Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ned Lamont just said on Hartmann that Lieberman may run as Repug

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 01:16 PM
Original message
Ned Lamont just said on Hartmann that Lieberman may run as Repug
Thom was asking Ned if the battle between he and Lieberman may wound both of them so badly that a Republican could beat whomever survives the primary. Ned said there is no credible Repub in the race then said there is talk Lieberman may run as a Republican!

I say Joe should do just that - he's mostly a DINO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Come out of the closet, Joe, and reveal your true self.
You'll be much happier. And so will we.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tatertop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. No surprise. A traitor is what a traitor does.
What a clown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grown2Hate Donating Member (833 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. Other than on his defense views, I keep hearing he's extremely liberal.
Is there any evidence of that, some sort of compendium of his votes on certain issues, etc? I'm just curious. Because all I ever hear about is his war cheer leading, all I ever see is his right wing tendencies. I'm just curious if there is any evidence the other way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. 100% voting rating by Planned Parenthood:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. The American Humane Society gave in a 100% rating
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. The NRA gave him an 'F' for his Senate voting record
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Here are a couple
His overall voting record is pretty good. It's mainly his rhetoric and his zeal for appearing non-partisan that undermine his credibility.

http://www.ontheissues.org/Joseph_Lieberman.htm

And here's a position sheet from Project Vote-Smart: http://www.vote-smart.org/npat.php?can_id=S0141103

Also from Project Vote-Smart is his voting record: http://www.vote-smart.org/voting_category.php?can_id=S0141103

Here are his interest group ratings: http://www.vote-smart.org/issue_rating_category.php?can_id=S0141103

And here's his National Journal ranking for last year: http://nationaljournal.com/voteratings/sen/lib_cons.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bob3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. no it's his weaseling and desire to be stroked that is killing him
For example he voted against Alito in the conformation vote - however when Kerry tried to set up a filibuster (the only way really to defeat the nomination) Joe voted against that. His no vote on Alito was meaningless. He did the same with the bankruptcy bill - a toxic gift from the GOP that will keep on giving.

He also made a horses ass out himself by suggesting that rape victims at catholic hospitals could just take a cab to another hospital if they wanted emergency contraception. This is not the view of a man who cares much about women.

He's useless, really. And can be counted on to undercut ANY Democratic initiative as long as he's in the Senate. It's ego I think, he loves the regular spot on Hannity's show as Fox News' "good" democrat.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Lieberman on War and Peace vs Lieberman on domestic issues
Edited on Thu Mar-23-06 01:44 PM by Douglas Carpenter
For the sake of constext I have contrasted Sen.Lieberman's record with that of Sen. Kennedy, Sen. Clinton, Sen. Allen and Sen. McCain

Sen. Lieberman voting record on most domestic-social issues is essentially moderately liberal. However one must also keep in mind that he is a strong proponent of neoliberal economic ideology otherwise known as "free trade" and along with that a strong supporter of NAFTA and CAFTA.

The major problem many of us have with Sen. Lieberman is his staunch support for both the Iraq War and a militaristic/interventionist world view in general. Particularly annoying is his continual public support for Bush Administration war policies and public denunciation of Democrats who oppose them.

I don't think this is a minor point. Just as the Viet Nam War derailed the Democratic Party and the Great Society--the militarism and hegemonic philosophy of the GOP as well as Sen. Lieberman and Democrats who think like him may very well derail any serious advancement of a socially progressive agenda. In fairness to Sen. Lieberman let me add that although his ratings on War/Peace issues are significantly below average by Democratic Party Senatorial standards they are far and away above even "moderate Republicans" like Sen. McCain

Here is a look at interest group ratings of Sen. Lieberman both on War and Peace issues and domestic/social issues. I have contrasted them with Sen. Kennedy, Sen. Clinton, Sen. Allen and Sen. McCain.

War and Peace -- from Peace Majority -- a coalition of various peace groups - link: http://www.peacemajority.org/about.htm

Sen. Lieberman: Final Score: 13.0/52.0 votes = 25%

Sen. Kennedy: Final Score: 72.0/87.0 votes = 83%

Sen. Clinton: Final Score: 52.0/88.0 votes = 59%

Sen. Allen: Final Score: 3.0/88.0 votes = 3%

Sen. McCain: Final Score: 3.0/85.0 votes = 4%

__________________________

This is courtesy of project vote smart - link:

http://www.vote-smart.org/index.htm
_____________________

2004 Senator Lieberman supported the interests of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation 33 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator Kennedy supported the interests of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation 100 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation 67 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator Allen supported the interests of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation 0 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator McCain supported the interests of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation 0 percent in 2004.
_________________________________

2004 Senator Lieberman supported the interests of the Peace Action 38 percent in 2004

2004 Senator Kennedy supported the interests of the Peace Action 100 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the Peace Action 75 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator Allen supported the interests of the Peace Action 0 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator McCain supported the interests of the Peace Action 13 percent in 2004.
______________________________________

2004 Senator Lieberman supported the interests of the National Abortion Reproductive Rights Action League 100 percent in 2004

2004 Senator Kennedy supported the interests of the National Abortion Reproductive Rights Action League 100 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the National Abortion Reproductive Rights Action League 100 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator Allen supported the interests of the National Abortion Reproductive Rights Action League 0 percent in 2004

2004 Senator McCain supported the interests of the National Abortion Reproductive Rights Action League 0 percent in 2004.
__________________


2003-2004 Senator Lieberman supported the interests of the American Civil Liberties Union 83 percent in 2003-2004

2003-2004 Senator Kennedy supported the interests of the American Civil Liberties Union 86 percent in 2003-2004.

2003-2004 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the American Civil Liberties Union 78 percent in 2003-2004

2003-2004 Senator Allen supported the interests of the American Civil Liberties Union 0 percent in 2003-2004.

2003-2004 Senator McCain supported the interests of the American Civil Liberties Union 22 percent in 2003-2004.
_____________________________


2004 Senator Lieberman supported the interests of the Americans for Democratic Action 75 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator Kennedy supported the interests of the Americans for Democratic Action 100 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the Americans for Democratic Action 95 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator Allen supported the interests of the Americans for Democratic Action 15 percent in 2004..

2004 Senator McCain supported the interests of the Americans for Democratic Action 35 percent in 2004.
__________________________.

2004 Senator Lieberman supported the interests of the AFL-CIO 83 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator Kennedy supported the interests of the AFL-CIO 100 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the AFL-CIO 100 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator Allen supported the interests of the AFL-CIO 17 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator McCain supported the interests of the AFL-CIO 33 percent in 2004.
_________________________

2004 Senator Lieberman supported the interests of the United Auto Workers 92 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator Kennedy supported the interests of the United Auto Workers 110 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the United Auto Workers 110 percent in 2004

2004 Senator Allen supported the interests of the United Auto Workers 9 percent in 2004

2004 Senator McCain supported the interests of the United Auto Workers 9 percent in 2004.
__________________________

2003-2004 Senator Lieberman supported the interests of the National Education Association 88 percent in 2003-2004.

2003-2004 Senator Kennedy supported the interests of the National Education Association 80 percent in 2003-2004.

2003-2004 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the National Education Association 85 percent in 2003-2004.

2003-2004 Senator Allen supported the interests of the National Education Association 25 percent in 2003-2004.

2003-2004 Senator McCain supported the interests of the National Education Association 35 percent in 2003-2004.
______________________


2003-2004 Senator Lieberman supported the interests of the Human Rights Campaign 88 percent in 2003-2004.

2003-2004 Senator Kennedy supported the interests of the Human Rights Campaign 100 percent in 2003-2004.

2003-2004 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the Human Rights Campaign 88 percent in 2003-2004.

2003-2004 Senator Allen supported the interests of the Human Rights Campaign 13 percent in 2003-2004.

2003-2004 Senator McCain supported the interests of the Human Rights Campaign 25 percent in 2003-2004.
_____________________________________


2003-2004 Senator Lieberman supported the interests of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights 95 percent in 2003-2004.

2003-2004 Senator Kennedy supported the interests of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights 100 percent in 2003-2004

2003-2004 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights 100 percent in 2003-2004

2003-2004 Senator Allen supported the interests of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights 7 percent in 2003-2004.

2003-2004 Senator McCain supported the interests of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights 14 percent in 2003-2004.
_____________________________

2004 Senator Lieberman supported the interests of the Arab American Institute 50 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator Kennedy supported the interests of the Arab American Institute 80 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the Arab American Institute 25 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator Allen supported the interests of the Arab American Institute 0 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator McCain supported the interests of the Arab American Institute 0 percent in 2004.
__________________________

2003-2004 Senator Lieberman supported the interests of the League of Conservation Voters 56 percent in 2003-2004.

2003-2004 Senator Kennedy supported the interests of the League of Conservation Voters 92 percent in 2003-2004.

2003-2004 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the League of Conservation Voters 92 percent in 2003-2004.

2003-2004 Senator Allen supported the interests of the League of Conservation Voters 0 percent in 2003-2004.

2003-2004 Senator McCain supported the interests of the League of Conservation Voters 56 percent in 2003-2004

____________________________

2004 Senator Lieberman supported the interests of the Christian Coalition 0 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator Kennedy supported the interests of the Christian Coalition 0 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the Christian Coalition 0 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator Allen supported the interests of the Christian Coalition 100 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator McCain supported the interests of the Christian Coalition 83 percent in 2004.
_____________________________


2004 Senator Lieberman supported the interests of the American Conservative Union 0 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator Kennedy supported the interests of the American Conservative Union 0 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the American Conservative Union 0 percent in 2004

2004 Senator Allen supported the interests of the American Conservative Union 92 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator McCain supported the interests of the American Conservative Union 72 percent in 2004.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. His comments this week about Hospitals in CT not needing to provide
contraceptives to rape victims sure didn't sound liberal to me.

He said something like "it's just a short ride to another hospital" for the rape victim to get contraception.

And how did he vote on the bankruptcy bill? I don't remember.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. actually he voted against the GOP bankruptcy bill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. Yeah, he was thinking about the distance from St. Rafe's
to Yale-NH Hospital in New Haven! Just a few blocks away, piece of cake!

I wonder how Hadassah and their daughter liked that one! They were the ones who had to wheedle him into voting against Clarence Thomas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loyalsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
26. I think he votes liberally
but his rhetoric is so right wing that it comes as a surprise. He's very moralistic except when it comes to military matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. Elect a REAL Democrat!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. His rhetoric needs to match his record
and at this point all he ever does is get face time to cheer for Bush. Yes, his voting record overall is liberal. Do we hear Liberal Democrat from the echo chamber?

Lieberman needs to wake and smell the coffee. He is being exploited by Karl Rove and Rove is winning. Until he gets that, he's not going to know what hit him as he's kicked out the door of the Capitol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. I ABSOLUTELY agree!!


http://www.nedlamont.com



" Sen. Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut reproached fellow Democrats for criticizing President Bush during a time of war.

"It's time for Democrats who distrust President Bush to acknowledge that he will be the commander in chief for three more critical years and that in matters of war we undermine presidential credibility at our nation's peril," Lieberman said."

link:

http://edition.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/12/08/democrats.iraq/?section=cnn_latest

and this interesting comment from Sen. Lieberman while in Baghdad

"Time magazine Baghdad bureau chief Michael Ware on Morning Sedition this morning:

I and some other journalists had lunch with Senator Joe Lieberman the other day and we listened to him talking about Iraq. Either Senator Lieberman is so divorced from reality that he's completely lost the plot or he knows he's spinning a line. Because one of my colleagues turned to me in the middle of this lunch and said he's not talking about any country I've ever been to and yet he was talking about Iraq, the very country where we were sitting."

link:

http://atrios.blogspot.com/2005_11_27_atrios_archive.html#113328407009752558

Again, I myself have pointed out on numerous occasions that Sen. Lieberman has a moderately liberal voting record on many domestic issues along with his enthusiastic embrace of neoliberal economic ideology.

His comments regarding the Iraq War must reveal that he is either being disingenuous or seriously delusional. The Democratic constituency of Connecticut needs the chance to express their disapproval in the Democratic Primary; win or lose.

Sen. Lieberman's very public position on the Iraq War and those who oppose it and what appears to be an embrace of a slightly modified form of neoconservative ideology is not some insignificant wedge issue. It goes to the very core of the direction of the country. Someday America will have to decide whether it wants to continue down the path of ultra-militarism or whether it wants to maintain the social fabric of our own society and some degree of moral authority in the world. It appears that Sen. Lieberman is choosing the very wrong side of history.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grown2Hate Donating Member (833 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
14. Thank you everyone for the info! N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
16. when he loses bush could appoint him to a cabinet position, SecDef maybe
Purrfect of Jomentum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riona Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
17. he may support the needed social programs
but by supporting the war, there won't be much money to fund them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. Thank you for that VERY important point
Billions for war, nothing for health care. Billions for war, nothing for cities. Billions for..you get the picture. This little fear habit we have is turning us into the Soviet Union circa 1981. The hidden cost of war-all our TAXES are spent to make the DOD, the Pentagon and all their buds rich. America, you've been punked! BUT IRAN is going to kill us all. Uh huh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
18. 10-1 the repugs don't want him either! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
19. Lieberman was on the radio this morning, and
said pretty clearly that he wouldn't even accept cross-endorsement from the GOP. He insisted that he's a Democrat.

I doubt very much there's anything to this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
21. No, he won't
This is silly fantasy. He is still our fucking cross to bear, for now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MurrayDelph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
22. He won't switch until after he's defeated
(which would be too late to enter the Senate campaign).

Joe, this Uncle Shamos, gets way too much face time as a spoiler. If he switches parties, he's
just another Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
24. what a disgrace.
I realized when Fred Barnes butt kissed Lieberman by suggesting he become Bush's Sect'y of State Lieberman had wandered too far from home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
25. Liebermanis a loyal Democrat whatever you think of him...
I'm not happy with him either...but it is ludicrous to suggest he would switch parties. It was a stupid thing for Lamont to say IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bob3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. He is not loyal to anybody but Lieberman.
He stabbed Gore in the back during the recount - he postured about Clinton. He's bailed on the fight over Alito (the no vote was for show folks) and he's been saying the Democrats have to play nice with bush - undercutting any attempt to hold W accountable for his actions. And there all those times he's played kissy face with Hannity.

He's a tool and needs to go. God save us from loyal democrats like this. I get the sense Lieberman would sell his mother for a cabinet post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
27. Holy Joe gives DINOs a bad name!
When is the primary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC