Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pombo Forcing Vote on Arctic Refuge Drilling this Week

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
sarahlee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 01:50 AM
Original message
Pombo Forcing Vote on Arctic Refuge Drilling this Week
Edited on Wed May-24-06 01:56 AM by sarahlee
Cross post from Daily Kos:

by Naturegal
Tue May 23, 2006 at 06:22:26 PM CST

Yes, I know you're sick of hearing about this issue -- but guess what? That's exactly how Richard Pombo and his Big Oil buddies want you to feel. They think if they keep bringing Arctic Refuge drilling up for a vote -- again, and again, and again -- you will give up! So don't!

As soon as tomorrow, Pombo will force a vote on his "American-Made Energy and Good Jobs Act" (HR 5429), which will call for drilling in the Arctic Refuge.

So you need to contact your representative if there is even the slightest chance they will fall for this, because maybe your rep wants to head back to their district during the holiday and claim they helped lower gas prices. Ha!

Tell your rep to oppose any legislation that would allow drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Remind them that drilling in the Arctic Refuge will lower gas prices only a penny a gallon in 2025. And if you're feeling gabby, remind them that Congress should focus on developing clean, renewable energy resources, as well as promoting fuel efficiency. Oh yeah, and tell them to stop giving $4 billion tax breaks to the oil industry, for cryin' out loud.

Remember, Pombo and Big Oil want to wear you down. Don't let it happen.

You can call the Capitol Switchboard at 202-224-3121 to be instantly connected to your Representative. Go get 'em.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/5/23/202226/230

From another source:
This bill (HR5249)authorizes the Interior Department to grant leases for oil and gas exploration, development, and production in the coastal plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) in Alaska. The first lease sale, through a competitive bidding process, would be conducted within 22 months of enactment of this legislation and be for at least 200,000 acres. Annual sales would be held thereafter. The total area authorized for drilling is about 1.5 million acres, but the total amount of surface area covered by production facilities, such as drilling platforms or airstrips, would be 2,000 acres.

In the 109th Congress, the ANWR provision has been attached to the House version of the recent energy policy law (PL 109-58), then to the Senate version of the budget reconciliation measure (PL 109-171), and then to the conference agreement on FY 2006 Defense Appropriations (PL 109-148). In all of those cases, however, the provision threatened to sink the larger measure, and had to be removed. Most recently, the Senate attached the ANWR provision to its budget resolution (S Con Res 83), but it is likely to be removed in conference negotiations with the House.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. K & R and bookmarked...
so I can kick it tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarahlee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Many Thanks
I've got to get to bed!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's as if that Roman senator was saying "ANWR must be destroyed!"
at the end of all his speeches instead of "Carthage must be destroyed!". Which eventually happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 02:04 AM
Response to Original message
4. Or you can use the toll free number -> 1-877-SOB-U-SOB
Whoever assigned that number has a sense of humor. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 04:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. Pombo kick.


May his dirty plot against ANWR fail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarahlee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Cheney has been fundraising for him
So I guess this is payback.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 06:01 AM
Response to Original message
6. kicking this -- cause i can't kick pombo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
7. This slimy SOB is relentless...
He must be due for a monster kickback..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
9. Why isn't Richard Pombo in jail?
Hey Mr. Pombo, instead of despoiling ANWR, why don't you get your oil company buddies to shoulder a little share of the cost of the war we're sending America's sons and daughters to die for? Seems to me Exxon and the others, having made the greatest profits in corporate history, could stand to pitch in if only the tiniest bit. "Resolved, that all oil now coming out of Alaska be sold to the U.S. market."

How about it, Mr. Pombo?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarahlee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I made my call this am
and then got lost in reading about the Roots Project about delivering copies of Crashing the Gate to all the Democrats in the House and Senate yesterday. (and working a little)

Anyway, I noted that the Kucinich.us site got the link to the bill up when it got posted to Thomas today.
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:h.r.05429:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joey Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. Pombo is an evil fuck n.t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
12. kick!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarahlee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
13. Just got this in the Inbox
HOUSE TAKES DIRECT AIM AT ARCTIC
Stand-alone Bill Offered as Political Cover

In a frankly political move to help Republicans who may find it useful to tally a vote for Arctic drilling amid concern back home over high gas prices, HR 5429 will be on the floor this week for a straight up or down vote on drilling in the Arctic Refuge.

Arctic Shell Game
Given the track record of the House, we expect to lose this vote — as we have in the past. The House leadership is playing a shell game because prospects for getting a similar proposal through the Senate have failed countless times — House proponents know that this bill is going nowhere but hope to make political hay from it. However, it's very important that we not lose ground in the House.

Please take a moment to let your House member know, again, that a vote for drilling in the Arctic Refuge — however symbolic — is a vote for big oil, has-been thinking and lack of leadership in our current energy situation. Please send an email registering your impatience with this pointless attack on the Arctic Refuge.

Penny in Twenty
As both the House and the Senate consider their energy options, they need to understand one thing: opening the Refuge is never an option.

In reality, drilling in the Arctic Refuge won't provide relief at the pump. According to government experts at the Energy Information Administration, oil from the Refuge would reduce gas prices by only a penny per gallon -- and that wouldn’t happen until 2025. In fact, the first drop of Arctic oil, if there is any, wouldn't even come online for seven to ten years.

What drilling would do is ruin one of America’s greatest sanctuaries for wildlife.

Please contact your House Member. We cannot be complacent with this vote. A sign of weakeness will be quickly exploited by the pro-drillers

Message: We can't drill our way out of dependence on oil. We need real solutions to our energy needs. Opening the Arctic Refuge is not an answer. Any bill that drills in the Arctic Refuge is unsupportable.

More Ammunition
• In 2000, when gas prices were much lower, the Environmental Protection Agency estimated that just a 3 mile-per-gallon improvement in mileage would save Americans $25 billion per year at the pump -- $230 a year for every American household.

• Better gas mileage would also conserve one million barrels of oil per day -- more than would ever come from the Refuge.

• More efficient cars would reduce carbon emissions by 140 metric tons annually, helping to reduce global warming.

Why Should the Arctic Refuge be Protected?
The Arctic Refuge will become an industrialized oil production complex. The coastal plain of the refuge contains unique bird habitat and is critical to the survival of the Porcupine caribou herd. While proponents of opening the Refuge to drilling argue that only 2,000 acres of the Refuge’s “1002 Area” would be affected, the industrial oil complex would require a sprawling matrix of roads, pipelines, drilling pads, processing plants, gravel mines, and airports.

Oil production will result in pollution. In some cases, the oil fields adjacent to the refuge average more than one toxic spill a day.

Just a few months, on March 2, an oil operator discovered signs of an oil spill at a caribou crossing on the snow-covered tundra of Alaska’s North Slope. Clean-up crews have already vacuumed up more than 50,000 gallons of crude oil and melted snow off the delicate tundra, but at least one industry expert has received reports from the site that as much as 798,000 gallons could be unaccounted for, possibly making this the largest crude oil spill in the history of the North Slope, and second in Alaska only to the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill. Spills cause long-term damage to bird populations and habitat.

Please help us turn back this latest attack on America’s wildest refuge. Tell Congress to offer real solutions to our energy needs, not band aid solutions and not Arctic Refuge destruction.


Audubon Public Policy Division
1150 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Suite 600
Washington, DC 20036
1-800-659-2622
[email protected]



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
14. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
sarahlee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
15. Save Our Environment
has an action alert up now as well.


They say:

"Say NO to Drilling in the Arctic Refuge Before It’s Too Late – The House Votes Tomorrow!

H.R. 5429, the so-called “American-Made Energy and Good Jobs Act,” uses wildly inflated numbers to claim that drilling the Arctic Refuge is good for labor and good for the federal treasury.

The truth? The big winner in this plan is ExxonMobil; who will be stuffing its already bloated coffer with billions more in profits. And the biggest losers are the American people; we’ll sacrifice our greatest wildlife sanctuary while feeding our addiction to high-priced oil."

http://ga3.org/campaign/ArcticMay06
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
16. There is an excellent chance of retaking his district this year.
I'm going to work hard to help take it back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. OpEd:"It's time for Pombo to come clean on the Mariana Islands & Abramoff
erry McNerney joined Pete McCloskey today in calling on Congressman Richard Pombo to answer questions about his knowledge of deplorable factory conditions in the Northern Mariana Islands (a territory of the United States) as well as Jack Abramoff's lobbying of Pombo to block anti-sweatshop Mariana Islands legislation in Congress.

On Monday, McCloskey raised the issue of Pombo's "willful inaction" to address the forced abortions, forced prostitution and exploitation of young women from China, the Philippines and Thailand to sew clothing that is labeled "Made in the USA" but is produced under employment practices illegal in the mainland United States.
http://www.yubanet.com/artman/publish/article_36484.shtml


Pombo is worse than a piece of crap.

Glad to hear you are working to get this guy thrown out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarahlee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
17. They are voting on this bill
Right now...

Fingers crossed that it really had no chance....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluesplayer Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
18. these assholes
would drill in the Grand Canyon or Niagara Falls if they thought they could make a dime in subsidies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarahlee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
19. Republicans won vote to bring this up for debate and vote
So just in case you need a reminder....




That is what we will get more of... in one of the last pieces of real wilderness left on this planet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarahlee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
21. If you have not called
Call right now. Please.

In the words of Tom DeLay, this isn't about opening up a little slice of the Refuge, it's about precedent. The slippery slope is very much in effect here.

Someone else said: "This thing is like herpes. It never dies." We have to continue to be the medication that keeps it from spreading this time. (And the next and the next)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarahlee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
22. They won....
HR 5429 just passed, I think the vote was Yea, 225; Nay, 20l. It will be awhile before the official roll call is posted.

...and 27 dems defected and voted YES.

House OKs Oil Drilling in Alaska Refuge
WASHINGTON -- Citing the public outcry over $3-a-gallon gasoline and America's heavy reliance on foreign oil, the House voted Thursday to open an Alaska wildlife refuge to oil drilling, knowing the prospects for Senate approval were slim.

Drilling proponents contend that the refuge on Alaska's North Slope would provide 1 million barrels a day of additional domestic oil at peak production and reduce the need for imports.

But opponents to developing what environmentalists argue is a pristine area where drilling will harm caribou, polar bears and migratory birds, said Congress should pursue conservation and alternative energy sources that would save more oil than would be tapped from the refuge.


http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=politicsNews&storyID=2006-05-25T193441Z_01_WAT005657_RTRUKOC_0_US-ENERGY-CONGRESS-ANWR.xml

Thanks to everyone who did make calls.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarahlee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
23. Dems who voted with Big Oil
here are the 27 Democrats who voted with the republican majority for rape and exploitation of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

Berry
Bishop (GA)
Boren
Boyd
Brady (PA)
Cardoza
Costa
Cramer
Cuellar
Davis (AL)
Davis (TN)
Edwards
Green, Al
Green, Gene
Hinojosa
Jefferson
Kanjorski
Melancon
Murtha
Ortiz
Peterson (MN)
Reyes
Ross
Skelton
Tanner
Taylor (MS)
Thompson (MS)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC