Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Bush Administration Is Revolutionizing the World of Law:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 02:00 PM
Original message
The Bush Administration Is Revolutionizing the World of Law:

http://rudepundit.blogspot.com/

Rice To Europe: The Bush Administration Is Revolutionizing the World of Law:


In her remarks over the last couple of days about the United States's "alleged" practice of extraordinary renditions of terror suspects to friendly nations of torturers and the "alleged" secret prison facilities run by the CIA, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has said nothing of factual import. She has engaged in the typical non-denial denials that are actually affirmations, the usual kinds of contortions that make lesbian gang bang porn stars look positively relaxed while getting double-dildoed; she actually said, "I wouldn't comment because whether or not we engage in certain activities is a matter of classification because they're intelligence activities, so it wouldn't matter what the answer is; I wouldn't comment."

However, ideologically, what Rice said was the rhetorical equivalent of lifting her skirt and declaring, "Fuck you, you pissants, we're motherfuckin' revolutionaries here. Now lick my cunt hard, and I better feel it all the way to the ermine-lined toes of my Ferragamo Baraks."

For surely, what Rice declared is a stunning refutation of centuries of Western legal precedent: "The captured terrorists of the 21st century do not fit easily into traditional systems of criminal or military justice, which were designed for different needs. We have to adapt." Throughout her speech yesterday, Rice kept insisting that the United States follows its own and the laws of other countries. Yet, at the same time, she could say, "his war on terrorism challenges traditional norms and precedents of previous conflicts." Get it? The United States "complies with its Constitution, its laws, and its treaty obligations" but at the same time we're trying to create new systems of laws and treaties we can bully everyone to agreeing on so that we can still say that we "comply" with laws and treaties. The Magna Carta is so quaint. Yeah, it can stand up to everything but Islamic terrorists. Good thing they haven't defeated Western civilization, you know.

Then Rice, who is small but savage, like a rabid mongoose, implicitly threatened the "democracies" of Europe if they dared to keep fucking with her on these points: "Some governments choose to cooperate with the United States in intelligence, law enforcement, or military matters. That cooperation is a two-way street. We share intelligence that has helped protect European countries from attack, helping save European lives. It is up to those governments and their citizens to decide if they wish to work with us to prevent terrorist attacks against their own country or other countries, and decide how much sensitive information they can make public. They have a sovereign right to make that choice." Or, to put it simply, "Hey, Froggy, Krauthead, and Wop, you really wanna fuck with us?"
-snip- (read on)
------------------------------------

this morning on Wash. Journal an old guy working for the bushgang said the gang wanted to hire all the lawyers they could out of law school.

I thought that an odd thing to say.

now reading Rude the dots are connecting.

interesting how the bushgang gets a woman (willing at that) to lay down their shit to the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-05 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. well buck up - you were reading the Rude Pundit

nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 02:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC