Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Straight Talk on South Dakota? (Does McCain...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 04:23 PM
Original message
Straight Talk on South Dakota? (Does McCain...
Edited on Mon Mar-06-06 04:23 PM by ProSense
see two faces when he looks in the mirror?)


Straight Talk on South Dakota?


by mcjoan
Mon Mar 06, 2006 at 11:21:13 AM PDT

John McCain, that self-styled "maverick" of Republican politics, continues to try to have it both ways, this time on the politics of abortion and specifically, the South Dakota ban.


A spokesperson said Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., would have signed the South Dakota legislation, "but would also take the appropriate steps under state law -- in whatever state -- to ensure that the exceptions of rape, incest or life of the mother were included."


Well, Senator, the problem is that the South Dakota bill specifically ruled out exceptions for rape or incest, allowing only an exception for the health life of the mother, and by golly, the women of South Dakota were damned lucky to get that. I guess it's small comfort to know that their own lives rate just a little bit higher than a fertilized egg.

McCain has tried in the past to distance himself from the Party of Dobson, but the allure of those hard-core, dedicated votes just keeps bringing him back. And McCain isn't the only one.


Virginia Sen. George Allen's (R) chief of staff, Dick Wadhams, a national GOP strategist, said Allen "has consistently supported the rights of the people in their states to pass laws which reflect their views and values." A spokeswoman for Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney (R) said that if Romney were the governor of South Dakota, "he would sign it. believes that states should have the right to be pro-life if that is the will of the people."


Just to be clear, here is what McCain, Romney, and Allen are associating themselves with.

more...

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/3/6/132113/2039
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. And yet...
<<<Virginia Sen. George Allen's (R) chief of staff, Dick Wadhams, a national GOP strategist, said Allen "has consistently supported the rights of the people in their states to pass laws which reflect their views and values." A spokeswoman for Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney (R) said that if Romney were the governor of South Dakota, "he would sign it. believes that states should have the right to be pro-life if that is the will of the people.">>>

And what about the OTHER people? The possibly bare minority of folks who DON'T support such a decision?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Charlie Brown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. McCain trying to have it both ways
and revealing his own hypocrisy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
biscotti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. McCain has lost
all credibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. McCain never had any credibility. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PlanetBev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. No, the people haven't spoken
South Dakota legislature refused the right of it's people to have a referendum on the subject. They knew if it came up for a vote it would be soundly defeated.

The minority has dictated to the majority. That is not democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. IF that is the case
then all those legislators and the Governor need to be voted out of office ASAP. If the legislature took the right to decide this via initiative or referendum then the people need to get rid of them.

Tyranny of the minority is not democracy.

Mz Pip
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC