Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chris Matthews: "You mean, like mice like cheese"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 03:17 PM
Original message
Chris Matthews: "You mean, like mice like cheese"
'Hardball with Chris Matthews' for December 14

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10479638/

MATTHEWS: Let's take a look at our own poll, NBC “Wall Street Journal” poll out just today. Forty-two percent say Bush is been giving some good reasons for keeping those troops in Iraq. So people believe that he's trying and succeeding in articulating, at least, his reasons. In other words, they're beginning to say, agree or not, he knows what he's talking about.



(Charlie) COOK (National Journal): But you are seeing the president's numbers across the board come up a little bit. And I think it's three things. One, is you had a lot—you've had good economic news all year long, but I think they finally—the good economic news finally get a critical mass.

MATTHEWS: Where is it showing itself, the good news?

COOK: Excuse me?

MATTHEWS: Where is the good economic feeling showing itself?

COOK: Across the board just sort of Republican and general approval numbers unrelated to Iraq have gone up.

MATTHEWS: How do you put that against the news from out of the General Motors with 30,000 guys and women, you know, laid off?

COOK: OK. Here you go right direction, wrong track. Do you think the country is headed in the right direction or off on the wrong track? Right direction numbers have moved up a little bit.

The other thing is Harriet Myers really cost him. Whenever the president's approval ratings among Republicans only is above 80 than his overall approval is over 40. But when it drops below 80 percent, he starts getting down into the 30's.

After Harriet you had enough Republicans, enough conservatives left him that allowed him to drop it back into the 30's, and then when that was over kind of push back up.

MATTHEWS: I agree with you. And you know what I think watching these events and being on television tonight. I do sense that something clicked back. There was a bad period there, which was Katrina when he seemed to be out to lunch not really aware of what was going on. He had to have somebody put together a DVD together to tell him what was going on.

And then that odd weekend when he went off and picked Harriet Miers because her deputy said so. And then something clicked. What clicked in? And he started to give these very impressive speeches the last couple of weeks.

COOK: I have to throw Libby in there too.

I think sometimes you have to hit rock bottom to start turning around. And I think that was it. And then one last thing is Democrats. When the focus was on, look, we never should have gone into Iraq, and we have screwed it up.

MATTHEWS: They won that argument.

COOK: Right.

But when the venue changed over to what do we do now? That's when Democrats lost—started—went on a much more less...

MATTHEWS: Has Howard Dean helped him by calling, you know, we can't win, that statement?

COOK: Yes, I think that was a problem. What was that on a San Antonio radio station? But it got a lot of play elsewhere.

MATTHEWS: A lot of bounce.

COOK: Yes, absolutely.

And the Democrats are just all over the map. When they were focused on one, pretty much one message, they were doing well. When they went all over the map, down.

MATTHEWS: Why didn't the Democrats focus on the bad Intel and stay there? That this war was misdirected from the beginning. We shouldn't have gone in and keep saying we shouldn't have gone in?

COOK: Because Democrats are undisciplined. I mean, you know, our grandparents could have told us this.

MATTHEWS: You mean, like mice like cheese.

COOK: Yes, yes.

MATTHEWS: OK. Thank you, Charlie Cook. You're the best.

COOK: Take care. See you.

MATTHEWS: Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. What in the world is he talking about???
:freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. WillRogers" I don't belong to an organized Party, I 'm a Democrat"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. How true that is
Edited on Thu Dec-15-05 03:47 PM by FreedomAngel82
Anyone who says the left is organized is really shitting themselves. I always laugh when someone says "the organized left." *snort*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. He's looking at the world through.......
his GOP goggles. They distort things in a way which makes everything seem just peachy-keen! The disconnect between the neo-cons and real people gets worse every day. They really don't have a clue, do they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. nice haircut, charlie. yer mom do that with a bowl on yer head?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mark11727 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. "STEP AWAY FROM THE FLOWBIE, AND PUT YOUR HANDS ON YOUR HEAD"
(voice on megaphone)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vixengrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Shoot that ain't no Flow-Bee cut.
My dad uses a Flowbee on the dog's ass so he can have a trouble-free poo. That looks worse'n a dog's rear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mark11727 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. HA!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. "our grandparents could have told us this"
The ones that benefitted from all those New Deal programs, and Roosevelt's decisive leadership during a REAL war? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. And BTW, The numbers are back DOWN stupid. (Cook )
According to Gallup AND Zogby, who don't usually agree! Matthews is a schill no question. And he uses dated info!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. Mice...cheese...I'm clueless
Why do I have a knot in my stomach?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Eternal verities
1) Mice like cheese.
2) Democrats are undisciplined as a party and will not stick to a party-line message.
3) Republicans are incipiently Fascist and care mainly about how much loot their constituents can carry off in any given legislative season, with their party's totalitarian tendencies checked only by their corrupt self-indulgence.

Things that were known to be true generations ago, and are still true today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. I believe he is implying that the Democrats fell for a trap.
The Republican Neocons believe that the end results always justify the means. The Democratic Party is more concerned with truth, justice, fair play, equality, tolerance, human rights etc.

When Dean came out and said we cannot win their militarily and we should not have went there because the policy was based on lies to the American People, this is was truth, however to the neocons and their MSM whore enablers like Matthews, this is ammunition to be used against us on a nationalistic basis. Truth means nothing to them, only money and power, they would have been proud Nazis in the 30s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadisonProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
9. Tweety is an idiot!
"And he started to give these very impressive speeches the last couple of weeks."

Jesus, now I heard everything. What an ass.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. He spent a large portion of yesterday's show...
...SWOONING over Bush's "return."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMarple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. This "sunny nobility" is clueless idiocy.
Edited on Thu Dec-15-05 04:02 PM by MissMarple
Edited...I misspelled Gawd. ;)

I heard him say that. I could hardly believe it. Tweetie has been watching the Gawd channels again.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
minvis Donating Member (334 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
11. I think what he meant is
mice like cheese is a given fact and Democrats are undisciplined is a fact.

I don't agree, but I think that's what he was trying to say in his f***ed up English.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
13. As much as I hate the media....
There is something that I do believe makes some sense.........

MATTHEWS:" Why didn't the Democrats focus on the bad Intel and stay there? That this war was misdirected from the beginning. We shouldn't have gone in and keep saying we shouldn't have gone in? "

I say maybe cause the "better than sliced bread candidate for 2008" and the best Anti-Hillary Dem to run according to many Democrats, pundits and DUers is Mark Warner, who said.....""This Democrat doesn't think we need to re-fight how we got into (the Iraq war)." :eyes: http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N28277588.htm

The other Democrats who voted for this....guess don't want to keep bringing it up either (Biden, Clinton, Bayh, Edwards, Kerry).

My pronouncement? That leaves up shit creek without a paddle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMarple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. How can we stay the course if the course was wrong in the first place?
Is that what you mean? Maybe we need a two pronged message. We shouldn't have gone to war in the first place and the guys who took us there have no idea how or desire to get us out.

They wanted this war for the oil and U.S. hegemony and neither is working out so well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Well...I was only stating that Tweety does make sense in his statement
That Democrats need not stray from the "how we went to war" issue and that most Democrats do agree that it was Bush that got us there (except for Lieberman of course). That's a winner for Democrats.....when folks are faced with choices.

I do believe that it would be most effective to continue that mantra nice and loud....even while offering up various plans, while all the while calling for an investigation.

Some Democrats don't seem to want to discuss how we got there....as though we can only make one statement at a time, and that "how we got there" is not key at this point.

I think it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMarple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. I think Tweety has a point, as well.
It's hard to go back an revisit it, and they can't ignore it either. We do need to incorporate the Republican spin that took us to war, the incompetent way we are waging the war, and why this administration wanted to go into Iraq even before 9/11. That last part doesn't get a lot of play. The Dems are too polite, and don't want to be labeled by the Republican spin machine. They tiptoe around the sleeping elephant in the living room.

The whole thing hangs together. Hubris, incompetence, and corporate greed have gotten us where we are, and the Republicans have convinced the public that they are supposed to reward that, in other words stay the course and don't complain. Someone needs to ask why we are using our military like it's a private, corporate militia.

The Dems need to step up and quit being weenie batters and hit a few out of the ball park. To do that they need to practice some teamwork to provide the follow through. They are going to need some strategic back up. And a poster below has mentioned the obstruction coming from the media. There has to be a way around that. There has to be. It would involve money, of course, and developing the cohesive message we are talking about.

I think that Republican greed will catch up to the Bushies and neocons, but the Dems have to get their stuff together, start acting like winners, and play a little...hardball. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. "Why didn't the Democrats focus on the bad Intel?"
Because, Mr. Matthews, as you well know, the Washington punditry and the talk show hosts and everyone else who is an opinion maker in this country dismissed the bad intelligence as "old news" or that "the Democrats believed these lies, too." In addition, the GOP comes out with a new scandal practically every day, which you go haring off after for about 12 seconds before the next shiny object distracts you.

Some Democrats do indeed mention the bad intelligence, and the fakery and the fraud that duped our country into war. Do you have them on your program? No, because they were against invading Iraq even before it was okay in the media to be against the war, and those voices aren't allowed on the major news outlets. I don't know why that is (*cough*money*cough), but it's an inescapable fact that virtually all of the talk shows, whether network or cable, have shut out progressive voices against the war and stifled dissent on the airwaves.

So don't act the innocent about why the Democrats don't do this or that. The truth is, you don't cover the truth. Even this post would go right over your pointy little head, Mr. Matthews.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. You are correct......on what you stated.....
But the Bidens and the Mark Warners of our politics really are basically stating that we don't need to "rehash" that and for Matthews and them, somehow these are the Democrats that "count". Although, of course, they are actually more the Democrats that appease.

But yes, your point well taken; Matthews lies and propagandizes all the time....and it is truly sickening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colbushwhacker_2000 Donating Member (161 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
18. Tweety and Cook
can go straight to hell.........neither one of them are willing to tell the truth to anyone at anytime...........fuck em, both of em.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
25. "Really impressive speeches"???
"Like mice like cheese"??!!

Don't worry..bush will go back in gutter again..he's bush afterall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC