Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Santorum smacks Casey; trouble in PA

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
espera17 Donating Member (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:44 AM
Original message
Santorum smacks Casey; trouble in PA
If Casey's debate performance this morning is replicated in the other debates, expect Santorum to be reelected in November. This is PA, not CA, and the people here won't vote for someone with no position on issues. (aka Lynn Swann)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. WHAT WERE YOU WATCHING???..HMMM...N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eccles12 Donating Member (385 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
69. I thought Casey was terrible. Grinned too much when he should have been
shouting back at Rick. These Dems need to take some lessons from Al Sharpton if they want to be able to handle the RW-talking points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. Did you see the debate?
Santorum played the idiot son part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. The very thought that we might have to suffer through another term
for Santorum just gave me a headache. It really did. I don't think I can listen to his crooked, hypocritical, lying, obscene mouth any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. Wow
Santorum looked like an idiot. Oh wait, he always does. He looked like a spoiled ignorant brat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
5. I posted a year ago that Casey was trouble
He's just another bland, antichoice, DLC conservative.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. I disagree with you. Santorum IS a very arrogant person,
and it sure showed today! I was really surprised when I saw the poll results of that debate! It showed 79% thought Ricky won and 23% thought Casey won. Igrew up in Pgh. and still have a lot of friends there. EVERYONE I talk to says theywant Ricky GONE!

He's pissed off a lot of women by writing in his bookthet "Most women work because they WANT TO not because they NEED to. Awoman's place is in the home, raising her children full time."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #12
29. I didn't see it..
... but assuming that arrogance is a disqualifier for public office is a mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
6. Not what I have read elsewhere today.
I did not watch it, but I hear Casey did very well.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
44. He didn't do very well, but I think he "won" ..
by a hair, a draw at worst ...

First, I was surprised that Russert actually was tougher on Santorum than Casey ... He nailed him on the house issue, would not let him skate around it until he finally blurted out that he spends maybe a month a year there ... He also would not let him lie about the Saddam/Al Queda connections or the bizarre 500 mustard gas shells being proof of WMD ...

I think the debate showed the weaknesses of both candidates ... Casey, not the sharpest tool in the shed ... Santorum as the arrogant, win at all costs, saying anything he needs to win freak he is ... Casey did not shine, but as others noted, Casey did come across as the lying puke, and maniac he is ...

I would ask anyone who saw the debate to note what Santorum's plan was for Iraq ... Check out the repeat tonight, and you will see, his plan for Iraq basically is to put things in motion to start another war with Iran ... Casey does not impress me a lot ... But, he is a decent man at least ... Santorum is freakin insane ...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #44
68. Agree with you Cat
I wasn't impressed with Casey at all, but I'd say he won slightly or drew.

Santorum said he had no ideas, and Russert stuck with that point for a while, and he really didn't have anything.

On balancing the budget he said he'd raise taxes on the wealthy which Russert said would raise about 1/4 what he needed. Then he said he'd make a 3.5 million estate tax, which he said would save money, and Santorum correctly said that would actually cost money since current law has it going back to 1 million.

Santorum was bad and Russert got him time after time, but Casey didn't impress me either.

I'd call it a win for Casey since he's ahead and doesn't need to win. Bland is fine when you're up double digits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
7. Don't frigging post something
and take up more space when you already posted the same shit. Vote how you want, but don't be so rude as to post another diary. It's unnecessary and thoughtless to everyone who posts.

PLEASE DELETE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
8. love your CA bash
:eyes:

That whole recall mess was a fucking joke and not setup where the majority would win. Let's not even start on CA. two words for that comment: BARBARA BOXER
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #8
21. Nini: Your baby has a beautiful smile! : ^ ) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. That's my grandson
:D Thanks!


Grandkids are wayyyyy more fun than our own!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
globalvillage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
9. I thought Casey was impressive.
Ricky was angry and defensive, while Casey appeared rational and intelligent.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
10. Santorum came across as defensive and unlikeable
and very angry.

Casey came across as smart, charming, calm and charismatic.

What planet did you watch this debate from?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #10
67. That's How I Saw It Too
Santorum was pissed off and especially nasty when he took a shot about Casey's deceased father "I think his father would be very upset if, if he were alive today and, and heard him be supportive of something like this." (Plan B)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
11. It's interesting to see how much attention the reichwing gives DU.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue neen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Ain't that the truth, though.
You can smell Santorum's desperation all the way from Virginia!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. He FEARS us!
SWEET!! :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
13. Santorum got his ass kicked.....big time..
I watched the entire debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Singular73 Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
15. I didn't think Casey clearly won
Santorium came off as his usual nutty self, but Casey had no stance on any issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mira Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #15
34. That's how I saw it, too. I was disappointed in Casey.
There he is, facing a nationwide forum as he has a an arrogant ass-wipe, Bush - clone opponent who is scared and running behind. Yet,even in the face of all this support of failed policies mentioned many times by Russert (I think it was 93 or so percent blind support of Bush votes on his record) he is unable to wipe the floor with the guy.

I had to mute it a number of times just to wipe the cursewords I muttered off the screen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #15
37. I agree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #15
52. No stance? What were you watching?
I won't say he was perfectly direct on every issue, but he was pretty direct on most of them:

IWR - yes with the SAME evidence today as in 2004 he would vote for it
IWR - NO with TODAY's evidence then, in 2004 he would NOT have voted for it
Balance the budget - repeal the tax cut for the top 2%
Morning After Pill - it is contraception not abortion and it is good for it to be available

I could go on...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
17. Funny. I'll bet you think Bush is a master debater as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
18. "I'd do X, Y, and Z."... "See? He has no plans!"
"No position on issues?" I thought Casey did a fine job stating his positions. You may agree or disagree with them, but he was quite clear.

Santorum kept trying to say Casey didn't have positions, didn't answer questions, and didn't have plans, while Casey kept stating his positions, answering questions, and outlining specific plans!

It's interesting you're repeating Santorum's line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
espera17 Donating Member (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #18
55. he didnt have positions
the only things he mentioned were repealing the tax cuts and the estate tax reduction.. thats it period.. he had no specifics for anything just generalizations. he wouldnt even name one gov't program he would get rid of. one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #55
58. he did say he'd hire fewer consultants, stop tax breaks for outsourcing
and reduce corporate welfare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #55
59. Is there a program you would get rid of?
This is a Republican trick. They don't consider that you can also eliminate some of the huge tax cuts scheduled to take place. This increases the money coming in at a later point - same effect as decreasing spending.

He did say control waste - everyone does. Most discretionary programs aid people and were fought for by Democrats. Cutting the military is not a winner now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fuzzyball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #55
61. We need many more government programs....NOT less!!!
This is a rich country and no one should be forced
to work for small wages. The minimum wage should be
hiked to atleast $15/hour so everyone can afford a
decent living. We need more government spending to help
the underclass and get that money from hiking taxes on
every one making more than $100,000/year. Tax the hell
out of the rich so the poor can live well without being
forced into slave labor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemInDistress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
19. rick said,,but I live in PA for a month out of the year I even go to
a PA dentist..(rotf)..

While Casey didn't impress me much Ricky certainly looked like the loser he is.. PA is a Democratic state only given to Rick by the hedger's and I now feel those hedger's will vote Democratic in Nov.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
globalvillage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. Well, his teeth aren't that nice.
Maybe he should find a dentist near his home in VA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countingbluecars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. Loudoun County, where Ricky really lives,
was just named the wealthiest county in the nation. Lots of good dentists here. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
20. Well this is going to be an interesting political season. Fighting it
Edited on Sun Sep-03-06 11:11 AM by Mountainman
out right here on DU, what fun. Both sides posting their talking points. To me this was a debate by two right wingers. I don't know why Dems can't find someone who is pro choice in PA. I hope women turn out in great numbers and some time in the future run a woman in this state and really knock the chauvinist pigs back into their mud holes where they belong. I want the Dem to win because it increases our numbers but please lean a little more left next time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. We're in battle with freepers on DU.
I can deal with it. :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SPCAworks Donating Member (112 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #23
33. I'm surprised
the thread hasn't been deleted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #20
60. Casey is not RW - nor LW
But he is a Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluzmann57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
22. From what I saw
Edited on Sun Sep-03-06 11:15 AM by Bluzmann57
Santorum never shut up. He wanted Casey to "let me finish" and never finished and also interrupted Casey a number of times. I don't know about the good people of Pennsylvania, but here in Iowa, a performance like that would sour people on the candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. Santorum was angry and hostile
Casey was engaged and charming.

A blind bat can see who won this debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #22
45. That bothered me too. He tried and many time succeeded in
using up more of his share of the (hot) air time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
28. I loved Santorum's response to "Plan B" and the follow-up
question about why he would vote for an anti-abortion bill that had exceptions for rape, etc. The nonimplantation of an egg which may or may not be fertilized vs. a fetus. I hope he has services over the toilet once a month when his wife has her period, because you never know when another offspring might circle the bowl.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
30. Casey wins this seat in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
31. Wasn't watching but I could hear it from another room
Sounded to me like Santorectum was angry and defensive and it also sounded like russert for once was attempting to hold his feet to the fire at least a little. I'm not that familiar with Ricky but the sound of his voice is unpleasant and a turnoff to voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
retread Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
32. I'm going to assume we saw the same show. If you equate shouting,
interrupting, petulant defensiveness, and a general tone of anger, as "winning" a debate then you are correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kstewart33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #32
35. Unfortunately, being a jerk sometimes works.
I saw the entire debate. Casey was too soft and vague on some issues. He needs to come out swinging on some issues and not let Santorum lecture to him, especially about his dad.

But, hopefully the Casey campaign will make the needed adjustments before the state level debates before the election. I'm assuming there will be one or two, when people really begin paying attention to the race.

Little Ricky did sound shrill and defensive at times but he stayed more on attack than Casey, IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. SLICK RICK
Santorum looked like a phony used car salesman, with canned answers. He looked like a career politician who mastered the art of talking out of both sides of his mouth.

Casey is not as progressive in his politics as I would like, but he looked calm and rational.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #32
63. Most RWers do ewuate shouting, etc, along with a large dose
of lying and cheating as "winning a debate."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
38. I thought Casey was lame too
He gave mostly rambling answers with few specifics. Casey looked especially bad when he couldn't give a succinct answer about why he favored over the counter morning after pill sales while being pro life. Russert asked Casey when life begins and Casey didn't answer the question at all. That showed no courage or convictions.

Casey angered me when Russert asked Casey if the Democratic Party in Congress is obstructionist and Casey agreed. I hope others didn't notice and Casey gets a good quiet talking to.

On the other hand, I thought Santorum, while not losing to Casey, lost to Russert. Santorum did a good job defending himself under the circumstances but Russert brought up too many negatives about Santorum for Santorum to explain away. Santorum got very angry and spent most of the last 10 minutes pointing his finger in an aggressive manner.

Anger runs counter to Santorum's previous strategy. Santorum saturated the airwaves with ads that made made him look like a warm fuzzy moderate. It was a perfect strategy because the votes Santorum needed to pick up were among moderates. It also put Casey in a bind because Santorum was positive and moderates don't like negative campaigns against warm fuzzy moderate guys. Casey would have had to go negative if Santorum picked up the moderates and made it close.

Santorum's strategy was brilliant and I praised it myself. The only problem the strategy had was it didn't work at all. It picked up no votes for Santorum.

So if Santorum now wants to be the angry guy that frees up Casey to go negative. Santorum has far more to lose in a negative/negative race because there is so much dirt on Santorum. Casey didn't offer new targets this morning.

I think Casey lost the battle but may have helped himself in the war.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rep the dems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. Casey clearly stated that he believes life begins at conception.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. Thank you
I was wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rep the dems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #41
48. No problem.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
39. Santorum's strong, simple, wrongheaded, big-picture debate, indeed, WON.
I agree with you. His performance, IMO, outweighs whatever was said in the eyes of most viewers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. I disagree...
I watched the entire debate, body language and all, and it seemed to me that Rick Santorum was responding like a desperate politician. I did question why Casey would go on national TV to debate, MTP nonetheless, with such a huge lead. Why would he gamble?

That said, I was surprised by Casey. I actually expected him to do worse. I thought he did very well. Santorum simply has so much baggage that it is impossible to explain away. Livng in VA, sending his kids to private school at PA taxpayer expense, voting himself pay raises in Congress as he criticizes the state employees of PA, voting with George W Bush 98% of the time, his totally irrational explanations for the war in Iraq, etc... I cannot understand how anyone could look at this same debate and think that Santorum won??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #43
50. You could be right, kentuck.
And, I'll admit, I was distracted and missed the part when his living in Virginia was addressed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rep the dems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #39
62. But what made his performance all that great? And it seems to me
that while some people might agree with some things he said, they may have been distracted by how desperate and antsy he was. And as I've said many times today: Remark about Casey's father=Below the belt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #62
65. That remark was contemptible, indeed. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
42. I saw it. It was a wash. Neither one gained any ground.
Still, Casey has time to polish up fr the state level debates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
46. Santorum vs Grandson Gorilla....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
47. I thought both of them sucked.
But, hopefully this debate won't matter and Casey will win in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJ Democrats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
49. I saw part of it
and while I think Casey was pretty bad, Santorum came off to me as a crazy, angrey man with bad ideas. Like, claiming he's indeoendent of the prez when there was a list thatr went up showing he voted w/ Bush, 96, 97, 99, 100! (How the hell do you vote with someone EVERY TIME?), 95. Someone explain to me how that is independent?
Casey won the debate of Santorum, bairley though, and I think Russert did a better job against Santorum then Casey. But Casey still wins this seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. Yep ..
I live here in PA, and I can honestly say that I have felt that Casey is not the sharpest tool in the shed all along, but that he was the only shot to take down Santorum ...

Santorum is insane ... If you paid any attention, his "plan" for Iraq basically is to start another war with Iran ...

I also agree that Russert was tougher on Santorum ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
53. Your forecast,
"expect Santorum to be reelected in November", is smashed by the latest Gallup poll (August 23-27):

Santorum: 38%
Casey: 56%

Bye Ricky!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Penndems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
54. Here's my response:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue neen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #54
56. I also thought that Casey did the right thing by acknowledging
O'Connor's death. That is showing true respect.

Contrast that to Santorum saying that Casey's dead father would be ashamed of him. Santorum is disrespectful and beyond rude. There are not enough words to describe how despicable he really is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
57. Casey would have a problem if Santorum wasn't batshit insane
Santorum arguably did better in the debate than Casey did, but his positions are so extreme that he continued to make himself look like an ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
64. Remember this quote from Santorum..and use it often!
Remember this quote from Santorum..and use it often!

" President . . . is once again releasing American military might on a foreign country with an ill-defined objective and no exit strategy. He has yet to tell the Congress how much this operation will cost. And he has not informed our nation's armed forces about how long they will be away from home. These strikes do not make for a sound foreign policy."
--Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
66. I thought Casey did great on M-t-P
Santorum parroting the nonsense about WMD should make him ineligible for public office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC