PDF)

Senator Lautenberg Releases Passenger Manifest of ' Bin Laden Family Airlift' Out of U.S. One Week After 9/11 Attack

Lautenberg, Schumer: Why Was a Charter Plane Also Rented by White House Used to Fly Bin Laden Family Out of USA After 9/11?

"The 9-11 Report concludes that none of the Saudi flights 'took place before the reopening of national airspace.' But that misses the point.

The issue with the 'Bin Laden flight' of 9-19 is not whether the airport was open at the time – it clearly was. The issue is whether the Bush Administration and the FBI should have let these Bin Laden family members leave the country so swiftly and without interrogation.

The 9-11 Report makes clear that no interrogation was conducted. Rather 'interviews' were conducted at the airport by an FBI Agent from the Baltimore Field Office.

As the Report indicates, the FBI agent cleared them after passengers claimed that they had 'no recent contact with Osama Bin Laden' and 'knew nothing about terrorist activity.' The passengers were not under oath, they were not interrogated, but were simply interviewed at the airport. If Muhammad Attah was asked such questions on his way out of the country, would he have answered yes?

The 9-11 Report also indicates that two passengers on the 9-19 flight had, in the late 1990's, been under investigation by the FBI for links to terrorism. Despite this, they were allowed to leave, after a cursory, insufficient interview.


The men responsible for their deaths are still telling lies!

The lies of Donald Rumsfeld:

"We said from the outset that there are several terrorist networks that have global reach and that there were several countries that were harboring terrorists that have global reach. We weren't going into Iraq when we were hit on September 11. And the question is: Well, what do you do about that? If you know there are terrorists and you know there's terrorist states -- Iraq's been a terrorist state for decades -- and you know there are countries harboring terrorists, we believe, correctly, I think, that the only way to deal with it is -- you can't just hunker down and hope they won't hit you again. You simply have to take the battle to them. And we have been consistently working on the Al Qaeda network. We've captured a large number of those folks -- captured or killed -- just as we've now captured or killed a large number of the top 55 Saddam Hussein loyalists."
Source: Meet the Press, NBC (11/2/2003).


The lies of Dick Cheney:

"In terms of the question what is there now, we know for example that prior to our going in that he had spent time and effort acquiring mobile biological weapons labs, and we're quite confident he did, in fact, have such a program. We've found a couple of semi trailers at this point which we believe were, in fact, part of that program."
Source: Morning Edition, NPR (1/22/2004).


The lies of George Bush:

"The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa."
Source: President Delivers "State of the Union", White House (1/28/2003).


Never let them forget, hold them accountable:

Donald Rumsfeld – the man who should have been fired as Secretary of Defense long ago – Donald Rumsfeld recently gave a low and ugly speech in which he smeared those who dissent from a catastrophic policy, and then spoke of “moral confusion.”

Well, there certainly is a lot of moral confusion around these days.

It is immoral for old men to send young Americans to fight and die in a conflict without a strategy that can work – on a mission that has not weakened terrorism but worsened it.

It is immoral to lie about progress in that war to get through a news cycle or an election.

It is immoral to treat 9/11 as a political pawn – and to continue to excuse the invasion of Iraq by exploiting the 3,000 mothers and fathers, sons and daughters who were lost that day. They were attacked and killed not by Saddam Hussein but by Osama bin Laden.

Snip...

After all the tough talk of “Wanted Dead or Alive,” after the Administration bragged and boasted – they meekly backed off in the mountains of Tora Bora. Osama bin Laden escaped because the administration held back the best military in the world – our’s – and outsourced the job to local militias. Since then Al Qaeda has spawned a vast and decentralized network operating in 65 countries. Only Dick Cheney could call this a success.

Snip...


“Staying the course” isn’t far-sighted; it’s blind. Leaving our troops in the middle of a civil war isn’t resolute; it’s reckless. Half of the service members listed on the Vietnam Memorial Wall died after America's leaders knew our strategy would not work. It was immoral then and it would be immoral now to engage in the same delusion.

Snip...

We must start treating our moral authority as a precious national asset that does not limit our power but magnifies our influence. Only this week did the Administration finally recognize that the protections of the Geneva Convention had to be applied to prisoners in order to comply with the law, restore our moral authority, and best protect American troops. Let me say it plainly: No American president should be for torture before he’s against it.

-- John Kerry September 9, 2006



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. yep
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. So sad! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. K&R - A good reminder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. This Is My FIRST Foray Today Regarding What Went On Today...
I just couldn't bring myself to watch all the crap all over again! But, alas here I am again feeding some morbid addiction I have to stay informed, when mostly I feel helpless to make any changes.

It's so sad that this country has been brought down to this level, where it's citizens think more about FEAR than focusing on plans to correct so much that is wrong now. America has become a very divided nation and it grieves me to see what this administration has done to perpetuate this. I could never have imagined myself thinking this way 6 years ago. I've been a political junky for many many years, have seen Democrats lose and have dealt with it thinking in time the pendulum would swing back the other way again.

Now? I have cynicism and apathy and for that my heart aches!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Very will expressed, thanks
This past week has been almost more than any Dem. can handle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. "No American president should be for torture before he’s against it."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Too bad kerry's speech didn't get ANY press time other
than C-Span. And then the repubs say that the Dems have no answers. Kerry was full of answers and explainations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_dynamicdems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. K & R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. "America did not ask for this war.."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. President - March, 2003 .....
This guy is a piece of work isn't he:

"The enemies you confront will come to know your skill and bravery. The people you liberate will witness the honorable and decent spirit of the American military. In this conflict, America faces an enemy who has no regard for conventions of war or rules of morality. Saddam Hussein has placed Iraqi troops and equipment in civilian areas, attempting to use innocent men, women and children as shields for his own military -- a final atrocity against his people.

-snip-

We come to Iraq with respect for its citizens, for their great civilization and for the religious faiths they practice. We have no ambition in Iraq, except to remove a threat and restore control of that country to its own people."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
9. A strong argument could be made that W has been eminently successful
in implementing the PNAC agenda, aided by a subservient Congress, a compliant MSM, and tens of millions of Amerikans who do not like our Constitution, this Republic, and have something else in mind like a theological, corporatist, totalitarian police-state type of government: to wit, a success of the first magnitude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Except that 33% to 38% is not larger than 62% to 67%! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Those who control all power and the media don't give a shit what 62%-
67% of the people think and never will as long as elections can be stolen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Agree they don't give a shit, but the struggle going on now
Edited on Tue Sep-12-06 01:54 PM by ProSense
means that the 62% realizes it is also powerful, and the Bushies also realize that. Now to translate that power into putting an end to election fraud!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-13-06 03:46 AM
Response to Original message
16. For the record
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC