Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did the president act in "BAD FAITH?"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 12:34 PM
Original message
Did the president act in "BAD FAITH?"
After comments by Arlen Specter, which imply that censure is somehow reserved for presidents acting in "bad faith" Russ Feingold said while Specter did not help draft the resolution, he agrees the words "bad faith" best describe actions by Bush.

Is censure only reserved to presidents acting in bad faith?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
paul_fromatlanta Donating Member (545 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm pretty sure rules for Presidential censure do not exist
Somebody can correct me if I am wrong but I have never seen a constitutional or other legal basis for Presidential censure.

But congress can pass any resolution the like so there is nothing stopping them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. HA HA
they just applauded Lehey... he said "WE KNOW THE PRESIDENT BROKE THE LAW"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluethruandthru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes...they save Impeachment
for those acting in bad taste (monica)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. CALL NOW
TELL C-SPAN YOUR VIEWS ON RUSS OR CENSURE

202 585 3885

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burning Water Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. I would think so.
Their job is to make decisions, and they cannot always make the right ones. So, yes, I would have to say that they should have acted in "bad faith" before they are censured.

Do you really this will be a problem with censuring *?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. was this next example considered a "bad faith" act?
The Senate has censured a president only once -- in 1834, when an anti-administration coalition demanded that President Andrew Jackson produce a document having to do with his veto of a bill to recharter the Bank of the United States.

The body voted 26-20 to censure Jackson when he refused to provide the document to the Senate. The censure was "expunged" from the record in 1837 by a Senate again in the hands of Jacksonian Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burning Water Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. I have no idea.
Things have changed considerably since the days of Andrew Jackson.

And, as the entire episode shows, 'censure" doesn't even go on his "permanent record" (Andy's, I mean). It's a PR stunt only. And it may work. I hope so. Or it may backfire. We'll see shortly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. He said the law worked fine, then broke the law cause the law sucked
we need a better way to fight terror. Bush skirts the law...always...this weakens america and requires censure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Others in this hearing, including a real expert Dean say he broke the law
Russ is trying to stop the bleeding from the gaping wound Republicans have put in our Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thorandmjolnir Donating Member (390 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. No, you don't need bad faith for censure
Bad faith is a legal term. When it comes to public officials, it means that they loose their official immunity and can be held personally liable, when they act in bad faith and break the law or constitution.

A government official can break the law and not be held personally liable if the court finds that the official thought he was within the law, or if the law is vague or unsettled in that particular area.

The immunity is meant to shield government officials from all kinds of lawsuit, when they are acting within their official duties. Bad faith proves that the official knew he was outside of his official duties.


BAD FAITH IS NOT REQUIRED FOR CENSURE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paul_fromatlanta Donating Member (545 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Do you have the rules for presidential censure? I cant find any.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Thank you for such an articulate description of term Bjarne
Obviously you have good grasp of the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. He embodies bad faith
and they ALL know that, what is the problem? No integrity again, what can we expect from those who REFUSE to snatch this country back from the dangerous course it's on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
European Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. Bad faith isn't needed--No man is to be blindly trusted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
15. Bush has broken the law multiple times
and even admits it whenever he declares that a particular law doesn't apply to him.

That is not only bad faith, he breaks the law deliberately. That's criminal.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
16. I don't think faith had anything to do with it,
he was just acting bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
17. yeah, that'll stand up in court.....
I guess crooks and criminals could try that excuse...

bad faith is just listening to the devil
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
18. When has he ever acted in GOOD faith? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
19. Damn straight he did. Bush epitomizes bad faith.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
martymar64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
20. Better question, has he ever acted in good faith?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
21. No, president acted IN A CRIMINAL FASHION
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC