Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We should all be very carefull.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Scooter24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 09:41 PM
Original message
We should all be very carefull.
Edited on Sun Sep-10-06 09:42 PM by Scooter24
We all need to be very careful not to let anyone frame the Democratic party as "weak" on terror based off the lies exploited in tonight's ABC movie.

Yes, the movie was awful. Yes, there are lies. But I think we need to spend the next several weeks after 9/11 focusing on the Bush and GOP scenario and not what did or did not happen during Clinton's presidency.

We as a party need to say focused and need to hit back harder than ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. let them call us weak on terror
and they may get a punch in the nose.

yellowstain republicans are the most worst sort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. If anyone says that to me
I'm going to respond by telling them: "YOU'RE the one who is eager to cede our rights and civil liberties for the promise of protection, not me! Who are YOU calling weak, chickenshit?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. just don't use the word "cede" -- they won't understand it.
it would be better to say "eager to give up our rights and freedoms" (civil liberties is too vague a term for them)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yeah that's true
They'd think 'seed' and that I had some good pot or something. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, we have to stay focused.
It was interesting that they did show that certain things DID happen during Clinton's administration: The WTC truck bombers were caught and convicted, training camps in Afghanistan were bombed, and the LAX bombing at the millenium was prevented.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danascot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. You'd almost think that
Clinton did a better job of foiling terror than the next pResident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. He did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. but these are fake positions, both of them...
weak vs. strong... a real position would be honesty vs. lie, arrogant vs. mindful... the war on terror is what the Republicans gave us to sell elections and the dems need to give it back ... so i would rather we simply respond every single time they mention "dems weak on terror"

If Republicans are so strong on security, then why is it they went into the wrong country, killed thousands of innocent people, while our own country is even less safe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. Not hit back. Hit.
Hit them proactively, not just when hit.

Hot those corrupt marianas-island-sweatshop child labor forced abortion phony "made in USA" textile label wage destroying pension stealing anti-worker anti-environment warmongering terrormongering lawbreaking system perverting sexual deviant classist bastards for what they are.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. Bush talked tough about "Osama dead or alive". He's the failure.
:puke: Screw anyone who dares to say that Dems are weak or soft on terrorism.

Bush and his boys took their eye off the ball.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 03:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC