Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bill O'Lielly: U.S. should leave Iraq "as fast as humanly possible"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 12:56 PM
Original message
Bill O'Lielly: U.S. should leave Iraq "as fast as humanly possible"
Edited on Thu Feb-23-06 12:57 PM by vpilot
because "there are so many nuts in the country" :web: http://mediamatters.org/items/200602220007
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
obnoxiousdrunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Who cares what
Loofah has to say ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Only his wing-nut followers,
Edited on Thu Feb-23-06 01:02 PM by vpilot
but it's interesting that with all the disgusting rhetoric he has spewed over this, now he thinks it's a good idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. "there are so many nuts in the country"
If that's not the pot calling the kettle...

If that's the case, he would fit right in. Baghdad Bill. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats_win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Arab oil boycott in 1973 showed America that the ME is nuts. 30 years on,
the Republicans are figuring it out and calling for us to end our dependence on their bloody oil. Only thing is, we were on the right track before arrogant Raygun ended our goal of getting out of the ME.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Montauk6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Oh... sniff... you're giving me serious 70s nostalgia pangs...
Gasohol, solar energy, compact cars, Woodsy Owl, Iron Eyes Cody...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. A little bit from history:
David Stockman's book "The Triumph of Politics" where they cut research funding into "alternative" fuel options.

Paperback edition, first Avon printing, 1987, page 125.

"Among the wasteful corruptions of the Second Republic, the Carter Energy Department stood out in my mind as a great, malodorous garbage dump. The Carter budget had allocated $17 billion for the Energy Department over the years 1982-86. What for? So that it could subsidize such economic white elephants as a multi-billion-dollar coal-liquefication plant for the Gulf Oil Company, windmills, fluidized bed combusters, solar-power towers, gasohol plants, shale plants, Stirling engines, photovoltaic cells, and countless other experiments in high-cost, unproven energy technologies.

There was nothing wrong with all this experimentation. It's precisely the kind of thing Adam Smith had invented the free market to accomplish. But the federal bureaucracy was neither competent nor called upon to usurp the job."

...

"The synfuels (synthetic fuels) plants he (Jim Edwards) was fighting to save would 'put cap on world oil prices,' he (Edwards) said. Never mind that it was not in the power of the U.S. Department of Energy to alter something called the law of supply and demand."


---------------------------

Stockman later goes into detail that, left to the Carter budget, the deficit was going to go down . . . of course, all the promises alzheimer Ron made destroyed any hope of even coming close to keeping the deficit in check . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. Think about why he wants out.
If they leave now they can still claim victory. If things really start going south then pull out it will look like we're just giving up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caretha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. O'Reilly - Then & Now
NOW February 23, 2006

From the above Media Matters article:

Summary: Bill O'Reilly suggested that the United States "hand over everything to the Iraqis as fast as humanly possible" because "here are so many nuts in the country -- so many crazies -- that we can't control them." O'Reilly has previously called those advocating immediate withdrawal from Iraq "pinheads" and compared them to Hitler appeasers.

Can't you just imagine the right wing wackos shaking their mutual brain in agreement with this idiot as he referred to those against the war as "pinheads" and compared them to "Hitler appeasers"!

Then Sept 23, 2005

From Fox on the O'Reilly Factor

DONAHUE: Let me tell you what's radical. What's radical is to send more Americans to die in this war, which is a monumental blunder...

O'REILLY: All right.

DONAHUE: ... by a president who swaggered us into it with, by the way, the at least tacit approval of the Democratic Party. There's a lot of sin to go around here.

O'REILLY: What's radical...

DONAHUE: You want to send more people to this war? Is that your position?

O'REILLY: If we cut and run out of there like you want to do, we would be putting every American in a thousand times more jeopardy than they're in now.

DONAHUE: We're going to cut and run anyway, Bill.

O'REILLY: Well, that's your opinion.

DONAHUE: It's not my opinion. American military leaders have said we're going to draw down, beginning next year. The reason they said that...

O'REILLY: There's a difference between drawing down and cutting and running.

DONAHUE: Well...

O'REILLY: You're a cut and run guy, and I don't want my family in danger because of you..

DONAHUE: You want to stay the course, don't you? You don't...

O'REILLY: Look, here's what I want to do. I want to give the Iraqis a chance to train their army so they can defeat these people who are trying to turn it into a terrorist state.

DONAHUE: Bill...

O'REILLY: That's what I want to do.

You can go to Crooks & Liars to see the complete vid of O'Reilly & Donahue.

O'Reilly and those like him truly have no soul. The O'Reilly's, Coulter's, Hannity's & Limbaugh's and those like them deserve a last request - as in what color they want their blindfold and brand of cigarette. I hold them as responsible as the Shrub administration for every death in the Iraq war. Though they will probably never be held responsible in a court of law, I hope and pray that one day they will be shunned by society to the point where they go into hiding and change their last names
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jseankil Donating Member (604 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. ^ This post needs to be nominated.
Where's the no spin zone bill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harald Ragnarsson Donating Member (366 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. These a**holes screamed their way into Iraq
and now can't cut and run fast enough. Guess these rightwingers are a bunch of chickens**ts afterall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC