Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How many Americans are talking to Al Quaeda anyway?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
beingthere Donating Member (215 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 12:54 PM
Original message
How many Americans are talking to Al Quaeda anyway?
Well if it were true as Bush says, domestic spying is very narrow and very focussed, and only on people talking to suspected terrorists, couldn't they diffuse the criticism by telling us how many people they've spied on. E.g., they could say "we've got our ear on thirty people who we know talk regularly to Al Quaeda - we are sure they are talking to terrorists and we just need to listen so we can arrest etc etc". Carry this analysis out a bit. Suppose they said "the first time we had to listen to these people, there wasn't time to go for the warrant, or we couldn't have pinpointed it, but there is not doubt FISA Court would approve, so we will now seek warrants to lay this to rest". In summary, it clearly it is NOT narrow, it is NOT focussed because if it were, they could get totally off the hook easily. (Not that they were right, but they would still be off the hook.) So, has anyone asked them to just disclose HOW MANY conversations, by HOW MANY people they've spied on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. We'll have to wait for a whistleblower to tell us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. The coming collapse of America. It's not really about a tinpot manic org.
It's about anyone who doesn't have a 9 digit "salary".

I can't think of any other litmus test they'd apply.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why arent they being arrested if they know who they are?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. According to the few reports that millions of calls & electronic messages
were intercepted so I guess ..... DU, Quaker Peace Groups, The Kerry Campaign in Ohio,
Unions, Democratic Senators, the U.N., reporters, and academics were all in contact w/
al Qaeda like organizations.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jab105 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. If it were narrow and focused...then why the F*** didn't they get the
FISA court to approve the search warrants...
That is what is totally missing from the discussion with the press...there was a court set up just for this...and WHY?!?!?! The reason is because Nixon didn't have checks and balances...and look what happened and we wanted to make sure that it didn't happen again...

whoops!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesertRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. Do they have phones in their caves?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TalkingDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. Why, I was on the phone with Al-Quaeda just yesterday.
I told them that terrorism is wrong and that Bush should not be allowed to terrorize people. We all agreed that President George W. Bush is evil and embodies much suckage.

But seriously. We all know that this is not about Al-Quaeda or terrorism. This is the Uber-Nixonian enemies list.

Hi Agent Mike! Porn Boobies Teen Lust Rumsfeld.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murray hill farm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. That was sooooooooo funny, you
talking dog, you! Hahahahahahahaha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shortyfuse Donating Member (114 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. only those on Google
Or AOL or MSN or.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Small narrow group
Edited on Sun Jan-29-06 01:51 PM by PBass
Only those Americans using a telephone or a computer.

I am certain that Team Bush is spying on political rivals with this program. That is the only plausible reason they wouldn't want a paper trail at FISA. FISA keeps all this warrant information top-secret to begin with, so there was never a chance that getting the required warrant would reveal something to the enemy (unless Bush wants to claim that FISA has been infiltrated with "terr-ists" and spies).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. AQ
stopped using electronic communication in 1998.
So the answer is "none".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
High Plains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
12. Not me. I put them on that "no call" list
I hate it when they call during supper time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC