Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AP: Bush Confident GOP Will Hold Congress

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 01:14 PM
Original message
AP: Bush Confident GOP Will Hold Congress
Bush Confident GOP Will Hold Congress

The Associated Press
Saturday, September 9, 2006; 1:40 PM

WASHINGTON -- President Bush says he believes Republicans will retain
control of the Congress after the November elections, even as members
of his own party predict a loss of some seats.

Dismissing the possibility the top House Democrat, Rep. Nancy Pelosi
of California, could rise to House speaker if the GOP lost its majority,
the president said, "That's not going to happen."

-snip-

In an interview with The Wall Street Journal's editorial page editor,
Bush was commenting on how he planned to resurrect his push
to change Social Security next year when he was reminded that some
polls show Democrats were likely to win control of at least the House.

"I just don't believe it," the president told Paul Gigot, according
to an account published Saturday.

-snip-

Full article: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/09/AR2006090900440.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, sure he is...
Why would he choose to live outside his fantasy land now? He would have to sober up first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R to expose that Bush is crazy
And that he wants to resurrect an idea that has been REJECTED.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Either crazy, or the coup happens the day before election day!!!!
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. I don't understand the meme..
.. floating around that the Dems can win Congress but not the Senate.

Why not both?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. We CAN but it's much harder todefeat a sitting Senator than it is a
Representative! Entire States vote for Senators, so you have a lot more people to convert to your side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Also, in Senate races, people "vote the man, not the party"
That's why candidates like Tom Kean Kr. and Michael Steele are so close in NJ and MD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. I have to say "sometimes" to your comment.
I well remember Max Clelland v/s Saxby Chambliss here in Ga.

I agree many times the charasmatic candidate wins, but sometimes you have to relly hunt for reasons why Stevens from AK, Graasley from IA, Sessions from AL, and many others, get relected? Collectively, they have the charisma of a junk yard dog!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. Don't you know his party loves how he promoting turn out
Sometimes it's almost as if he has no clue about politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. Of xourse! What else would you expect him to say?
I strongly suggest we get some very good poll watchers in Nov though! Last time I hear the idiot say something like that was when they told him he lost Fl. in 2000, and he said "That can't be!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. The same confidence that his demented little brain
demonstrated when he could not conceive of a notion that S.A. would have nothing at all to justify the criminal cabal's invasion of Iraq.

Seems to me his dismissive imagination is what got us into this whole mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlamoDemoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. this turd is cris-crossing the country yelling national security, but
who's listening, right?
Are the Democrats doing the same...unlike the last election? or as usual, that they will be caught flat-kerry-syndrome once again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RangerSmith Donating Member (488 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. It's not like this is headline news...
but he is definitely delusional.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. after the last six years...
any thing is possible. Linear thought is useless, logic is twisted, the definition of age-old words mutilated, and reality is highly questionable. Contemplating current events leads me into a maze from which I emerge way more baffled. I keep going back looking for the piece of the puzzle that will settle my mind. It's insane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
12. As long as Bushco uses Diebold's there will be no problem for GOP
We were forced to buy the 2004 election, why does anyone seem to think mr. Bush can't/won't do it again?? any takers? I doubt it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. I agree with you
The dems will not control anything until Diebold is no longer stealing our votes. The increase in speeches, the movie on ABC, the Bin Laden tapes surfacing again just before the elections are cover to justify the sudden and unexpected voting results.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave123williams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
13. Can you say, 'Out of touch'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
14. Well, let's see, he's been wrong about everything so far....
Hopefully he's wrong again. Oftenwrong bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rageneau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
16. BartCop speculates that Bush might stage a 'terror' event and ...
call off elections.

He could then excercise his new "extraordinary powers" to declare martial law and establish a dictatorship -- a form of government he says he favors, so long as he gets to be the dictator.

My opinion is that Bush WOULD do something like that if he thought he could get away with it. And he very well might.

After all, who's free enough and brave enough to stop him, in today's land of the formerly free and home of the formerly brave?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
19. He who struts last, struts best.
The last few elections the Republicans have all but given notice that they were going to pick our pockets and then they went right ahead and did it. They have no reason to believe that they cannot do it again. Winning back either house of Congress is not a done deed until the election is over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
20. bush* was also confident that Iraq had WMD and that
we would be welcomed with flowers and mission was accomplished. He's running an average of 0% correctness. What are the chances that he'll be correct this time...if we have a fair election. He must know something we don't know in order to have the nerve/hubris/balls to utter such a prediction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
21. Well, and, as we all know, the Amazing Bushkin
can't foretell what he's going to have for breakfast.

Leave the predictions to the intelligent, shrub-boy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
22. He knows what many Americans do not yet know, that...
...all the votes are now "counted" electronically, using TRADE SECRET, PROPRIETARY programming code, owned and controlled by the following Bushite corporations:

DIEBOLD: Until recently, headed by Wally O'Dell, a Bush-Cheney campaign chair and major fundraiser (a Bush "Pioneer," right up there with Ken Lay), who promised in writing to "deliver Ohio's electoral votes to Bush-Cheney in 2004"; and

ES&S: A spinoff of Diebold (similar computer architecture), initially funded by rightwing billionaire Howard Ahmanson, who also gave one million dollars to the extremist 'christian' Chalcedon Foundation (which touts the death penalty for homosexuals, among other things). Diebold and ES&S have an incestuous relationship; they are run by two brothers, Bob and Todd Urosevich.

These are the people who "counted" 80% of the nation's votes in 2004, under a veil of corporate secrecy. Their power is even more entrenched now, fast-tracked by a nearly $4 billion electronic voting boondoggle, engineered by the biggest crooks in the Anthrax Congress, Tom Delay and Bob Ney (now indicted or resigned in bribery scandals), with the Democratic Party leadership too afraid or too corrupt to object (a situation that has not changed).

SEQUOIA: The third major election theft industry player, which hired Republican former Calif Secretary of State Bill Jones, and his chief aide, Alfie Charles, to peddle their machines--in an outstanding example of the highly corrupt practice of "revolving door" employment.

-------------------------------

Non-transparent elections are NOT elections. They are tyranny. That's what we have. You wonder how Bush can be so arrogant? This is why.

------------------------------

The only way I can see of reforming this election system peacefully, and quickly, is a MASSIVE citizen revolt against the machines this fall, by ABSENTEE BALLOT VOTING. It won't give us an accurate vote count this fall (that is impossible), but, if enough people vote by AB--say, if all those who despise the Bush Junta (65% to 70%) vote by Absentee Ballot--we CAN create sufficient panic and crisis in the election theft industry to FORCE reform NOW--and save the '08 primaries and general election from secret corporate vote "counting" controlled by Bushites.

Really, friends, this is IT. If we let Stolen Election III go by without effective, large-scale protest against secret vote "counting," I don't know if we will have another opportunity. Bush is already claiming an Emperor's powers. He has 30% support, at best--and yet he gets to write our laws, torture, kill, detain without charge, spy on us, rob us blind, and rip up our Constitution at his whim?

You may think he's delusional, when he says the Bushites will "win." I think that's a mistake. He and his Junta have the power to steal this election, and what is there to stop them?

Our only hope is pressuring election officials at the state/local level , where the decisions about voting systems are still made, and where ordinary people still have some influence. And our only option is to make their lives miserable this November with MASSIVE Absentee Ballot voting, as a protest against the machines. BOYCOTT the machines! Let them sit idle! And show these election officials up for the corrupt fools they are. We must FORCE reform NOW. The system is NOT going to correct itself. WE, the people, must correct it, by our concerted revolt against these rigged electronic voting systems.

BUST THE MACHINES--VOTE BY ABSENTEE BALLOT THIS NOVEMBER!

------------------------------

Important notes: AB votes are not "safe" either. In some cases, they are merely scanned into the rigged electronic system. In others, they are disregarded, and counted "later"--after the rigged e-voting totals are announced. But if, say, 70% of the people boycott the machines, and vote by AB, then corrupt election officials will be "calling" the election on the basis of one third of the vote (the e-vote). That is absurd, and it WILL expose this fraud. A massive AB voting protest will bring increased scrutiny to how AB votes are handled, and to the whole system. You can't really run elections, in a supposed democracy, when most people have "no confidence" in the election system. There ARE many ways to improve handling and security of AB votes. (Oregon has been doing it for some time.) And e-voting, run on "trade secret," proprietary code, is by far THE most insecure and riggable system. Even the optiscans are highly insecure and riggable--and ALL the machines, including the central tabulators, are run on completely non-transparent "trade secret" code. With the optiscans, you vote on a ballot, but your vote is then separated from the evidence of your vote (the ballot), and your "vote" becomes a bunch of electrons which are "sent" to the central tabulator where your "vote" is EASILY changed. Your ballot is dumped into a box and almost never seen again. At best, there is a 1% audit (completely inadequate in this INVISIBLE high-speed electronic environment). Many states have NO audit. And recounts are expensive, difficult and extremely rare, in this new culture of secrecy that Bushite corporations have brought to our election system. ALL these SECRETLY coded machines must go--including the optiscans. Right now, some AB voting is no more safe from rigged totals than optiscan votes are. That's why we cannot expect accurate vote counts this fall, even with a massive AB voting protest. But an Absentee Ballot vote is a monkey wrench in the system. It is NON-COOPERATION. It is a BOYCOTT, a PROTEST. And if it's massive, it will be a massive monkey wrench that will bring this election theft industry to its knees. The AB voting protest will benefit our democracy, and it has no downside. It will help turnout. It's a great motivator for disillusioned non-voters--to be part of a protest aimed at un-rigging the system. It precisely targets the mechanism of Bushite tyranny. It is a means of FORCING reform. It is the only option we have left for November--and may save the '08 elections from electronic rigging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
23. the trouble is
* knows who is counting the votes. I just don't trust that this election will be clean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Riddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. They'll either controll the vote againe like they did the last 2 times, or
this whole Taliban/Pakistan amnesty thing is a ruse and they've already got Osama captured and in one of their secret CIA prisons with his "capture" to miraculously happen just prior to the election. Ok, so my tin-foil hat is getting all dented, it still fits!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC