Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sham ethics reform passes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 09:07 PM
Original message
Sham ethics reform passes
Inspite of Cunningham and Abramoff scandals.
Inspite of Delay.
Inspite of the rampant cronyism and corporate takeover of our country we get this instead.

--------


No Restrictions on Lavish Gifts:
Current gift limits will remain unchanged.

No Ban on Free Exotic Trips:
Lawmakers will still be able to accept lavish privately-funded trips from lobbyists.

No Increase in Lobbyist Transparency:
Lobbyists can continue to pay $25,000 or $50,000 for a campaign fundraiser, with no oversight.

No Ethics Training for Members:
Ethics training will be mandatory for all congressional staff, but not for members.

No Revolving Door Slow-Down:
A companion piece of legislation to the lobbying bill would require administration officials to wait at least two years after they leave office before becoming lobbyists. But there is no legislation to create a similar two-year waiting period for lawmakers.

No Grassroots Lobbying Regulation:
There are no disclosure rules “for professional lobbying firms that are retained to spend money on campaigns aimed at stimulating the public to lobby Congress, including multimillion dollar advertising campaigns.”

No Enforcement of Existing Rules:
The bill “includes no mechanism for enforcing and monitoring old and new rules.”

Weak Earmark Reform:
The bill restricts appropriations earmarks, but does not reform earmarks in tax and authorization bills.

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/03/house-sham-ethics/

Republicans strike again.

How they voted:
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2006/roll119.xml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Fortunately they didn't pass a resolution honoring the GOP
Leadership for fostering an environment in the House which allowed such a successful ethics climate to exist that no possible improvement could be made. 435 of the best minds in the Country were unable to legislate any enhancements to the successful system we have in place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NI4NI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. 8 DEMS voted for it! WHY???
Edited on Wed May-03-06 09:39 PM by NI4NI
Barrow, Marshall(Georgia), Boren(Okla), Boswell(Iowa), Cueller(Texas), Matheson(Utah), Melancon(La.) Taylor(Mississippi)......Republican Wolf (Va) voted against it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC