Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wash. Note: Dana Priest's multiple sources on CIA prisons (in Europe?)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 02:20 PM
Original message
Wash. Note: Dana Priest's multiple sources on CIA prisons (in Europe?)
Bush Should Polygraph Staff on Plame Outing: Dana Priest's Sources were Multiple and Were Most Likely in Europe
http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/archives/001365.php

One other thing. I was surprised when the news of Mary McCarthy's firing happened that so many immediately jumped to the conclusion that she was Dana Priest's source on the secret CIA prisons.

I kept my powder dry on that one and did not post or link to any of these stories because they conflicted with something I had written about Priest's work and sources some time ago:

...

Immediately, after Priest's story, Senate Republicans began attacking each other -- thinking that one or more of them had spilled classified information to Dana Priest as the revelation of such detention centers was allegedly made by Vice President Cheney at a Republican caucus meeting in the Senate. Bill Frist and Dennis Hastert actually called for an investigation of who leaked the information to Priest rather than calling for an investigation of the secret detention facilities.


...

My hunches are that her source(s), are in Europe -- not the United States. Dana Priest made two long trips through Europe and Eastern Europe these last couple of years and developed much of her material on the secret prisons there.


There's obviously much more to this story than meets the eye. And, yeah, why not give the entire administration the polygraph?? :D


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Because this was an excuse to purge a democrat
Edited on Tue Apr-25-06 02:33 PM by ThomCat
from the CIA, apparently. Finding the real leaker is secondary, and probably being done much more secretly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Of course, and consider these points >>>>>>>
House Poised To Grant Arrest (Domestic Police) Powers To CIA, NSA
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x1020302

Goss was 'given instructions' to purge Democrats from the CIA
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x1021473

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Not purge, but scapegoat.
Edited on Tue Apr-25-06 02:39 PM by Zen Democrat
Ms. McCarthy had already retired from the CIA in February. Her last day was supposed to be April 30. They fired her a week before she was already leaving.

This smells of scapegoat. I suspect that leaker was one the Republican Senators briefed by Dick Cheney -- maybe Specter or McCain or Hagel. They "fire" a CIA person already retiring and she gets the rap for the leak. That's my scenario.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. By firing her, do they deny her retirement benefits?
That seems like a vicious form of retribution for not being a "team player."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Beats getting killed
or suicided which is the preferred method now a days.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Good question. But, doesn't Bugman keep his even if convicted?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Doubt it. The government has the most liberal health & pension benefits.
And that would include the CIA. If congressmen are "fired", they still get their big benefit package.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. she won't lose her pension
heard it somewhere-was worried about that! especially after seeing they want to use loss of pension benefits as punishment for leakers--apparently not this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Yup, I think she's been set up as an example to others at the CIA
I think Goss needed to hold up a body like some kind of bizarre voodoo sacrifice to everyone else at the agency and this woman was a convenient scapegoat.

It's very chilling.

As for her retirement $$ and perks, if she's been cut off, I suspect that there are some excellent lawyers out there sniffing blood in the water on this one, salivating at getting this wrongful termination lawsuit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. Something useful i once heard Bob Woodward say, he said that when an
article contains named and unnamed sources that the unnamed source is usually one of the named sources but wants whatever juicy tidbit that is the bombshell to not be attributed to he/she. Maybe the unnamed source's name is actually in her article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Interesting...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC