Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lieberman v. Lamont in Democratic primary. Choose one!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 11:15 PM
Original message
Lieberman v. Lamont in Democratic primary. Choose one!
You've probably heard the buzz about Ned Lamont challenging Joe Lieberman in the Democratic primary this year.

Ned is considering running because, like most Connecticut Democrats, he is tired of being represented by a senator who is not willing to stand up to the President on the war — and on the rest of his extreme right wing agenda which is so harmful to our country.

Ned Lamont is a successful businessman who understands the importance of health care and education to our economy. He will fight for universal health care and to bring all of America's schools into the 21st Century. He believes the federal government should stay out of people's private lives and stop spying on its own citizens. He would push for energy conservation and bio fuels as better alternatives than the liquefied natural gas plant in Long Island Sound. And he would demand that corrupt public officials be held accountable for their actions.

The polls show that Democrats are ready for a change, but the entrenched interests behind Joe Lieberman are going to fight tooth and nail and pour millions of dollars into this race. To win, we'll need volunteers working hard in every city and town — and we'll need thousands more Americans pledging to contribute financially as well.

What's the next step? Ned has stated that he will not move beyond the exploratory phase of a campaign until at least 1,000 people in Connecticut have signed up to volunteer. So no matter where you live, this is a chance to make history. Please sign up today!

http://www.nedlamont.com/

It's Not Shaping Up To Be A Party For Lieberman

January 22, 2006

Greenwich millionaire Ned Lamont is strongly considering a challenge against Lieberman for the Democratic nomination to the Senate. Lamont, whose active interest in politics has been limited to developing a dead-on JFK imitation, a run for the state Senate in 1990, service on the state's pension advisory board, raising money for Bill Clinton and working with the liberal think tank the Brookings Institution on budget issues, may have found his unlikely moment.

At 52, Lamont is tan, fit and possessed of an easy confidence that often comes with being born into a fortune and making it bigger. He understands the long odds against succeeding in a primary against an incumbent senator. His interest in making the race springs from issues, not burning personal ambition. Lamont declared in a recent interview in his cable company office that "two things really got my goat." The first was the war in Iraq, which Lamont has opposed from the start. The other was last year's transportation bill with its emblematic millions for the "Bridge to Nowhere" in Alaska.

Iraq, however, is the issue that will drive Lamont's race. He was inspired when hawkish Democratic U.S. Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., called for a withdrawal of American troops late last year.

That provided a stark contrast to Lieberman's stalwart support of the war, particularly his optimistic assessment of it in a Wall Street Journal piece in November. Lieberman's chummy relationship with President Bush has added to the "groundswell of anger" that Lamont detects.

So let there be a debate, says the earnest challenger, who will have no trouble mounting and funding a primary campaign. His sunny countenance is more that of the energetic go-getter than ambitious politician. He won't let the race degenerate into a series of bitter accusations.

http://www.courant.com/hc-renniecol0122.artjan22,0,1685433.story?track=mostemailedlink
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Leiberman v. Ham Sandwich...choose one!
I choose Ham Sandwich
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toddaa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Me too
And I'm a vegetarian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spuddonna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 03:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. Ham! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ummm....LAMONT!!!!
LIEberman's performance today was deplorable. Top that with his staunch pro-Iraq views tells me that it's time for him to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. Just keep repeating, Lieberman is a jinx.
Because he is. He's a jinx on the Democratic party and he's got to go. He symbolizes everything that's wrong with this party. Jeez, he even let bush kiss him. What a disgusting display of capitulation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. A year ago Bush kissed Lieberman on the cheeks
I think we had enough of this lapdog!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yeah, but only because Lieberman kissed Bush on the ass so many times...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. Lieberman vs. Border collie mix....choose one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
8. Did Lowell Wicker decide not
to run as an Independent? Ned Lamont sounds interesting and has a sense of humor. I'm sure he can explain why he gave money to lieberman's campaign..he was under the misconception that lieberman was a Democrat and he turned out to be not so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 03:45 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Wiecker is sort of a backup
He'll run as an Independent if Lamont doesn't make it in the primary. Especially they've teamed on the goal of gettting Joe-mentum out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I love it when I hear about people
who really care for our country putting themselves out there for the good of said country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 03:28 AM
Response to Original message
9. I leave this in the hands of Connecticut Democrats, but if I were a
registered voter in Connecticut, I'd go with Lamont in the primary. If Lieberman prevailed there I'd go with Weicker in the general.

I'd vote for the left side of a horse's ass over Joe Lieberman any day of the week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 03:56 AM
Response to Original message
12. Lieberman lost my support (OK, well he never really had it)
for any future office when he started asking "why didn't the terrorist apologize for 9/11" when asked about Abu Ghraib. Before that, I would defend him on domestic issues. I found the statement so asenine and inexcusable that he could brush aside torture. At several points he seemed to be undercutting Kerry's campaign.

Sure enough since then he's pretty much outdone himself. His continued support for the war, and today's vote shows that he can't be trusted.

I for one would vote Nay on Lieberman. A primary challenger would definetely get my vote and $ if I had that. As for the election, if Lieberman won the primary, I'd probably go with Weicker (if he would caucus with Dems). If he didn't caucus with Dems, I would simply not vote for that office.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
14. As long as a Democrat wins the seat
That's the important point from my perspective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC